J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2013 May;54(5):704-708. 10.3341/jkos.2013.54.5.704.

Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients Five Years or Younger

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jooyounoh77@gmail.com
  • 2Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate the clinical outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty.
METHODS
Records of patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty at the age of 5 years or younger were retrospectively reviewed. The survival rates of corneal grafts, postoperative complications, and causes of graft failure were evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 31 penetrating keratoplasties were performed in 29 patients, two of which were bilateral. The mean follow-up period was 78.72 +/- 8.94 months. The overall graft survival rate was 51.61%. The graft survival rate was 77.4% at 6 months, 61.3% at 12 months, 57.5% at 2 years, and 49.5% at 5 years after the surgery (the median survival time, 39.2 months). The main surgical indications included sclerocornea (35.5%), followed by Peter's anomaly (25.8%) and congenital glaucoma (9.7%). There were significant differences in graft survival time among the surgical indications, of which sclerocornea was the worst (p = 0.003). The main cause of graft failure was rejection (46.7%), followed by infection (26.7%) and primary endothelial decompensation (20%). When patients were sub-grouped according to age (under 12 months, between 12 to 48 months, and over 48 months), there was significant difference in graft survival time (p = 0.037) but not in overall graft survival rate (p = 0.154). Graft rejection occurred more frequently in patients between 12 to 48 months of age compared to other age groups (p = 0.016). Three out of 13 graft infections occurred in patients under 12 months of age.
CONCLUSIONS
The type of disease causing corneal opacity was a significant factor affecting the clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in children.

Keyword

Graft survival time; Penetrating keratoplasty

MeSH Terms

Child
Cornea
Corneal Diseases
Corneal Opacity
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Humans
Keratoplasty, Penetrating
Postoperative Complications
Rejection (Psychology)
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Transplants
Cornea
Corneal Diseases

Figure

  • Figure 1. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of corneal grafts. The overall graft survival rate was 51.6%. The graft survival was 77.4% at 6 months, 61.3% at 12 months, 57.5% at 2 years and 49.5% at 5 years after the surgery.

  • Figure 2. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of corneal grafts according to the surgical indications. Corneal mass, CHED and Peter’s anomaly show favorable outcome whereas scle-rocornea, congenital glaucoma, acquired corneal opacities and aniridia showed poor outcome. The differences of median sur-vival time among the surgical indications reached statistical significance ( p = 0.003, Log-Rank test).

  • Figure 3. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of corneal grafts according to the age groups. The mean survival time of cor-neal grafts according to the age groups was significantly dif-ferent; 72.26 ± 17.62 months in age under 12 months vs 54.03 ± 20.57 months in age 12 to 48 months vs 144.03 ±14.60 months in age over 48 months ( p = 0.037, Log-Rank test).

  • Figure 4. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve of corneal grafts according to the use of topical intraocular pressure (IOP) low-ering agents. The median survival time was not significantly different between the patients who used IOP lowering agents due to increased IOP after the surgery and those who did not ( p = 0.810, Log-Rank test).


Reference

References

1. Bermejo E, Martinez-Frias ML. Congenital eye malformations: clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in Spain. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 75:497–504.
Article
2. Ganekal S, Gangangouda C, Dorairaj S, Jhanji V. Early outcomes of primary pediatric keratoplasty in patients with acquired, atrau-matic corneal pathology. J AAPOS. 2011; 15:353–5.
Article
3. Vanathi M, Panda A, Vengayil S, et al. Pediatric keratoplasty. Surv Ophthalmol. 2009; 54:245–71.
Article
4. Al-Ghamdi A, Al-Rajhi A, Wagoner MD. Primary pediatric keratoplasty: indications, graft survival, and visual outcome. J AAPOS. 2007; 11:41–7.
Article
5. McClellan K, Lai T, Grigg J, Billson F. Penetrating keratoplasty in children: visual and graft outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:1212–4.
Article
6. Stulting RD, Sumers KD, Cavanagh HD, et al. Penetrating kerato-plasty in children. Ophthalmology. 1984; 91:1222–30.
Article
7. Lowe MT, Keane MC, Coster DJ, Williams KA. The outcome of corneal transplantation in infants, children, and adolescents. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:492–7.
Article
8. Dana MR, Schaumberg DA, Moyes AL, Gomes JA. Corneal trans-plantation in children with Peters anomaly and mesenchymal dysgenesis. Multicenter Pediatric Keratoplasty Study. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:1580–6.
9. Rao KV, Fernandes M, Gangopadhyay N, et al. Outcome of pene-trating keratoplasty for Peters anomaly. Cornea. 2008; 27:749–53.
Article
10. Yang LL, Lambert SR, Drews-Botsch C, Stulting RD. Long-term visual outcome of penetrating keratoplasty in infants and children with Peters anomaly. J AAPOS. 2009; 13:175–80.
Article
11. Yang LL, Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Long-term results of corneal graft survival in infants and children with peters anomaly. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:833–48.
Article
12. Huang C, O'Hara M, Mannis MJ. Primary pediatric keratoplasty: indications and outcomes. Cornea. 2009; 28:1003–8.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr