Ann Rehabil Med.  2011 Jun;35(3):361-368. 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.361.

The Thickness of the Sternocleidomastoid Muscle as a Prognostic Factor for Congenital Muscular Torticollis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 442-749, Korea. syyim@ajou.ac.kr
  • 2Hwaseong City Health Center, Hwaseong 445-920, Korea.
  • 3Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon 442-749, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To examine whether the thickness of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) could be used as a prognostic factor for congenital muscular torticollis (CMT). METHOD: This was a retrospective study conducted in a pediatric rehabilitation service at a tertiary medical center. Fifty-two children who met the following inclusion criteria were included: 1) children who were 3 month-old or younger, 2) children diagnosed with CMT, 3) passive rotation of the face toward the shoulder of the tilted side < or =60degrees, 4) children who had been managed according to the clinical pathway for CMT, 5) children who had been followed up for 6 months or more after the end of treatment. The duration and total number of stretching exercise sessions were reviewed with reference to the thickness of the SCM.
RESULTS
Among the 52 children with CMT, 46 children were successfully managed with only stretching exercise of the SCM for 1-6 weeks (group 1: 88.5%) and 6 children were managed with botulinum toxin A injection, surgical release or both in addition to stretching exercise (group 2: 11.5%). The difference in the SCM thickness between the affected and normal sides was significantly greater in group 2 than that in group 1 (p=0.026). A strong correlation was found between the total duration of stretching exercise and the difference in the SCM thickness in group 1 (Pearson' gamma=0.429; p=0.003).
CONCLUSION
Children with a thicker SCM seem to require a longer duration of stretching exercise and other therapeutic interventions in addition to stretching exercise for CMT. Therefore, the thickness of the SCM may be one prognostic factor for CMT treatment.

Keyword

Torticollis; Sternocleidomastoid; Ultrasonography; Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Botulinum Toxins
Child
Critical Pathways
Humans
Muscles
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Shoulder
Torticollis
Botulinum Toxins
Torticollis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Clinical pathway for treatment of children with congenital muscular torticollis.

  • Fig. 2 Regression analysis of the duration of stretching exercise and the side-to-side sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle thickness difference (DIFF) in group 1. Duration of stretching exercises for CMT (DUR in days)=-0.487+3.051 (DIFF in mm) with an adjusted R2 of 0.166 (p=0.003).


Cited by  3 articles

Factors That Affect the Rehabilitation Duration in Patients With Congenital Muscular Torticollis
Ah Young Jung, Eun Young Kang, Sung Hoon Lee, Doo Hyeon Nam, Ji Hwan Cheon, Hyo Jung Kim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(1):18-24.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.1.18.

Quantitative Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Neck and Its Usefulness in Management of Congenital Muscular Torticollis
Jong Woo Kim, Seung Hyun Kim, Shin-Young Yim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(2):294-302.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.294.

Clinical Usefulness of Sonoelastography in Infants With Congenital Muscular Torticollis
Seong Kyung Hong, Jin Won Song, Seung Beom Woo, Jong Min Kim, Tae Eun Kim, Zee Ihn Lee
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(1):28-33.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.1.28.


Reference

1. Yim SY, Lee IY, Park MC, Kim JH. Differential diagnosis and management of abnormal posture of the head and neck. J Korean Med Assoc. 2009; 52:705–718.
Article
2. Chen MM, Chang HC, Hsieh CF, Yen MF, Chen TH. Predictive model for congenital muscular torticollis: analysis of 1021 infants with sonography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86:2199–2203. PMID: 16271571.
Article
3. Cheng JC, Au AW. Infantile torticollis: a review of 624 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994; 14:802–808. PMID: 7814599.
4. Cheng JC, Tang SP, Chen TM, Wong MW, Wong EM. The clinical presentation and outcome of treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants-a study of 1,086 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35:1091–1096. PMID: 10917303.
Article
5. Do TT. Congenital muscular torticollis: current concepts and review of treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006; 18:26–29. PMID: 16470158.
6. Ling CM, Low YS. Sternomastoid tumor and muscular torticollis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972; 86:144–150. PMID: 5065412.
Article
7. Stevens P, Downey C, Boyd V, Cole P, Stal S, Edmond J, Hollier L. Deformational plagiocephaly associated with ocular torticollis: a clinical study and literature review. J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18:399–405. PMID: 17414292.
8. Suzuki S, Yamamuro T, Fujita A. The aetiological relationship between congenital torticollis and obstetrical paralysis. Int Orthop. 1984; 8:175–181. PMID: 6530313.
Article
9. Cho KH, Kim JY, Lee IY, Yim SY. Congenital muscular torticollis in siblings: a case report and literature review. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2009; 33:731–734.
10. Sonmez K, Turkyilmaz Z, Demirogullari B, Ozen IO, Karabulut R, Bagbanci B, Basaklar AC, Kale N. Congenital muscular torticollis in children. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2005; 67:344–347. PMID: 16327275.
11. Davids JR, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. Congenital muscular torticollis: sequela of intrauterine or perinatal compartment syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993; 13:141–147. PMID: 8459000.
12. Thompson F, McManus S, Colville J. Familial congenital muscular torticollis: case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 202:193–196. PMID: 3955948.
13. Cheng JC, Tang SP, Chen TM. Sternocleidomastoid pseudotumor and congenital muscular torticollis in infants: a prospective study of 510 cases. J Pediatr. 1999; 134:712–716. PMID: 10356139.
Article
14. Brans J, Aramideh M, Bosch A, Speelman H. Late presentation of congenital muscular torticollis: a non-dystonic cause of torticollis. J Neurol. 1996; 243:354–356. PMID: 8965110.
Article
15. Singer C, Green BA, Bruce JH, Bowen BC, Weiner WJ. Late presentation of congenital muscular torticollis: use of MR imaging and CT scan in diagnosis. Mov Disord. 1994; 9:100–103. PMID: 8139587.
Article
16. Collins A, Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin injection for congenital muscular torticollis presenting in children and adults. Neurology. 2006; 67:1083–1085. PMID: 17000985.
Article
17. Oleszek JL, Chang N, Apkon SD, Wilson PE. Botulinum toxin type a in the treatment of children with con genital muscular torticollis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 84:813–816. PMID: 16205437.
18. Joyce MB, de Chalain TM. Treatment of recalcitrant idiopathic muscular torticollis in infants with botulinum toxin type a. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16:321–327. PMID: 15750434.
Article
19. Lim D, Kwon W, Cha SW, Yoo H, Lim S, Park JM, Kim MS. The sonographic correlation between the sternocleidomastoid muscle thickness and the prognosis of congenital muscular torticollis. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2009; 60:133–138.
Article
20. Cheng JC, Metreweli C, Chen TM, Tang S. Correlation of ultrasonographic imaging of congenital muscular torticollis with clinical assessment in infants. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2000; 26:1237–1241. PMID: 11120359.
Article
21. Tang SF, Hsu KH, Wong AM, Hsu CC, Chang CH. Longitudinal followup study of ultrasonography in congenital muscular torticollis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 403:179–185. PMID: 12360024.
Article
22. Cheng JC, Wong MW, Tang SP, Chen TM, Shum SL, Wong EM. Clinical determinants of the outcome of manual stretching in the treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants. A prospective study of eight hundred and twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A:679–687. PMID: 11379737.
23. Hsu TC, Wang CL, Wong MK, Hsu KH, Tang FT, Chen HT. Correlation of clinical and ultrasonographic features in congenital muscular torticollis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80:637–641. PMID: 10378488.
Article
24. Tatli B, Aydinli N, Caliskan M, Ozmen M, Bilir F, Acar G. Congenital muscular torticollis: evaluation and classification. Pediatr Neurol. 2006; 34:41–44. PMID: 16376277.
25. Celayir AC. Congenital muscular torticollis: early and intensive treatment is critical. A prospective study. Pediatr Int. 2000; 42:504–507. PMID: 11059539.
Article
26. Wolfort FG, Kanter MA, Miller LB. Torticollis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84:682–692. PMID: 2675152.
Article
27. Wei JL, Schwartz KM, Weaver AL, Orvidas LJ. Pseudotumor of infancy and congenital muscular torticollis: 170 cases. Laryngoscope. 2001; 111:688–695. PMID: 11359141.
Article
28. Cheng JC, Tang SP. Outcome of surgical treatment of congenital muscular torticollis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; 362:190–200. PMID: 10335298.
Article
29. Yu CC, Wong FH, Lo LJ, Chen YR. Craniofacial deformity in patients with uncorrected congenital muscular torticollis: an assessment from three-dimensional computed tomography imaging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113:24–33. PMID: 14707619.
Article
30. Dudkiewicz I, Ganel A, Blankstein A. Congenital muscular torticollis in infants: ultrasound-assisted diagnosis and evaluation. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005; 25:812–814. PMID: 16294141.
Article
31. Lin JN, Chou ML. Ultrasonographic study of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in the management of congenital muscular torticollis. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32:1648–1651. PMID: 9396548.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr