J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs.  2015 Mar;24(1):1-11. 10.12934/jkpmhn.2015.24.1.1.

Usage Patterns of Nursing Diagnoses among Student Nurses in Psychiatric Unit: Relation with NANDA and SNOMED CT

• Hong H
• Park J
• Park W

• KMID: 2322785
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2015.24.1.1

Abstract

PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to explore how nursing diagnoses are made by undergraduate students of psychiatric unit in Korea.
METHODS
Data were collected from case reports and analyzed based on NANDA (North American Nursing Diagnosis Association) nursing diagnoses and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) as reference terminology.
RESULTS
The 30 different nursing diagnoses from 135 distinct nursing diagnosis statements were assessed after removing repetition of case studies from a of total of 1,140 statements of nursing diagnoses. The most frequently used NANDA diagnosis was "ineffective coping" The thirty nursing diagnoses were grouped under 10 out of the 13 NANDA domains. In addition, 98 related factors were classified into SNOMED CT hierarchies of Clinical Finding, Procedure, and Observable Entity. The content validity index for the mapping of nursing diagnoses was 0.97, indicating a relatively strong agreement.
CONCLUSION
These results can help students to improve their knowledge and better formulate appropriate diagnoses. Using standardized terminology would improve competency of education and help to ratify the steps of the nursing process, especially nursing planning. Educational strategies that enhance diagnostic accuracy are recommended.

Keyword

Psychiatric nursing; Nursing diagnoses; Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine

MeSH Terms

Diagnosis
Education
Humans
Korea
Nursing
Nursing Diagnosis*
Nursing Process
Psychiatric Nursing
Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine*

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Research design.

Reference

1. Repique RJR. Computers and information technologies in psychiatric nursing. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2007; 43(2):77–83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6163.2007.00083.x.

2. Townsend MC. Nursing diagnoses in psychiatric nursing: care plansand psychotropic medications. 8th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company;2010. p. 696.

3. Park JE, Chung KA, Cho H, Kim HS. Construction of the nursing diagnosis ontology in obstetrics and gynecology nursing unit using nursing process and SNOMED CT. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2013; 19(1):1–12.

4. von Krogh G, Dale C, Naden D. A framework for integrating NANDA, NIC, and NOC terminology in electronic patient records. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005; 37(3):275–281. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00047.x.

5. Hong WH, Lundeen SP. Using ACHIS to analyze nursing health promotion interventions for vulnerable populations in a community nursing center: a pilot study. Asian Nurs Res. 2009; 3(3):130–138. DOI: 10.1016/S19761317(09)60024-4.

6. Bulechek GM, Butcher H, Dochterman JM. Nursing interventions classification (NIC). 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier;2008. p. 938.

7. American Nurses Association. What is nursing? the nursing process. [Internet]. 2012. cited 2014 May 7. Available from: http://nursingworld.org/EspeciallyForYou/What-is-Nursing/Tools-You-Need/.

8. NANDA International. NANDA International Nursing diagnoses, definitions and classification 2012-2014. 1st ed. Seoul: Jeongdam Media;2013. p. 495.

9. Johnson M, Moorhead S, Bulechek G, Butcher HK, Mass ML, Swanson E. NOC and NIC linkages to NANDA-I and clinical conditions: supporting critical reasoning and quality care. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier;2012. p. 40.

10. Lundber C, Warren J, Brokel J, Bulecheck G, Butcher H, Mc-Closkey Dochterman, et al. Selecting a standardized terminology for the electronic health record that reveals the impact of nursing on patient care. Online J Nurs Inform. 2008; 12(2):1–20.

11. Benson T. Principles of health interoperability HL7 and SNOMED. 2nd ed. London: Springer;2012. p. 173–215.

12. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization. SNOMED CT. [Internet]. 2010. cited 2014 April 15. Available from: http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/.

13. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization. SNOMED CT starter guide. [Internet]. 2014. 02. cited 2014 April 20. Available from: http://ihtsdo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/doc/.

14. Polit DM, Beck CT. Nursing research: principles and methods. 7th ed. Philadelpia: Lipincott, Williams & Wilkins;2004. p. 328–350.

15. Kim JK. A study on nursing diagnoses, interventions, outcomes frequently used and linkage to NANDA-NOC-NIC in major nursing departments. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2010; 16(2):121–142. DOI: 10.11111/jkana.2010.16.2.121.

16. Doenges ME, Moorhouse MF, Murr AC. Nurse's pocket guide: diagnoses, prioritized intervention and rationales. 11th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company;2008. p. 968.

17. Ko SH. An analysis of nursing diagnoses of schizophrenic patients. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1995; 4(2):60–77.

18. Kim SY, Kim SA, Nam KA, Lee HH, Kim HL. Analysis of nursing diagnoses in schizophrenic patients. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003; 12(2):191–203.

19. Nursel A, Neriman A. Determination of accuracy of nursing diagnoses used by nursing students in their nursing care plans. Int J Caring Sci. 2013; 6(2):252–257.

20. Lee SJ, Lee MY. Analysis of nursing intervention studies published by the Journal of Korean academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing using the NANDA, NIC and NOC. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007; 16(4):377–388.