J Korean Med Assoc.  2010 Nov;53(11):1017-1027.

Factors influencing on review adjustment rate in National Health Insurance: focusing on outpatient services in clinics

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Healthcare Management, Soonchunhyang University College of Medical Science, Cheonan, Korea.
  • 2Research Department, Health Insurance Review&Assessment Service, Seoul, Korea. sera5005@hiramail.net
  • 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Korea.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the adjustment amount for outpatient services of clinics and to identify the factors affecting the variation of the cost between clinics in National Health Insurance in South Korea. Adjustment rate in the process of claims data review was defined as the percentage of the adjusted amount in the total claimed amount. From a total of 23,593 clinics in South Korea, 4,160 clinics accounting for 17.6% of total were selected for the study. The National Health Insurance claim data were collected during April 2007. To identify factors affecting the variation in adjustment rate between clinics, multiple regression method was used for the analysis. Older physicians were more likely to have high adjustment rate. General practitioners, orthopedic surgeons, and family physicians were more likely to have higher adjustment rate than those of internists. Physicians who have practiced between 1 and 10 years and physicians practicing in metropolitan areas had lower than their counterparts. There was a great variation in adjustment rate among physicians and the variation was affected by physicians' clinical behaviors as well as the characteristics of the clinics. Therefore, introduction of an effective management scheme for physicians' clinical behaviors is essential. Since many review adjustment occur due to the incomplete understanding about the review criteria and rules and procedure of claiming, continuing education will be a way of preventing these unnecessary review adjustments. The fact that no review adjustments were found even from the close-review implies that the current two-tiered review system (close-review and indicator-review) is an efficient way of review. Future studies are needed to classify possible cause of review adjustment such as simple errors, errors in applying the benefit scheme, and over use of services.

Keyword

Review; Adjustment amount; Adjustment rate

MeSH Terms

Accounting
Education, Continuing
General Practitioners
Humans
National Health Programs
Orthopedics
Outpatients
Physicians, Family
Republic of Korea

Reference

1. Kim HJ. Improvement of claims review and payment system in health insurance. 1989. Seoul: Health Insurance Association.
2. No IC, Lee CS. Improvement of payment and review system in health insurance. 1994. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs.
3. Yu SH, Oh DG, Ohrr HC, Kim HJ. A study on simplifying of health insurance costs. 1982. Seoul: Korea Medical Insurance Corporation.
4. Yeon HC, Park JK, Min JS, Han DS, Park JY, Kim IS, Hong JD, Kim HY, editors. Future and political agenda in health insurance. 1983. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.
5. Kim IS, Yu SH, Kim HJ. A study on process improvement of claims review and payment system in health insurance. 1983. Seoul: Institute of Population and Health Development of Yonsei University.
6. Kim IS, Kim HJ, Lee YD. Development and utilization of computational screening criteria. 1984. Seoul: Institute of Population and Health Development of Yonsei University.
7. Yu SH, Chae YM, Kim HJ, Cho WH, Lee YH. A study on computerized management system in health insurance. 1985. Seoul: Institute of Population and Health Development of Yonsei University.
8. Kim SI, Kang HG, Kim HJ, Chae YM, Sohn M, Lee MK. A methodological study on simplifying claims review system in medical insurance. Korean J Prev Med. 1995. 28(3):640–650.
9. Seoul National University College of Medicine. A study on the foundation and operating plan for HIRA. 1999. Seoul: Seoul National University College of Medicine.
10. Moon YR, editor. Health assurance. 1991. Seoul: Shin-Kwang Press.
11. Park HY. A study on the improvement of review process and the development of cost-effective claims' review method. 2002. Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.
12. Kim Y. The development of cost-effective claims' review method: focusing on sampling method. 2005. Seoul: Seoul National University College of Medicine, Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.
13. Kim S, Kim JH, Choi JS, Yoo YA. The improvement of selection criteria for close-review targets. 2007. Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.
14. Kim S, Kim JH. A study on changes in physician behavior after enforcing pre-review system. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2004. 14:88–113.
Article
15. Park IB. The impact of comprehensive management for appropriate medical service (CMA) in physician's prescribing and medical service patterns [dissertation]. 2007. Seoul: Yonsei University.
Full Text Links
  • JKMA
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr