Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Feb;38(1):57-63. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.1.57.

The Quantitative Relationship Between Physical Examinations and the Nerve Conduction of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Patients With and Without a Diabetic Polyneuropathy

• Jeong DH
• Kim CH

• KMID: 2266541
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5535/arm.2014.38.1.57

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To understand the quantitative correlation between the clinical severity and physical examinations along with the electrodiagnostic findings by subjects with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and also the influence of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) on physical examinations by subjects with CTS.
METHODS
Among 200 patients suffering from hand tingling sensations, 68 patients were diagnosed with CTS on at least one hand by nerve conduction tests. Therefore, the Phalen test (PT), hand elevation test (HET), Tinel sign (TS) results were recorded on both hands. The physical examination grades were compared with the electrophysiological CTS grades in 126 hands of 68 patients. Also the comorbidity effect of DPN to CTS was evaluated. For the evaluation of the severity correlations between CTS, PT, HET, and TS, the Spearman analysis was used. An attempt was started to create a formula which could depict the electrophysiological severity of CTS.
RESULTS
Out of the 68 tested subjects, 31 were diagnosed with both DPN and CTS, and 37 with CTS only. Both PT and HET correlated well with the severity of CTS where the correlation of PT was higher than that of HET. The formula were the motor distal latency (MDL)=(72.4-PT)/5.3 and MDL=(76-HET)/7.2. Both PT and HET showed in the presence of DPN a relatively higher relation with CTS without significance.
CONCLUSION
PT and HET would be useful screening tools for the diagnosis and treatment of CTS as the grade of PT and HET present the severity of CTS well. During this study, a formula was created expecting the severity of nerve conduction study with PT and HET through the time domain value of physical examinations.

Keyword

Carpal tunnel syndrome; Diabetic polyneuropathy; Physical examination; Electrodiagnosis

MeSH Terms

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome*
Comorbidity
Diabetic Neuropathies*
Diagnosis
Electrodiagnosis
Hand
Humans
Mass Screening
Neural Conduction*
Physical Examination*
Sensation

Reference

1. Heller L, Ring H, Costeff H, Solzi P. Evaluation of Tinel's and Phalen's signs in diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Neurol. 1986; 25:40–42. PMID: 3940864.

2. Bracker MD, Ralph LP. The numb arm and hand. Am Fam Physician. 1995; 51:103–116. PMID: 7810463.

3. Sato Y, Honda Y, Iwamoto J, Kanoko T, Satoh K. Amelioration by mecobalamin of subclinical carpal tunnel syndrome involving unaffected limbs in stroke patients. J Neurol Sci. 2005; 231:13–18. PMID: 15792815.

4. Lo SF, Chou LW, Meng NH, Chen FF, Juan TT, Ho WC, et al. Clinical characteristics and electrodiagnostic features in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, double crush syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy. Rheumatol Int. 2012; 32:1257–1263. PMID: 21259009.

5. Morgan G, Wilbourn AJ. Cervical radiculopathy and coexisting distal entrapment neuropathies: double-crush syndromes? Neurology. 1998; 50:78–83. PMID: 9443461.

6. Ahn DS. Hand elevation: a new test for carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann Plast Surg. 2001; 46:120–124. PMID: 11216604.

7. Gellman H, Gelberman RH, Tan AM, Botte MJ. Carpal tunnel syndrome: an evaluation of the provocative diagnostic tests. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68:735–737. PMID: 3722231.

8. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive diabetes therapy on the development and progression of neuropathy. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122:561–568. PMID: 7887548.

9. Han EY, Kim CH. Reproducibility of nerve conduction study parameters: a comparison of normal and diabetic patients with neuropathy. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2007; 31:699–704.

10. Imaoka H, Yorifuji S, Takahashi M, Nakamura Y, Kitaguchi M, Tarui S. Improved inching method for the diagnosis and prognosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 1992; 15:318–324. PMID: 1557079.

11. Bland JD. A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2000; 23:1280–1283. PMID: 10918269.

12. Felsenthal G. Median and ulnar distal motor and sensory latencies in the same normal subject. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977; 58:297–302. PMID: 880004.

13. Kwon HK, Kim L, Park YK, Lee HJ. Frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome according to the severity of diabetic neuropathy. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2005; 29:272–275.

14. Brüske J, Bednarski M, Grzelec H, Zyluk A. The usefulness of the Phalen test and the Hoffmann-Tinel sign in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg. 2002; 68:141–145. PMID: 12050999.

15. Mondelli M, Passero S, Giannini F. Provocative tests in different stages of carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001; 103:178–183. PMID: 11532560.

16. Felsenthal G, Spindler H. Palmar conduction time of median and ulnar nerves of normal subjects and patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med. 1979; 58:131–138. PMID: 453339.