Cancer Res Treat.  2017 Apr;49(2):526-533. 10.4143/crt.2016.316.

Trends and Age-Period-Cohort Effects on the Incidence and Mortality Rate of Cervical Cancer in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Cancer Registration and Statistics Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. kachas@ncc.re.kr
  • 2Department of Cancer Control and Policy, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. astra67@ncc.re.kr
  • 3Cancer Information and Education Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Center for Uterine Cancer, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.
  • 5Gynecologic Cancer Branch, National Cancer Center Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was conducted to describe the trends and age-period-cohort effects on the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer in Korea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer among ≥ 20-year-old women from 1993 to 2012 were obtained from the Korea Central Cancer Registry and the Korean Statistical Information Service. Age-standardized rates were calculated and Joinpoint regression was used to evaluate the trends in the incidence and mortality rate. Age-period-cohort analysis was performed to investigate the independent effects of age, period and cohort.
RESULTS
The incidence of cervical cancer decreased from 32.8 per 100,000 in 1993 to 15.9 per 100,000 in 2012 (annual percent change [APC], -3.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.2% to -3.6%). The mortality rate decreased from 5.2 per 100,000 in 1993 to 2.1 per 100,000 in 2012 (APC, -4.8%; 95% CI, -5.1% to -4.4%); however, the incidence and mortality rates among young women (< 30 years old) increased. An age-period-cohort model of the incidence and mortality rate showed decreasing period effects between 1993 and 2008 and decreasing cohort effects between 1928 and 1973, while birth cohorts after 1973 exhibited slight increases in the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer.
CONCLUSION
Recent decreases in the incidence and mortality rate of cervical cancer were due to decreases in the period and cohort effects, which reflect the implementation of a cancer screening program and changes in lifestyle. However, our findings also highlighted an increase in cohort effects on the incidence and mortality rate among young women born after 1973.

Keyword

Uterine cervical neoplasms; Incidence; Mortality; Age-period-cohort analysis; Trends

MeSH Terms

Cohort Effect
Cohort Studies
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
Incidence*
Information Services
Korea*
Life Style
Mortality*
Parturition
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms*
Young Adult

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Incidence rates of cervical cancer. (A) The age-specific incidences rates of cervical cancer according to time period; each line connects the age-specific incidence for a 5-year period. (B) The birth cohort–specific incidence rates of cervical cancer according to age group; each line connects the birth cohort–specific incidence for a 5-year age group.

  • Fig. 2. Mortality rates for cervical cancer. (A) The age-specific mortality rates of cervical cancer according to time period; each line connects the age-specific mortality rate for a 5-year period. (B) The birth cohort–specific mortality rates for cervical cancer according to age group; each line connects the birth cohort–specific mortality rate for a 5-year age group.

  • Fig. 3. Age-period-cohort analysis of cervical cancer. (A) The incidences of cervical cancer in Korea. The blue line indicates the age effect and 95% confidence interval, the red line indicates the period effect and 95% confidence interval, and the green line indicates the cohort effect and corresponding 95% confidence interval. (B) The mortality rates for cervical cancer in Korea. The blue line indicates the age effect and 95% confidence interval, the red line indicates the period effect and 95% confidence interval, and the green line indicates the cohort effect and corresponding 95% confidence interval.


Cited by  3 articles

Who Really Benefits from 3D-Based Planning of Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer?
In Bong Ha, Bae Kwon Jeong, Ki Mun Kang, Hojin Jeong, Yun Hee Lee, Hoon Sik Choi, Jong Hak Lee, Won Jun Choi, Jeong Kyu Shin, Jin Ho Song
J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33(18):.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e135.

Updates on Cancer Epidemiology in Korea, 2018
Sun-Seog Kweon
Chonnam Med J. 2018;54(2):90-100.    doi: 10.4068/cmj.2018.54.2.90.

The Prognostic Impact of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and a New Prognostic Scoring System for Recurrence in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer with High Risk Factors: A Multicenter Cohort Study (KROG 15-04)
Jeanny Kwon, Keun-Young Eom, Young Seok Kim, Won Park, Mison Chun, Jihae Lee, Yong Bae Kim, Won Sup Yoon, Jin Hee Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Sei Kyung Chang, Bae Kwon Jeong, Seok Ho Lee, Jihye Cha
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(3):964-974.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.346.


Reference

References

1. Oh CM, Jung KW, Won YJ, Shin A, Kong HJ, Jun JK, et al. Trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive cervical cancer by age group and histological type in Korea from 1993 to 2009. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e72012.
Article
2. Lim MC, Moon EK, Shin A, Jung KW, Won YJ, Seo SS, et al. Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea, 1999-2010. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 24:298–302.
Article
3. Kim CJ, Kim BG, Kim SC, Kim YT, Kim YM, Park SY, et al. Sexual behavior of Korean young women: preliminary study for the introducing of HPV prophylactic vaccine. Korean J Gynecol Oncol. 2007; 18:209–18.
Article
4. Kim YT. Current status of cervical cancer and HPV infection in Korea. J Gynecol Oncol. 2009; 20:1–7.
Article
5. Clayton D, Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I: Age-period and age-cohort models. Stat Med. 1987; 6:449–67.
Article
6. Shin HR, Park S, Hwang SY, Kim JE, Jung KW, Won YJ, et al. Trends in cervical cancer mortality in Korea 1993-2002: corrected mortality using national death certification data and national cancer incidence data. Int J Cancer. 2008; 122:393–7.
Article
7. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Cho H, Lee DH, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 47:127–41.
Article
8. Shin HR, Won YJ, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Yim SH, Lee JK, et al. Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 1999~2001; first result using the national cancer incidence database. Cancer Res Treat. 2005; 37:325–31.
Article
9. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW, Comber H, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49:1374–403.
Article
10. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. 10th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization;1994.
11. Segi M, Fujisaku S. Cancer mortality for selected sites in 24 countries (1950-1957). Sendai: Tohoku University Press;1960.
12. National Cancer Institute. Joinpoint regression program version 3.5.3 [Internet]. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute;2012. [cited 2015 Aug 20]. Available from: http://surveillance.cancer.gov/joinpoint/.
13. Yang Y, Schulhofer‐Wohl S, Fu WJ, Land KC. The intrinsic estimator for age‐period‐cohort analysis: what it is and how to use it. Am J Sociol. 2008; 113:1697–736.
Article
14. Vaccarella S, Franceschi S, Engholm G, Lonnberg S, Khan S, Bray F. 50 years of screening in the Nordic countries: quantifying the effects on cervical cancer incidence. Br J Cancer. 2014; 111:965–9.
Article
15. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000: the global picture. Eur J Cancer. 2001; 37 Suppl 8:S4–66.
Article
16. Dhillon PK, Yeole BB, Dikshit R, Kurkure AP, Bray F. Trends in breast, ovarian and cervical cancer incidence in Mumbai, India over a 30-year period, 1976-2005: an age-period-cohort analysis. Br J Cancer. 2011; 105:723–30.
Article
17. Benard VB, Johnson CJ, Thompson TD, Roland KB, Lai SM, Cokkinides V, et al. Examining the association between socioeconomic status and potential human papillomavirus-associated cancers. Cancer. 2008; 113(10 Suppl):2910–8.
Article
18. Bulk S, Visser O, Rozendaal L, Verheijen RH, Meijer CJ. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women. Int J Cancer. 2005; 113:1005–9.
Article
19. Liu S, Semenciw R, Mao Y. Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women. CMAJ. 2001; 164:1151–2.
20. Wang SS, Sherman ME, Hildesheim A, Lacey JV Jr, Devesa S. Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among white women and black women in the United States for 1976-2000. Cancer. 2004; 100:1035–44.
Article
21. International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Comparison of risk factors for invasive squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 8,097 women with squamous cell carcinoma and 1,374 women with adenocarcinoma from 12 epidemiological studies. Int J Cancer. 2007; 120:885–91.
22. Han CH, Cho HJ, Lee SJ, Bae JH, Bae SN, Namkoong SE, et al. The increasing frequency of cervical cancer in Korean women under 35. Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 40:1–5.
Article
23. Suh M, Choi KS, Lee YY, Jun JK. Trends in cancer screening rates among Korean men and women: results from the Korean national cancer screening survey, 2004-2012. Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 45:86–94.
Article
24. Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, Warren R. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013; 2:35.
Article
25. Aklimunnessa K, Mori M, Khan MM, Sakauchi F, Kubo T, Fujino Y, et al. Effectiveness of cervical cancer screening over cervical cancer mortality among Japanese women. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006; 36:511–8.
Article
26. Chen YY, You SL, Chen CA, Shih LY, Koong SL, Chao KY, et al. Effectiveness of national cervical cancer screening programme in Taiwan: 12-year experiences. Br J Cancer. 2009; 101:174–7.
Article
27. Leung GM, Woo PP, McGhee SM, Cheung AN, Fan S, Mang O, et al. Age-period-cohort analysis of cervical cancer incidence in Hong Kong from 1972 to 2001 using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60:712–20.
Article
28. Yang Y, Fu WJ, Land KC. A methodological comparison of age‐period‐cohort models: the intrinsic estimator and conventional generalized linear models. Sociol Methodol. 2004; 34:75–110.
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr