Korean Circ J.  2007 Mar;37(3):97-102. 10.4070/kcj.2007.37.3.97.

Predictive Factors for Restenosis after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea. sjpark@amc.seoul.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite the dramatic reduction in restenosis conferred by drug-eluting stents (DES), restenosis remains a significant problem for real-world patients. Restenosis is a complex phenomenon, and a variety of stent-, drug-, patient- and lesion-related factors have been studied as the determinants of restenosis after DES implantation.
METHODS
AND RESULTS: The stent delivery system, the polymer and the drug are integral components of DES, and these are the device-specific factors that can affect restenosis. While the sirolimuseluting Cypher stent appears to provide better outcomes than the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus stent in high-risk patient groups with complex lesions, such differences between the two DES are not apparent in the low-risk groups. Diabetic patients are generally prone to restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention, but there are conflicting findings regarding the impact of diabetes mellitus on restenosis after DES implantation. The post-intervention final lumen area continues to be the most important determinant of restenosis after DES implantation, indicating that a greater stented area contributes to a decreased rate of restenosis even in the DES era. Non-uniform strut distribution and stent fracture also contribute to the development of restenosis after DES implantation. In addition, the risk of restenosis increases linearly according to lesion length, and a "full metal jacket" approach in small vessels is related to a high risk of DES failure.
CONCLUSION
Small vessel disease, diffuse disease and the type of DES are important predictors of restenosis after DES implantation. However, predicting restenosis remains difficult, and this indicates the need for further studies in order to ultimately identify those patients who are at high risk for DES failure.

Keyword

Stents; Risk factors; Coronary restenosis

MeSH Terms

Coronary Restenosis
Diabetes Mellitus
Drug-Eluting Stents*
Humans
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Polymers
Risk Factors
Stents
Taxus
Polymers

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Late lumen loss at follow-up for 1,062 lesions after bare-metal stents implantation.

  • Fig. 2 Frequency distribution of the late loss values for the Cypher and Taxus stents.

  • Fig. 3 The sensitivity and specificity curves identified the optimal cutoff values of the final minimum stent CSA (A) & stent length (B) that predicted angiographic restenosis after Cypher implantation. CSA: cross sectional area.

  • Fig. 4 Effects of lesion length on the restenosis rate in small coronary arteries (≤2.8 mm).


Reference

1. Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2002. 346:1773–1780.
2. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med. 2003. 349:1315–1323.
3. Colombo A, Drzewiecki J, Banning A, et al. Randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for coronary artery lesions. Circulation. 2003. 108:788–794.
4. Pache J, Dibra A, Mehilli J, Dirschinger J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Drug-eluting stents compared with thin-strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2005. 26:1262–1268.
5. Ardissino D, Cavallini C, Bramucci E, et al. Sirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004. 292:2727–2734.
6. Grines CL, Bonow RO, Casey DE Jr, et al. Prevention of premature discontinuation of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery stents: a science advisory from the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American College of Surgeons, and American Dental Association, with representation from the American College of Physicians. Circulation. 2007. 115:813–818.
7. Bourassa MG, Lesperance J, Eastwood C, et al. Clinical, physiologic, anatomic and procedural factors predictive of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991. 18:368–376.
8. van Belle E, Bauters C, Hubert E, et al. Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels. Circulation. 1997. 96:1454–1460.
9. Peters RJ, Kok WE, di Mario C, et al. Prediction of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty: results of PICTURE (Post-intraCoronary Treatment Ultrasound Result Evaluation), a prospective multicenter intracoronary ultrasound imaging study. Circulation. 1997. 95:2254–2261.
10. Hirschfeld JW Jr, Schwartz JS, Jugo R, et al. Restenosis after coronary angioplasty: a multivariate statistical model to relate lesion and procedure variables to restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991. 18:647–656.
11. Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al. Arterial remodeling after coronary angioplasty: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996. 94:35–43.
12. Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1994. 331:496–501.
13. Carrozza JP Jr, Kuntz RE, Levine MJ, et al. Angiographic and clinical outcome of intracoronary stenting: immediate and long-term results from a large single-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992. 20:328–337.
14. Kastrati A, Schomig A, Elezi S, et al. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997. 30:1428–1436.
15. Elezi S, Kastrati A, Neumann FJ, Hadamitzky M, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Vessel size and long-term outcome after coronary stent placement. Circulation. 1998. 98:1875–1880.
16. Ho KKL, Senerchia C, Rodriguez O, et al. Predictors of angiographic restenosis after stenting: pooled analysis of 1197 patient with protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up from 5 randomized stent trials. Circulation. 1998. 98:Suppl I. I362.
17. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis in lesions treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998. 31:43–49.
18. Pache J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, et al. Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: strut thickness effect on restenosis outcome (ISAR-STEREO-2) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. 41:1283–1288.
19. Kuntz RE, Gibson CM, Nobuyoshi M, Baim DS. Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993. 21:15–25.
20. Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis: a serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 1996. 94:1247–1254.
21. Wessely R, Schomig A, Kastrati A. Sirolimus and Paclitaxel on polymer-based drug-eluting stents: similar but different. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 47:708–714.
22. Morice MC, Colombo A, Meier B, et al. Sirolimus- vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo coronary artery lesions: the REALITY trial: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006. 295:895–904.
23. Park MA, Ryu JN, Lim TH, et al. Comparisons of the short-term angiographic outcomes of cypher and taxus stents implanted in the same patient. Korean Circ J. 2006. 36:600–604.
24. Dibra A, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, et al. Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med. 2005. 353:663–670.
25. Kim YH, Park SW, Lee SW, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stent versus paclitaxel-eluting stent for patients with long coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2006. 114:2148–2153.
26. Kandzari DE, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with native coronary artery disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006. 48:2440–2447.
27. Kastrati A, Dibra A, Eberle S, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA. 2005. 294:819–825.
28. Schomig A, Kastrati A, Elezi S, et al. Bimodal distribution of angiographic measures of restenosis six months after coronary stent placement. Circulation. 1997. 96:3880–3887.
29. Kastrati A, Schomig A, Elezi S, Schuhlen H, Wilhelm M, Dirschinger J. Interlesion dependence of the risk for restenosis in patients with coronary stent placement in multiple lesions. Circulation. 1998. 97:2396–2401.
30. Lemos PA, Mercado N, van Domburg RT, Kuntz RE, O'Neill WW, Serruys PW. Comparison of late luminal loss response pattern after sirolimus-eluting stent iImplantation or conventional stenting. Circulation. 2004. 110:3199–3205.
31. Lee CW, Park DW, Lee BK, et al. Predictors of restenosis after placement of drug-eluting stents in one or more coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2006. 97:506–511.
32. Kastrati A, Dibra A, Mehilli J, et al. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary implantation of sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Circulation. 2006. 113:2293–2300.
33. Finn AV, Palacios IF, Kastrati A, Gold HK. Drug-eluting stents for diabetes mellitus: a rush to judgment? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005. 45:479–483.
34. Hong MK, Mintz GS, Lee CW, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006. 27:1305–1310.
35. Takebayashi H, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, et al. Nonuniform strut distribution correlates with more neointimal hyperplasia after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2004. 110:3430–3434.
36. Sianos G, Hofma S, Ligthart JM, et al. Stent fracture and restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004. 61:111–116.
37. Yoon HJ, Kim KS, Park HS, et al. Clinical and angiographic factors affect on in-stent restenosis. Korean Circ J. 2003. 33:1084–1092.
38. Mauri L, O'Malley AJ, Cutlip DE, et al. Effects of stent length and lesion length on coronary restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2004. 93:1340–1346.
39. Whang YJ, Kim HS, Kim KM, et al. The efficacy of drug eluting stents on restenosis reduction in small coronary arteries. Korean Circ J. 2006. 36:450–457.
Full Text Links
  • KCJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr