Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.  2016 Dec;32(4):263-273. 10.14368/jdras.2016.32.4.263.

A literature review on implant abutment and soft tissue response

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea. lila@gwnu.ac.kr

Abstract

In the implant prosthetic procedure, the soft tissue reaction was varied with the material and surface treatment of the abutment. It may be the cause of the peri-implantitis, and hence it can affect the long-term prognosis of the implant prosthesis. Titania and zirconia abutment presented superior biocompatibility and stable soft tissue reaction, while gold alloy abutment showed unfavorable reaction sometimes. A soft tissue reaction can be differed by the surface characteristics even in the same material type. Because rougher surface induces a bacterial attachment, the part contacting a soft tissue should have smooth surface. Additional surface treatment can enhance the cellular response without increasing bacterial attachment. Repeated removal and insertion of the abutment and the shape of the abutment may affect the soft tissue reaction, also. Ultrasonic cleaning and argon plasma cleaning are effective way to clean the retained micro-dust on the customized abutment.

Keyword

abutment material; surface treatment; cellular response; bacterial attachment; custom abutment

MeSH Terms

Alloys
Argon
Peri-Implantitis
Plasma
Prognosis
Prostheses and Implants
Ultrasonics
Alloys
Argon
Full Text Links
  • JDRAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr