1. Workowski KA, Berman S. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), Recommendations and reports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention;2010. 59:p. 1–110.
2. Binnicker MJ. Which algorithm should be used to screen for syphilis? Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012; 25:79–85. PMID:
22156894.
Article
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Discordant results from reverse sequence syphilis screening--five laboratories, United States, 2006-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60:133–137. PMID:
21307823.
4. Egglestone SI, Turner AJ. PHLS Syphilis Serology Working Group. Serological diagnosis of syphilis. Commun Dis Public Health. 2000; 3:158–162. PMID:
11014025.
5. French P, Gomberg M, Janier M, Schmidt B, van Voorst Vader P, Young H. IUST. IUSTI: 2008 European Guidelines on the Management of Syphilis. Int J STD AIDS. 2009; 20:300–309. PMID:
19386965.
Article
7. Song EY, Yang JS, Chae SL, Kim S, Choi YS, Cha YJ. Current status of external quality assessment of syphilis test in Korea. Korean J Lab Med. 2008; 28:207–213. PMID:
18594173.
Article
8. Huh HJ, Chae SL, Oh DJ, Park Q, Lim CS, Um TH, et al. Establishment and multicenter evaluation of a national reference panel for syphilis antibodies in Korea. Lab Med Online. 2014; 4:36–42.
Article
9. Watanabe N, Nagatomo R, Okubo S, Yokota H, Ikeda H, Yatomi Y. Evaluation of latex agglutination test for anti-treponemal antibody in comparison with chemical luminescence tests. Rinsho Byori. 2011; 59:115–120. PMID:
21476292.
10. Huh HJ, Chae SL. Analysis of false positive rates and concordance rates in architect syphilis TP assay and Mediace TPLA, automated syphilis serologic tests. Dongguk J Med. 2009; 16:236–242.
11. Noh J, Ko HH, Yun Y, Choi YS, Lee SG, Shin S, et al. Evaluation of performance and false positivity of Mediace RPR test that uses a chemistry autoanalyzer. Korean J Lab Med. 2008; 28:312–318. PMID:
18728382.
Article
12. Kim YS, Lee J, Lee HK, Kim H, Kwon HJ, Min KO, et al. Comparison of quantitative results among two automated Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) assays and a manual RPR test. Korean J Lab Med. 2009; 29:331–337. PMID:
19726896.
Article
13. Binnicker MJ, Jespersen DJ, Rollins LO. Direct comparison of the traditional and reverse syphilis screening algorithms in a population with a low prevalence of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:148–150. PMID:
22090407.
Article
14. Lipinsky D, Schreiber L, Kopel V, Shainberg B. Validation of reverse sequence screening for syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:1501. PMID:
22259212.
Article
15. Cho YH, Kim HO, Lee JB, Lee MG. Syphilis prevalence has rapidly decreased in South Korea. Sex Transm Infect. 2003; 79:323–324. PMID:
12902586.
Article
16. Marangoni A, Moroni A, Accardo S, Cevenini R. Laboratory diagnosis of syphilis with automated immunoassays. J Clin Lab Anal. 2009; 23:1–6. PMID:
19140205.
Article
17. Park IU, Chow JM, Bolan G, Stanley M, Shieh J, Schapiro JM. Screening for syphilis with the treponemal immunoassay: analysis of discordant serology results and implications for clinical management. J Infect Dis. 2011; 204:1297–1304. PMID:
21930610.
Article
18. Loeffelholz MJ, Binnicker MJ. It is time to use treponema-specific antibody screening tests for diagnosis of syphilis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012; 50:2–6. PMID:
22090405.
19. Jost H, Castro A, Cox D, Fakile Y, Kikkert S, Tun Y, et al. A comparison of the analytical level of agreement of nine treponemal assays for syphilis and possible implications for screening algorithms. BMJ Open. 2013; 3:e003347.
Article
20. Tong ML, Lin LR, Liu LL, Zhang HL, Huang SJ, Chen YY, et al. Analysis of 3 algorithms for syphilis serodiagnosis and implications for clinical management. Clin Infect Dis. 2014; 58:1116–1124. PMID:
24550376.
Article
21. González V, Fernández G, Dopico E, Margall N, Esperalba J, Muñoz C, et al. Evaluation of the Vitros Syphilis TPA chemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line method for reverse syphilis screening. J Clin Microbiol. 2015; 53:1361–1364. PMID:
25609729.
Article