Korean J Crit Care Med.  2017 May;32(2):174-181. 10.4266/kjccm.2016.00738.

Evaluation of Respiratory Dynamics in an Asymmetric Lung Compliance Model

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. yhlee0314@gmail.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Unilateral lung hyperinflation develops in lungs with asymmetric compliance, which can lead to vital instability. The aim of this study was to investigate the respiratory dynamics and the effect of airway diameter on the distribution of tidal volume during mechanical ventilation in a lung model with asymmetric compliance.
METHODS
Three groups of lung models were designed to simulate lungs with a symmetric and asymmetric compliance. The lung model was composed of two test lungs, lung1 and lung2. The static compliance of lung1 in C15, C60, and C120 groups was manipulated to be 15, 60, and 120 ml/cmHâ‚‚O, respectively. Meanwhile, the static compliance of lung2 was fixed at 60 ml/cmHâ‚‚O. Respiratory variables were measured above (proximal measurement) and below (distal measurement) the model trachea. The lung model was mechanically ventilated, and the airway internal diameter (ID) was changed from 3 to 8 mm in 1-mm increments.
RESULTS
The mean ± standard deviation ratio of volumes distributed to each lung (VL1/VL2) in airway ID 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were in order, 0.10 ± 0.05, 0.11 ± 0.03, 0.12 ± 0.02, 0.12 ± 0.02, 0.12 ± 0.02, and 0.12 ± 0.02 in the C15 group; 1.05 ± 0.16, 1.01 ± 0.09, 1.00 ± 0.07, 0.97 ± 0.09, 0.96 ± 0.06, and 0.97 ± 0.08 in the C60 group; and 1.46 ± 0.18, 3.06 ± 0.41, 3.72 ± 0.37, 3.78 ± 0.47, 3.77 ± 0.45, and 3.78 ± 0.60 in the C120 group. The positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of lung1 was significantly increased at airway ID 3 mm (1.65 cmHâ‚‚O) in the C15 group; at ID 3, 4, and 5 mm (2.21, 1.06, and 0.95 cmHâ‚‚O) in the C60 group; and ID 3, 4, and 5 mm (2.92, 1.84, and 1.41 cmHâ‚‚O) in the C120 group, compared to ID 8 mm (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
In the C15 and C120 groups, the tidal volume was unevenly distributed to both lungs in a positive relationship with lung compliance. In the C120 group, the uneven distribution of tidal volume was improved when the airway ID was equal to or less than 4 mm, but a significant increase of PEEP was observed.

Keyword

airway obstruction; lung compliance; positive-pressure respiration, intrinsic; ventilation

MeSH Terms

Airway Obstruction
Compliance
Lung Compliance*
Lung*
Positive-Pressure Respiration
Positive-Pressure Respiration, Intrinsic
Respiration, Artificial
Tidal Volume
Trachea
Ventilation

Figure

  • Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the two-lung model. (A) Proximal measurement setting. (B) Distal measurement setting. a: spirometer; b: filter; c: endotracheal tube with an internal diameter of 8 mm; d: connector with a variable internal diameter ranging from 3 mm to 8 mm; e: breathing circuit.

  • Figure 2. Change of plateau pressure time in (A) C15, (B) C60, and (C) C120 groups. P1: start point of plateau pressure; P2: end point of plateau pressure; C15: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 15 ml/cmH2O; C60: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 60 ml/cmH2O; C120: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 120 ml/cmH2O. * P < 0.05 vs. proximal measurement.

  • Figure 3. Change of plateau pressure time at (A) proximal and (B) distal measurements during change of internal diameter. P1: start point of plateau pressure; P2: end point of plateau pressure; C15: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 15 ml/cmH2O; C60: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 60 ml/cmH2O; C120: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 120 ml/cmH2O. * P < 0.05 vs. airway internal diameter of 8 mm.

  • Figure 4. Distal measurements showing response of positive endexpiratory pressure according to internal diameter change. C15: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 15 ml/cmH2O; C60: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 60 ml/cmH2O; C120: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 120 ml/cmH2O. * P < 0.05 vs. airway internal diameter of 8 mm. Cross section area: internal diameter of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 mm were measured to be 7.1, 12.6, 19.6, 28.3, 38.5, 50.3 mm2 respectively. † P < 0.05 vs. C60 group.

  • Figure 5. Flow-time curve of distal measurement in (A) C15, (B) C60, and (C) C120 groups. The area under the curve represents volume distributed to lung1. ID: internal diameter; C15: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 15 ml/cmH2O; C60: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 60 ml/cmH2O; C120: static compliance of lung1 was manipulated as 120 ml/cmH2O.


Cited by  1 articles

Is It Essential to Consider Respiratory Dynamics?
Youngjoon Kang
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(2):223-224.    doi: 10.4266/kjccm.2017.00276.


Reference

References

1. Fitting JW. Respiratory muscles in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001; 131:483–6.
2. Ahmed SM, Athar M. Mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchial asthma. Indian J Anaesth. 2015; 59:589–98.
Article
3. Caramez MP, Borges JB, Tucci MR, Okamoto VN, Carvalho CR, Kacmarek RM, et al. Paradoxical responses to positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with airway obstruction during controlled ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33:1519–28.
Article
4. Lumb AB. Nunn’s applied respiratory physiology. 7th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone;2010. 121–3.
5. Venuta F, Boehler A, Rendina EA, De Giacomo T, Speich R, Schmid R, et al. Complications in the native lung after single lung transplantation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999; 16:54–8.
Article
6. Kollef MH, Turner JF. Intrinsic PEEP and unilateral llung hyperinflation: pathophysiology and clinical significance. Chest. 1992; 102:1220–4.
7. Eveloff SE, Rounds S, Braman SS. Unilateral lung hyperinflation and herniation as a manifestation of intrinsic PEEP. Chest. 1990; 98:228–9.
Article
8. Park SH, Yun SH, Park JC. Effects of upper airway obstruction on respiratory mechanics in a variable compliance model. Anesth Pain Med. 2011; 6:244–8.
9. Al-Rawas N, Banner MJ, Euliano NR, Tams CG, Brown J, Martin AD, et al. Expiratory time constant for determinations of plateau pressure, respiratory system compliance, and total resistance. Crit Care. 2013; 17:R23.
Article
10. Melo e Silva CA, Ventura CE. A simple model illustrating the respiratory system’s time constant concept. Adv Physiol Educ. 2006; 30:129–30.
Article
11. Hess DR. Respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. Respir Care. 2014; 59:1773–94.
Article
12. Schumaker GL, Epstein SK. Managing acute respiratory failure during exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Care. 2004; 49:766–82.
13. O’Donnell DE, Revill SM, Webb KA. Dynamic hyperinflation and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164:770–7.
Article
14. Puente-Maestu L, García de Pedro J, Martínez-Abad Y, Ruíz de Oña JM, Llorente D, Cubillo JM. Dyspnea, ventilatory pattern, and changes in dynamic hyperinflation related to the intensity of constant work rate exercise in COPD. Chest. 2005; 128:651–6.
Article
15. Anglès R, Tenorio L, Roman A, Soler J, Rochera M, de Latorre FJ. Lung transplantation for emphysema. Lung hyperinflation: incidence and outcome. Transpl Int. 2005; 17:810–4.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJCCM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr