Korean J Urol.  2008 Jan;49(1):82-87.

A 10-Year Retrospective Study of the Operative Treatment Results of Adult Type Hydrocele

• Kim JK
• Shin JH
• Lim JS

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although hydrocelectomy is commonly performed in general urological practice, the incidence of complications and the outcomes of this procedure seem to be underreported in the literature. We evaluated the incidence of complications and the outcomes of patients who underwent hydrocelectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Between January 1996 and December 2005, 289 patients with hydrocele were retrospectively assigned into three groups according to the degree of dissection or the amount of the excision of the hydrocele sac. Group 1 included 78 patients who were treated by dissection and excision of the entire hydrocele sac. Group 2 consisted of 149 patients who were treated by dissection and eversion of the hydrocele sac. The 62 patients in group 3 underwent operations in which there was little or no dissection of the hydrocele. We analyzed the complications, the effects of surgical treatment and the results according to the surgical techniques.
RESULTS
The duration of recovery showed no differences among the three groups. The overall complication rate was 36.3%. Transient scrotal swelling occurred in 28.0% of the patients, hematoma in 2.7%, wound infection in 1.7%, and injury to the epididymis or testis, chronic pain and persistent swelling occurred in 1.3%. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower among the patients in group 3. The rate of scrotal swelling was significantly correlated to the volume of the hydroceles and the amount of the excision of the hydrocele sac.
CONCLUSIONS
The long term results of hydrocelectomy were good. The most common complications following scrotal surgery for hydroceles were scrotal swelling, hematoma, wound infection and injury to the epididymis and testis. Most of the complications were treated by conservative management.

Keyword

Hydrocelectomy; Scrotal swelling

MeSH Terms

Adult
Chronic Pain
Epididymis
Hematoma
Humans
Incidence
Male
Postoperative Complications
Retrospective Studies
Testis
Wound Infection

Reference

1. Huggins CB, Entz FH. Absorption from normal tunica vaginalis testis hydrocele and spermatocele. J Urol. 1931. 25:447.

2. Haynes JH. Inguinal and scrotal disorders. Surg Clin North Am. 2006. 86:371–381.

3. Epstein A, Novicki DE. Management of hydroceles. AUA update series VII Lesson. 1988. 19:145–149.

4. Moloney GE. Comparison of results of treatment of hydrocele and epididymal cysts by surgery and injection. Br Med J. 1975. 3:478–479.

5. Rodriguez WC, Rodriguez DD, Fortuno RF. The operative treatment of hydrocele: a comparison of 4 basic techniques. J Urol. 1981. 125:804–805.

6. Kim JK, Park YI. A clinical observation on hydrocele. Korean J Urol. 1983. 24:115–118.

7. Andrew EW. The "bottle operation" method for the radical cure of hydrocele. Ann Surg. 1907. 46:915–918.

8. Lyon JM. Chirurgie des centres nerveux, des ciscere et des membres. Storck. 1902. 2:192.

9. Lord PH. A bloodless operation for the radical cure of idiopathic hydrocele. Br J Surg. 1964. 51:914–916.

10. Solomon AA. The extrusion operation for hydrocele. N Y State J Med. 1955. 55:1885–1887.

11. Wilkinson JL. An operation for large scrotal hydrocele. Br J Surg. 1973. 60:450–452.

12. Swartz MA, Morgan TM, Krieger JN. Complications of scrotal surgery for benign conditions. Urology. 2007. 69:616–619.

13. Osterling JE. Scrotal surgery: a reliable method for the prevention of postoperative hematoma and edema. J Urol. 1990. 143:1201–1202.

14. Manson AL, MacDonald G. "Turban" scrotal dressing. J Urol. 1987. 137:238–239.

15. Waldron R, James M, Clain A. Technique and results of trans-scrotal operations for hydrocele and scrotal cysts. Br J Urol. 1986. 58:303–306.

16. Albrecht W, Holtl W, Aharinejad S. Lord's procedure-the best operation for hydrocele? Br J Urol. 1991. 68:187–189.

17. Ku JH, Kim ME, Lee NK, Park YH. The excisional, plication and internal drainage techniques: a comparison of the results for idiopathic hydrocele. BJU Int. 2001. 87:82–84.