Korean J Fam Med.  2013 Sep;34(5):357-363. 10.4082/kjfm.2013.34.5.357.

Satisfaction and Difficulties of Korean Family Medicine Resident Training Faculty

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
  • 3Department of Family Medicine, Eulji General Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Family Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 5Department of Family Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. thju1105@hanmail.net
  • 6Department of Family Medicine, Pyeongtaek International Hospital, Pyeongtaek, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Practitioners of family medicine are essential to primary care practices in Korea. Resident training staffs in Korean family medicine departments have a crucial role in producing well-trained family physicians. This study assesses the aspects of satisfaction and difficulties of Korean family medicine resident training staffs.
METHODS
We surveyed the resident training staffs of various Korean family medicine departments using an online survey tool. The survey used in this study was modified from previously used questionnaires. Respondents rated items using a five-point Likert scale and a 0-10 visual analogue scale.
RESULTS
The response rate was 43.9% (122/278). The mean satisfaction score with regard to current family medicine residency programs was 7.59 out of 10. Resident training staffs found the administrative aspects of their role to be the most difficult. There were considerable differences in the reported difficulties of resident training according to the differing characteristics of each staff member, including age, sex, type of hospital, number of staff members, role as chief, and duration of staff. Most respondents (91.9%) cited a need for faculty development programs.
CONCLUSION
Korean family medicine resident training staffs need faculty development programs for the improvement of resident training. For the strengthening of core competencies among resident training staffs, faculty development programs or courses should be designed and implemented in Korea.

Keyword

Faculty Development; Survey; Family Medicine Teacher; Faculty Developmental Program

MeSH Terms

Surveys and Questionnaires
Humans
Internship and Residency
Korea
Physicians, Family
Primary Health Care
Full Text Links
  • KJFM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr