J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2014;11:30. 10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.30.

Learning style preferences of nursing students at two universities in Iran and Malaysia

• Abdollahimohammad A
• Ja'afar R

• KMID: 2380949
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.30

Abstract

PURPOSE
Learning style preferences vary within the nursing field and there is no consensus on a predominant learning style preference in nursing students. The current study compared the learning style preferences of nursing students at two universities in Iran and Malaysia.
METHODS
A purposive sampling method was used to collect data from the two study populations. Data were collected using the Learning Style Scale (LSS), which is a valid and reliable inventory. The LSS consists of 22 items with five subscales including perceptive, solitary, analytic, imaginative, and competitive. The questionnaires were distributed at the end of the academic year during regular class time for optimum response. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the learning style preferences between the two study populations.
RESULTS
A significant difference was found in perceptive, solitary, and analytic learning styles between two groups of nursing students. However, there was no significant difference in imaginative and competitive learning styles between the two groups. Most of the students were in the middle range of the learning styles.
CONCLUSION
There were similarities and differences in learning style preferences between Zabol Medical Sciences University (ZBMU) and University Sains Malaysia (USM) nursing students. The USM nursing students were more sociable and analytic learners, whereas the ZBMU nursing students were more solitary and perceptive learners.

Keyword

Achievement; Consensus; Learning; Nursing students; Questionnaires

MeSH Terms

Consensus
Humans
Iran*
Learning*
Malaysia*
Nursing
Students, Nursing*
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Graf S, Liu TC, Chen NS, Yang SJ. Learning styles and cognitive traits: their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems. Comput Human Behav. 2009; 25:1280–1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.005.

2. Soper DS. A-priori sample size calculator for student t-tests [Internet]. DanielSoper. 2012. [cited 2014 Oct 20]. Available from: http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc.

3. Abdollahimohammad A, Ja’afar R. Learning Style Scales: a valid and reliable questionnaire. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014; 11:22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2014.11.22.

4. Khoza LS, Workman JE. Effects of culture and training on perceptual learning style and spatial task performance in apparel design. Cloth Text Res J. 2009; 27:62–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0887302X07309635.

5. Thomas PR, McKay JB. Cognitive styles and instructional design in university learning. Learn Individ Differ. 2010; 20:197–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.002.

6. Li YS, Chen HM, Yang BH, Liu CF. An exploratory study of the relationship between age and learning styles among students in different nursing programs in Taiwan. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31:18–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.03.014.

7. Whillier S, Lystad RP, Abi-Arrage D, McPhie C, Johnston S, Williams C, Rice M. The learning style preferences of chiropractic students: a cross-sectional study. J Chiropr Educ. 2014; 28:21–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.7899/JCE-13-25.

8. Yong FL. A study on the cultural values, perceptual learning styles, and attitudes toward oracy skills of Malaysian tertiary students. Eur J Soc Sci. 2010; 13:478–492. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/82397.

9. Hallin K. Nursing students at a university: a study about learning style preferences. Nurse Educ Today. 2014; 34:1443–1449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.001.

10. Kahyaoglu M. A comparison between gifted students and non-gifted students’ learning styles and their motivation styles towards science learning. Educ Res Rev. 2013; 8:890–896. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1415.

11. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill;2010.

12. Chauhan S. Cooperative learning versus competitive learning: which is better? Int J Multidiscip Res. 2012; 2:358–364.

13. Zwolsman SE, van Dijk N, Verhoeven AA, de Ruijter W, Wieringa-de Waard M. How learning style affects evidence-based medicine: a survey study. BMC Med Educ. 2011; 11:81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-81.

14. Nuzhat A, Salem RO, Quadri MS, Al-Hamdan N. Learning style preferences of medical students: a single-institute experience from Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Educ. 2011; 2:70–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4e36.d31c.