Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2015 Mar;56(3):388-395. 10.3341/jkos.2015.56.3.388.

Outpatient Distribution for Glaucoma Evaluation

Affiliations
  • 1Nune Eye Hospital, Seoul, Korea. youngjhong@gmail.com

Abstract

PURPOSE
To analyze the reasons for glaucoma evaluation and distribution of new patients visiting the glaucoma department.
METHODS
In a retrospective study, 330 new patients underwent ocular examination using Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, optic disc analysis, optical coherence tomography, and Humphrey perimeter under suspicion of glaucoma for the first time in the Glaucoma Department from January 2013 to December 2013. We analyzed the reasons and their diagnostic outcomes.
RESULTS
The reasons for glaucoma evaluation were health screening (103 patients, 32.49%), other symptoms (102 patients, 31.55%), known glaucoma (56 patients, 17.67%), pre-refractive surgery evaluation (31 patients, 9.78%), family history (19 patients, 5.99%), and high myopia (6 patients, 1.89%). The diagnostic outcomes were as follows: glaucoma (139 patients, 43.85%), glaucoma suspect (60 patients, 18.93%), ocular hypertension (9 patients, 2.84%), neither glaucoma nor ocular hypertension (79 patients, 24.92%), normal (30 patients, 9.46%). The percentages of confirmed glaucoma according to the reasons for glaucoma evaluation were as follows: health screening, 26.21%; other symptoms, 40.20%; known glaucoma, 85.71%; pre-refractive surgery evaluation, 58.06%; family history, 15.79% and high myopia, 33.33%.
CONCLUSIONS
The reasons for glaucoma evaluation were diverse. Glaucoma was confirmed in 43.85% of the patients and the predicted value of positive test for glaucoma including glaucoma suspect and ocular hypertension was 65.62%.

Keyword

Distribution; Glaucoma; New patients; Reasons

MeSH Terms

Glaucoma*
Gonioscopy
Humans
Manometry
Mass Screening
Myopia
Ocular Hypertension
Outpatients*
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, Optical Coherence
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr