J Korean Surg Soc.  2000 Jan;58(1):58-66.

Prognostic Significance of Tumor Markers in Sera and Peritoneal Washings in Gastric Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of General Surgery, College of Medicine, Hanyang University.
  • 2Clinical Pathology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University.
  • 3Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite progress in surgical techniques and adjuvant treatments, the prognosis for advanced gastric cancer has not improved. Knowledge of the kinds of tumor markers that might indicate the postoperative prognosis for gastric cancer is important in detecting microscopic residual cancers but still needs to be developed.
METHODS
The serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (sCEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (sCA19-9), as well as the CEA, the CA19-9, and the tissue-type plasminogen activator levels in peritoneal washings (pCEA, pCA19-9, pTPA) were measured in 57 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone laparotomies from Oct. 1996 to Mar. 1997. The relationships between the positivity of tumor markers and several clinicopathological factors were evaluated by using a univariate analysis. Also, the significance of tumor markers in predicting the survival and the recurrence of disease was analyzed.
RESULTS
The positivity of pCEA and pCA19-9 increased according to the stage (p<0.01) and the presence of serosal invasion (P<0.01). When pCEA or pCA19-9 is positive, the rate of curative surgery in those patients was lower than it was in the patients with negative tumor markers (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). The positivities of pCEA, sCA19-9, pCA19-9 were higher in recurring cases than in nonrecurring cases after curative surgery (p<0.01, p<0.01, and p<0.05, respectively). The positivities of the tumor markers pCEA and pCA19-9 in the 4 cases with peritoneal seeding at the laparotomy were significantly different from those in the 53 cases with no peritoneal seeding (p<0.01) and (p<0.01), respectively pCEA. The risk of peritoneal recurrence after curative surgery was higher in pCEA positive cases than in negative cases (p=0.016) and in serosal positive and pCEA positive cases than in the other cases (p=0.016).
CONCLUSION
pCEA and pCA19-9 are useful prognostic factors and an adjuvant treatment to prevent peritoneal recurrence should be considered, especially, in patients presenting positive pCEA with positive serosal invasion.

Keyword

Gastric cancer; CEA and CA19-9 in serum; CEA, CA19-9, and TPA in peritoneal washings; Prognostic significance

MeSH Terms

Biomarkers, Tumor*
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Humans
Laparotomy
Neoplasm, Residual
Prognosis
Recurrence
Stomach Neoplasms*
Tissue Plasminogen Activator
Carcinoembryonic Antigen
Tissue Plasminogen Activator
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr