J Adv Prosthodont.  2014 Dec;6(6):456-461. 10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.456.

Comparative analysis of transmittance for different types of commercially available zirconia and lithium disilicate materials

• Harianawala HH
• Kheur MG
• Apte SK
• Kale BB
• Sethi TS
• Kheur SM

• KMID: 2284718
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.6.456

Abstract

PURPOSE
Translucency and colour stability are two most important aspects for an aesthetic dental restoration. Glass ceramic restorations are popular amongst clinicians because of their superior aesthetic properties. In the last decade, zirconia has generated tremendous interest due to its favorable mechanical and biological properties. However, zirconia lacks the translucency that lithium disilicate materials possess and therefore has limitations in its use, especially in esthetically demanding situations. There has been a great thrust in research towards developing translucent zirconia materials for dental restorations. The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the transmittance of a translucent variant of zirconia to lithium disilicate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two commercially available zirconia materials (conventional and high translucency) and 2 lithium disilicate materials (conventional and high translucency) with standardized dimensions were fabricated. Transmittance values were measured for all samples followed by a microstructural analysis using a finite element scanning electron microscope. One way analysis of variance combined with a Tukey-post hoc test was used to analyze the data obtained (P=.05).
RESULTS
High translucency lithium disilicate showed highest transmittance of all materials studied, followed by conventional lithium disilicate, high translucency zirconia and conventional zirconia. The difference between all groups of materials was statistically significant. The transmittance of the different materials correlated to their microstructure analysis.
CONCLUSION
Despite manufacturers' efforts to make zirconia significantly more translucent, the transmittance values of these materials still do not match conventional lithium disilicate. More research is required on zirconia towards making the material more translucent for its potential use as esthetic monolithic restoration.

Keyword

Aesthetics; Lithium disilicate; Translucency; Transmittance; Zirconia

MeSH Terms

Ceramics
Esthetics
Glass
Lithium*
Ceramics
Lithium

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 UV spectrophotometer.

• 

  Fig. 2 Sample holder with 8.5 mm slot placed in the. UV spectrophotometer.

• 

  Fig. 3 Samples of Group 1 - 4 arranged sequentially from left to right held against daylight.

• 

  Fig. 4 Scanning electron microscopic image of high translucency zirconia.

• 

  Fig. 5 Scanning electron microscopic image of conventional zirconia.

• 

  Fig. 6 Scanning electron microscopic image of commercially available lithium disilicate.

• 

  Fig. 7 Scanning electron microscopic image of high translucency lithium disilicate.

Reference

1. Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56:84–96.

2. Durán P, Villegas M, Fernández JF, Capel F, Moure C. Theoretically dense and nanostructured ceramics by pressureless sintering of nanosized Y-TZP powders. Mater Sci Eng A. 1997; 232:168–176.

3. Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1506–1511.

4. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Augthun M, Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14:231–238.

5. Mizrahi B. The anterior all-ceramic crown: a rationale for the choice of ceramic and cement. Br Dent J. 2008; 205:251–255.

6. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92:557–562.

7. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98:389–404.

8. Dias MC, Piva E, de Moraes RR, Ambrosano GM, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. UV-Vis spectrophotometric analysis and light irradiance through hot-pressed and hot-pressed-veneered glass ceramics. Braz Dent J. 2008; 19:197–203.

9. Tsukuma K, Yamashita I, Kusunose T. Transparent 8 mol% Y₂O₃-ZrO₂ (8Y) Ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc. 2008; 91:813–818.

10. Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater. 2008; 24:1506–1511.

11. Sailer I, Fehér A, Filser F, Lüthy H, Gauckler LJ, Schärer P, Franz Hämmerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int. 2006; 37:685–693.

12. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby;2006. p. 262–643.

13. Yu B, Ahn JS, Lee YK. Measurement of translucency of tooth enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009; 67:57–64.

14. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:4–9.

15. Heffernan MJ, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM, Haselton DR, Stanford CM, Vargas MA. Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:10–15.

16. Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res. 1995; 74:1253–1258.

17. Brodbelt RH, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of dental porcelains. J Dent Res. 1980; 59:70–75.

18. Kim MJ, Ahn JS, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Effects of the sintering conditions of dental zirconia ceramics on the grain size and translucency. J Adv Prosthodont. 2013; 5:161–166.

19. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14:316–320.

20. Zhang Y, Griggs JA, Benham AW. Influence of powder/liquid mixing ratio on porosity and translucency of dental porcelains. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 91:128–135.

21. Alaniz JE, Perez-Gutierrez FG, Aguilar G, Garay JE. Optical properties of transparent nanocrystalline yttria stabilized zirconia. Opt Mater. 2009; 32:62–68.

22. Succaria F, Morgano SM. Prescribing a dental ceramic material: Zirconia vs lithium-disilicate. Saudi Dent J. 2011; 23:165–166.

23. Vichi A, Louca C, Corciolani G, Ferrari M. Color related to ceramic and zirconia restorations: a review. Dent Mater. 2011; 27:97–108.

24. Johnson LD. Microwave and plasma sintering of ceramics. Ceram Int. 1991; 17:295–300.