Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.  1998 Mar;31(3):242-246.

Reoperation for Dysfunction of Cardiac Valve Prosthesis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

From January 1988 to December 1995, 27 patients, 11 men and 16 women, underwent surgical intervention at our institution for prosthetic valve dysfunctions. The mean age was 43.5+/-12.2 years. Seventeen (63.0%) patients had the mitral valve replacement, 8 (29.6%) the aortic valve, 1 (3.7%) the aortic composite graft, and 1 (3.7%) the tricuspid valve. Mean follow-up period was 49.5+/-30.9 months. In 12 bioprostheses, mean interval between the previous valve replacement and the reoperation was 104.9+/-34.9 months. The causes of redo surgery were structural deterioration of the prosthetic valve (12/12, 100%), paravalvular leak (2/12, 16.7%), and prosthetic valve endocarditis (1/12, 8.3%). In 15 mechanical prostheses, the mean interval was 55.2+/-43.7 months. The causes of redo surgery were pannus formation (8/15, 53.3%), paravalvular leak (4/15, 26.7%), and valve thrombosis (3/15, 20.0%). Posto-perative complications occurred in 7 patients (25.9%). There was no intraoperative death. But one patient, who received mechanical aortic valve replacement died on the 3rd postoperative day due to low cardiac output and multiorgan failure.

Keyword

Prosthesis; failure; Heart valve replacement; Reoperation

MeSH Terms

Aortic Valve
Bioprosthesis
Cardiac Output, Low
Endocarditis
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Heart Valve Prosthesis*
Heart Valves*
Humans
Male
Mitral Valve
Prostheses and Implants
Reoperation*
Thrombosis
Transplants
Tricuspid Valve
Full Text Links
  • KJTCS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr