Korean J Lab Med.  2006 Jun;26(3):174-178. 10.3343/kjlm.2006.26.3.174.

Comparison of In-house Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay with Conventional Techniques for the Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

• Yang HY
• Lee HJ
• Park SY
• Lee KK
• Suh JT

• KMID: 2238883
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3343/kjlm.2006.26.3.174

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, introduced as a fast and sensitive diagnostic method, has been known to be useful in detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Therefore the purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of an in-house PCR assay in the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by comparing PCR results with those of conventional diagnostic techniques.
METHODS
We assessed the diagnostic yield of the in-house PCR assay retrospectively based on the patient's medical records using data from previously evaluated specimens submitted for PCR amplification IS6110 sequences by GeneAmp PCR system 9600 (Perkin Elmer, CT, USA). All samples had been examined for detection of M. tuberculosis by acid-fast stain and culture assay and the results from the 3 methods were analyzed.
RESULTS
The majority of cases (1,727 cases, 96.6%) showed concordant results between in-house PCR, AFB stain, and culture methods; only 60 cases (3.4%) displayed discordant results. The sensitivities, specificities and positive and negative predictive values of each method were as follows: 81.0%, 99.6%, 95.0% and 98.4%, respectively for the in-house PCR; 63.4%, 100%, 100% and 96.9%, respectively for AFB staining method; and 83.8%, 100%, 100% and 98.6%, respectively for culture assays.
CONCLUSIONS
The PCR assay shows a high sensitivity and specificity and is a reliable test for an early diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Keyword

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; In-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay; Acid-fast stain

MeSH Terms

Early Diagnosis
Medical Records
Mycobacterium tuberculosis*
Mycobacterium*
Polymerase Chain Reaction*
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tuberculosis

Reference

References

1. Yeam YS, Jeong OY, Jang SJ, Moon DS, Park YJ. Comparison of culture, Acid-Fast stain and polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Korean J Clin Pathol. 1995; 15:594–603.

2. Kivihya-Ndugga L, van Cleeff M, Juma E, Kimwomi J, Githui W, Oskam L, et al. Comparison of PCR with the routine procedure for diagnosis of Tuberculosis in a population with High prevalences of Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency virus. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42:1012–5.

3. Almeda J, Garcia A, Gonzalez J, Quinto L, Ventura PJ, Vidal R, et al. Clinical evaluation of an in-house IS6110 polymerase chain reaction for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000; 19:859–67.

4. American Thoracic Society. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000; 161:1376–95.

5. Kim JH, Jang SJ, Moon DS, Park YJ. Evaluation of two PCR-hybridization methods for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Korean J Lab Med. 2003; 23:32–8.

6. Lee KE, Cho JH, Moon YH. Comparison of stain methods with PCR and culture for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the sputum. Korean J Clin Pathol. 1998; 18:201–7.

7. Shin WS. Diagnosis of tuberculosis; Serodiagnosis and Molecular biologic Approach. Tbc and Resp Dis. 1992; 39:1–6.

8. Eing BR, Becker A, Sohns A, Ringelmann R. Comparison of Roche Cobas Amplicor Mycobacterium tuberculosis Assay with In-house PCR and Culture for detection of M. tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36:2023–9.

9. Betty AF, Daniel FS, editors. Bailey and Scott's Diagnostic Microbiology. 7th ed.St. Louis: Mosby;2002. p. 552.

10. Bogard M, Vincelette J, Antinozzi R, Alonso R, Fenner T, Schirm J, et al. Multicenter study of a commercial, automated polymerase chain reaction system for the rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Respiratory Specimens in Routine Clinical Practice. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001; 20:724–31.

11. Schirm J, Oostendorp LA, Mulder JG. Comparison of Amplicor, In-house PCR, and Conventional Culture for Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Clinical Samples. J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33:3221–4.

12. Cohen RA, Muzaffar S, Schwartz D, Bashir S, Luke S, Mcgartland LP, et al. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis Using PCR assays on sputum collected within 24 hours of hospital admission. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998; 157:156–61.

13. Beige J, Lokies J, Schaberg T, Finckh U, Fischer M, Mauch H, et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33:90–5.

14. Beavis KG, Lichty MB, Jungkind DL, Giger O. Evaluation of Amplicor PCR for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1995; 33:2582–6.