Lab Med Online.  2012 Oct;2(4):183-187.

Should I Repeat My 1:2s QC Rejection?

Affiliations
  • 1Bio-Rad Laboratories, Quality Systems Division, Plano, TX, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Repeating a QC that is outside 2SD from the mean (1:2s rule) appears to be a common practice. Although this form of repeat-sampling is frowned on by many, the comparative power of the approach has not been formally evaluated.
METHODS
We computed power functions mathematically and by computer simulation for 4 different 1:2s repeat-sampling strategies, as well as the 1:2s rule, the 1:3s rule, and 2 common QC multirules.
RESULTS
The false-rejection rates for the repeat-sampling strategies were similarly low to those of the 1:3s QC rule. The error detection rates for the repeat-sampling strategies approached those of the 1:2s QC rule for moderate to large out-of-control error conditions. In most cases, the power of the repeat-sampling strategies was superior to the power of the QC multirules we evaluated. The increase in QC utilization rate ranged from 4% to 13% for the repeat-sampling strategies investigated.
CONCLUSIONS
The repeat-sampling strategies provide an effective tactic to take advantage of the desirable properties of both the 1:2s and 1:3s QC rules. Additionally, the power of the repeat-sampling strategies compares favorably with the power of 2 common QC multirules. These improvements come with a modest increase in the average number of controls tested.

Full Text Links
  • LMO
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Copyright © 2020 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr