Tuberc Respir Dis.  2012 Apr;72(4):381-385.

Second Complete Remission of Relapsed Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Retreatment

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital & Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea. sykim@cnu.ac.kr

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer related deaths. Most patients were presented with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. In advanced NSCLC, it is almost impossible to anticipate complete remission by using only cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecularly targeted agents. In our case, two patients were diagnosed as advanced NSCLC and received chemotherapy. They achieved complete response (CR). After finishing treatment, disease recurred. They were retreated with the same regimens and achieved second CR. Until now, they have received each regimen, continuously, and the CR state has been maintained.

Keyword

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Remission Induction; Retreatment; Maintenance Chemotherapy

MeSH Terms

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
Humans
Maintenance Chemotherapy
Remission Induction
Retreatment

Figure

  • Figure 1 Summary from the initial diagnostic investigation to last follow-up. (A~C) Initial diagnostic investigation. (A) Chest computed tomography (CT). (B) Bronchoscopy. (C) Bronchoscopic biopsy (H&E stain, ×400). (D~F) Response evaluation after third-line pemetrexed treatment. *Indicates hyroiditis confirmed by fine needle aspiration. (G~I) Response evaluation at 9 months after discontinuation of pemetrexed treatment. (J~L) Second complete response state after four cycles of pemetrexed retreatment. #Indicates fibrotic scar after CyberKnife treatment. (D, G, J) Chest CT. (E, F, H, I, K, L) Positron emission tomography-CT.

  • Figure 2 Summary from the initial diagnostic investigation to last follow-up. (A~C) Initial diagnostic investigation. (A) Chest X-ray. (B) Chest computed tomography (CT). (C) Lung biopsy (H&E stain, ×200). (D) Response evaluation after 5 months treatment. (E, F) Response evaluation after 13 months treatment. (G~I) Response evaluation at 5 months after discontinuation of erlotinib treatment. (J, K) Second complete response state after 2 months of erlotinib retreatment. (D, G, J) Chest CT. (E, F, H, I, K) Positron emission tomography-CT. (L) Chest CT (July 2011).


Reference

1. DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. 2005. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
2. Lee SY, Park JY. Personalized therapy in lung cancer: focused on molecular targeted therapy. J Lung Cancer. 2011. 10:1–12.
3. Cappuzzo F, Ciuleanu T, Stelmakh L, Cicenas S, Szczésna A, Juhász E, et al. Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2010. 11:521–529.
4. Yokouchi H, Yamazaki K, Kinoshita I, Konishi J, Asahina H, Sukoh N, et al. Clinical benefit of readministration of gefitinib for initial gefitinib-responders with non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. 2007. 7:51.
5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: small cell lung cancer. 2011. v.3. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
6. Cara S, Tannock IF. Retreatment of patients with the same chemotherapy: implications for clinical mechanisms of drug resistance. Ann Oncol. 2001. 12:23–27.
Full Text Links
  • TRD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr