J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2014 May;55(5):669-678. 10.3341/jkos.2014.55.5.669.

Clinical Characteristics and Patient's Satisfaction in Pseudophakic Negative Dysphotopsia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. eye129@paran.com
  • 2Laboratory of Corneal Regenerative Medicine and Ocular Immunology, Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Ophthalmology, Myongji Hospital, Kwandong University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • 4Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with pseudophakic negative dysphotopsia after cataract surgery and to analyze the risk factors of pseudophakic negative dysphotopsia as well as the postoperative effects on patient's satisfaction.
METHODS
This study included 1,020 eyes of 690 patients who underwent phacoemulsification and posterior chamber lens insertion between January 2010 and March 2012. Retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of negative dysphotopsia according to the site of clear corneal incision during cataract surgery and the type of implanted intraocular lens (IOL). The clinical outcome of Neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Nd:YAG) laser anterior capsulotomy in negative dysphotopsia patients was evaluated. Using a telephone survey, patients were asked to subjectively answer 18 questions regarding satisfaction after cataract surgery, the severity of visual symptoms and the effect of negative dysphotopsia in their daily life.
RESULTS
Negative dysphotopsia developed in patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery and successful implantation of IOL in the bag. The patients' vision was corrected up to 20/20 (0.00 log MAR) and HVF P60-4 showed no abnormality in their visual field. There were significantly more patients with the SN60WF IOL who reported negative dysphotopsia but no other factors associated with the prevalence of negative dysphotopsia. During the telephone survey, patients complained of difficulties in their daily life related to the negative dysphotopsia symptoms and reported decreased satisfaction after cataract surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
Although negative dysphotopsia can decrease the patient's satisfaction after cataract surgery, the genesis of negative dysphotopsia and an objective method to test for negative dysphotopsia is necessary. Therefore, a prospective large study should be conducted to evaluate the cause and treatment of negative dysphotopsia.

Keyword

Cataract surgery; Negative dysphotopsia; Patient's satisfaction; Pseudophakia

MeSH Terms

Cataract
Humans
Lenses, Intraocular
Phacoemulsification
Prevalence
Pseudophakia
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Telephone
Visual Fields

Figure

  • Figure 1. Negative dysphotopsia seen by patient in the temporal field. (A) Case 1 complained of a temporal dark shadow in her left eye 1 week after cataract surgery. (B) Case 7 complained of a semicircular shadow in her both eyes 1 month after cataract surgery.

  • Figure 2. Prevalence of negative dysphotopsia according to implanted intraocular lens. Prevalence of negative dysphotopsia was different among the groups (p = 0.039, Fisher's exact test). Subgroup analysis showed that the prevalence of negative dysphotopsia in the group 3 is statistically higher than that of group 1 (p = 0.025, Fisher's exact test). However, there is no statistically significant difference of prevalence of negative dysphotopsia between the group 2 and group 3, and between the group 1 and group 2 (p = 0.122, 0.268, respectively, Fisher's exact test). Group 1 : who have never complained of negative dysphotopsia (Toric IOL, HOYA YA-60BB, HOYA PC-60AD, or Tecnis ZA9003); Group 2: who were implanted with Akreos Adapt AO; Group 3: who were implanted with Acrylsof® SN60WF.


Reference

References

1. Holladay JT. Evaluating the intraocular lens optic. Surv Ophthalmol. 1986; 30:385–90.
Article
2. Holladay JT, Bishop JE, Lewis JW. Diagnosis and treatment of mysterious light streaks seen by patients following extracapsular cataract extraction. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1985; 11:21–3.
Article
3. Holladay JT, Lang A, Portney V. Analysis of edge glare phenomena in intraocular lens edge designs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:748–52.
Article
4. Davison JA. Positive and negative dysphotopsia in patients with acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1346–55.
Article
5. Schwiegerling J. Recent developments in pseudophakic dysphotopsia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006; 17:27–30.
Article
6. Farbowitz MA, Zabriskie NA, Crandall AS, et al. Visual complaints associated with the AcrySof acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1339–45.
Article
7. Gobbi PG, Fasce F, Bozza S, Brancato R. Optomechanical eye model with imaging capabilities for objective evaluation of intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:643–51.
Article
8. McDonnell PJ, Lee P, Spritzer K, et al. Associations of presbyopia with vision-targeted health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003; 121:1577–81.
Article
9. Smith SR, Daynes T, Hinckley M, et al. The effect of lens edge design versus anterior capsule overlap on posterior capsule opacification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:521–6.
Article
10. Tester R, Pace NL, Samore M, Olson RJ. Dysphotopsia in phakic and pseudophakic patients: incidence and relation to intraocular lens type. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:810–6.
Article
11. Wallin TR, Hinckley M, Nilson C, Olson RJ. A clinical comparison of single-piece and three-piece truncated hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136:614–9.
Article
12. Welch NR, Gregori N, Zabriskie N, Olson RJ. Satisfaction and dysphotopsia in the pseudophakic patient. Can J Ophthalmol. 2010; 45:140–3.
Article
13. Radford SW, Carlsson AM, Barrett GD. Comparison of pseudophakic dysphotopsia with Akreos Adapt and SN60-AT intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:88–93.
Article
14. Narváez J, Banning CS, Stulting RD. Negative dysphotopsia associated with implantation of the Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:846–7.
Article
15. Trattler WB, Whitsett JC, Simone PA. Negative dysphotopsia after intraocular lens implantation irrespective of design and material. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:841–5.
Article
16. Osher RH. Negative dysphotopsia: long-term study and possible explanation for transient symptoms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1699–707.
Article
17. Vámosi P, Csákány B, Németh J. Intraocular lens exchange in patients with negative dysphotopsia symptoms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:418–24.
Article
18. Masket S, Fram NR. Pseudophakic negative dysphotopsia: Surgical management and new theory of etiology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1199–207.
Article
19. Gosala S. Optical phenomena causing negative dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:1620. author reply 1620-1.
Article
20. Izak AM, Werner L, Pandey SK, et al. Single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens explanted within the capsular bag: case report with clinicopathological correlation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1356–61.
21. Cooke DL, Kasko S, Platt LO. Resolution of negative dysphotopsia after laser anterior capsulotomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1107–9.
Article
22. Folden DV. Neodymium: YAG laser anterior capsulectomy: surgical option in the management of negative dysphotopsia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1110–5.
23. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, et al. The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsular opacification 3 years after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:49–54.
24. Davison JA. Clinical performance of Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:1112–23.
Article
25. Peng Q, Visessook N, Apple DJ, et al. Surgical prevention of posterior capsule opacification. Part 3: Intraocular lens optic barrier effect as a second line of defense. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:198–213.
26. Holladay JT, Zhao H, Reisin CR. Negative dysphotopsia: the enigmatic penumbra. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:1251–65.
Article
27. Birchall W, Brahma AK. Eccentric capsulorhexis and postoperative dysphotopsia following phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1378–81.
Article
28. Hwang IP, Olson RJ. Patient satisfaction after uneventful cataract surgery with implantationof a silicone or acrylic foldable intraocular lens. Comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1607–1610.
29. Kinard K, Jarstad A, Olson RJ. Correlation of visual quality with satisfaction and function in a normal cohort of pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:590–7.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr