Restor Dent Endod.  2015 Nov;40(4):255-261. 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.255.

The effect of different drinks on the color stability of different restorative materials after one month

• Tekce N
• Tuncer S
• Demirci M
• Serim ME
• Baydemir C

• KMID: 2316944
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.255

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different drinks on the color parameters of four different restorative materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three different composites (Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative, Filtek Ultimate Flowable, and Filtek Silorane, 3M ESPE) and a polyacid-modified composite resin material (Dyract XP, Dentsply DeTrey GmbH) were evaluated. Eighty-four disc-shaped specimens of 8 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness were prepared (n = 21 each). Color coordinates (L*a*b*, DeltaL*, Deltaa*, Deltab*, and DeltaE*) were measured using a VITA Easyshade Compact (VITA Zahnfabrik) after 24 hr of storage (baseline) and after 30 day of storage in three different beverages of black tea, Coca cola, or water (control) (n = 7). In each beverage, the specimens were stored three times a day, one hr each, for 30 day. The color changes (DeltaE) were calculated and were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn multiple comparison test.
RESULTS
The color difference (DeltaE*) of the resin materials ranged between 1.31 and 15.28 after 30 day of immersion in the staining solutions. Dyract XP in Coca cola (15.28 +/- 2.61) and black tea (12.22 +/- 2.73) showed the highest mean DeltaE* value after 30 day, followed by Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (5.99 +/- 1.25) and Filtek Ultimate Flowable (4.71 +/- 1.40) in black tea (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
The compomers displayed unacceptable color changes at the end of 30 day in all beverages. Among resin composites, the silorane based composite exhibited relatively good color stability than the others. Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative and Filtek Flowable showed similar color changes in all beverages.

Keyword

Color stability; Compomer; Drinks; Nanocomposite; Silorane

MeSH Terms

Beverages
Coca
Cola
Compomers
Immersion
Nanocomposites
Silorane Resins
Tea
Water
Compomers
Silorane Resins
Tea
Water

Reference

1. Craig R, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental materials properties and manipulation. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby;2000. p. 145–156.

2. Brandt WC, Lacerda RF, Souza-Junior EJ, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of photoactivation mode on the hardness and bond strength of methacrylate- and Silorane monomer-based composites. J Adhes Dent. 2013; 15:33–39.

3. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2004; 29:275–279.

4. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigation on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:348–355.

5. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105:97–116.

6. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymer dental composites. Prog Polym Sci. 2001; 26:535–576.

7. Moszner N, Fischer UK, Angermann J, Rheinberger V. A partially aromatic urethane dimethacrylate as a new substitute for Bis-GMA in restorative composites. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:694–699.

8. Marghalani HY. Effect of filler particles on surface roughness of experimental composite series. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18:59–67.

9. Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL Jr, Rodrigues AL Jr. Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent. 2000; 13:136–138.

10. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials. 1998; 19:529–539.

11. Federlin M, Thonemann B, Schmalz G, Urlinger T. Clinical evaluation of different adhesive systems for restoring teeth with erosion lesions. Clin Oral Investig. 1998; 2:58–66.

12. Bayne S, Thompson G, Taylor D. Dental Materials. In : Roberson TM, Heyman HO, Swift EJ, editors. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby;2002. p. 135–234.

13. Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins-an in vitro study. J Dent. 2010; 38:Suppl 2. e137–e142.

14. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-simulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005; 33:389–398.

15. Dietschi D, Campanile G, Holz J, Meyer JM. Comparison of the color stability of ten new-generation composites: an in vitro study. Dent Mater. 1994; 10:353–362.

16. Dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, De Oliveira AL, Chinelatti MA, Palma-Dibb RG. Chemical and morphological features of dental composite resin: influence of light curing units and immersion media. Microsc Res Tech. 2010; 73:176–181.

17. Janda R, Roulet JF, Kaminsky M, Steffin G, Latta M. Color stability of resin matrix restorative materials as a function of the method of light activation. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004; 112:280–285.

18. Taşkınsel E, Ozel E, Oztürk E. Effects of sports beverages and polishing systems on color stability of different resin composites. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17:325–329.

19. Garcia PPNS, Neto ER, dos Santos PA, Campos JADB, Dibb RGP. Influence of surface sealant on the translucency of composite resin: effect of immersion time and immersion media. J Mater Res. 2008; 11:193–197.

20. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier;2003. p. 46–51.

21. Liberman R, Combe EC, Piddock V, Pawson C, Watts DC. Development and assessment of an objective method of colour change measurement for acrylic denture base resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1995; 22:445–449.

22. Kim EH, Jung KH, Son SA, Hur B, Kwon YH, Park JK. Effect of resin thickness on the microhardness and optical properties of bulk-fill resin composites. Restor Dent Endod. 2015; 40:128–135.

23. Janda R, Roulet JF, Latta M, Steffin G, Rüttermann S. Color stability of resin-based filling materials after aging when cured with plasma or halogen light. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005; 113:251–257.

24. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003; 19:12–18.

25. Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangaç B, Ozgünaltay G. The effect of curing units and staining solutions on the color stability of resin composites. Oper Dent. 2007; 32:616–622.

26. Villalta P, Lu H, Okte Z, Gracia-Godoy F, Powers JM. Effects of staining solutions and bleaching on color change of dental composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; 95:137–142.

27. Reddy PS, Tejaswi KL, Shetty S, Annapoorna BM, Pujari SC, Thippeswamy HM. Effects of commonly consumed beverages on surface roughness and color stability of the nano, microhybrid and hybrid composite resins: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013; 14:718–723.

28. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ, Marquis PM, Randall RC. The influence of short and medium-term water immersion on the hydrolytic stability of novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:852–863.

29. Eick JD, Smith RE, Pinzino CS, Kostoryz EL. Stability of silorane dental monomers in aqueous systems. J Dent. 2006; 34:405–410.

30. Prodan DA, Gasparik C, Mada DC, Miclăuş V, Băciuţ M, Dudea D. Influence of opacity on the color stability of a nanocomposite. Clin Oral Investig. 2015; 19:867–875.

31. Ergün G, Mutlu-Sagesen L, Ozkan Y, Demirel E. In vitro color stability of provisional crown and bridge restoration materials. Dent Mater J. 2005; 24:342–350.

32. Malekipour MR, Sharafi A, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Shirani F. Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012; 9:441–446.

33. Ortengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U, Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH and storage time on the sorption and solubility behavior of three composite resin materials. J Dent. 2001; 29:35–41.