J Korean Med Assoc.  2012 Oct;55(10):969-977. 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.969.

Improving quality of healthcare in Korea

• Park HW

• KMID: 2192817
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.10.969

Abstract

Korea has achieved a remarkable expansion in health coverage at modest costs relative to other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries. Hospitals are more accessible and equipped with more advanced medical technologies than in most other OECD countries. OECD Reviews of Health Care Quality seek to support the development of better policies to improve the quality of healthcare. In 2012, a report on Korea presented best practices and offered recommendations for improvement in the Korean health system. Korea's health care system needs to shift its focus from simply supporting an ever-continuing expansion of acute care services to quality of healthcare. First, Korea needs to strengthen the focus of governance to the quality of healthcare by establishing HIRA as an institutional champion for quality. Second, Korea must strengthen primary healthcare because in Korea it is woefully underdeveloped today. Third, Korea must use financing to drive improvements in quality of care. In reality, HIRA has used its power over healthcare providers to force them to accept financial constraints; it has not supported quality of all healthcare sectors. Without structural changes allowing for independent judgment on the quality at HIRA, NECA is more suitable for ensuring quality for all healthcare sectors. As suggested by the OECD report, Korea must strengthen primary healthcare by restoring patients' trust in health professionals. In using financing to drive improvements in quality of healthcare, Pay for Performance may be helpful, but that must be driven on a voluntary basis and with a great financial incentive.

Keyword

Primary health care; Incentive reimbursement; Quality of health care

MeSH Terms

Adenosine-5'-(N-ethylcarboxamide)
Delivery of Health Care
Health Care Sector
Health Occupations
Health Personnel
Humans
Judgment
Korea
Motivation
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Primary Health Care
Quality of Health Care
Reimbursement, Incentive
Adenosine-5'-(N-ethylcarboxamide)

Reference

1. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health care quality review: Korea. Assessment and recommendations [Internet]. 2012. cited 2012 Sep 25. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development;Available from: http://www.oecd.org/korea/49818570.pdf.

2. World Health Organization. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems [Internet]. 2006. cited 2012 Sep 25. Geneva: World Health Organization;Available from: http://www.who.int/management/quality/assurance/QualityCare_B.Def.pdf.

3. Raleigh V, Foot C. Getting the measure of quality: opportunities and challenges [Internet]. 2010. cited 2012 Sep 25. London: The King's Fund;Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/files/kf/Getting-the-measure-of-quality-Veena-Raleigh-Catherine-Foot-The-Kings-Fund-January-2010.pdf.

4. Stevanovic V, Fujisawa R. Performance of systems of cancer care in OECD countries: exploration of the relation between resources, process quality, governance and survival in patients with breast, cervical, colorectal and lung cancers [Internet]. cited 2012 Sep 25. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development;Available from: http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/48098832.pdf.

5. Fricker J. How are we doing: the question that could help drive up standards across Europe's cancer services. Cancer World. 2012. (March/April):58–62.

6. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicators [Internet]. 2011. cited 2012 Sep 25. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development;Available from: http://www.oecd.org/health/healthpoliciesanddata/49105858.pdf.

7. National Health Insurance Act, No. 11141, Article 41-3. 2011. 12. 31.

8. Supreme Court Full Panel Decision 2010, Du27639, 27646. 2012. 06. 18.

9. Choi SW. Health insurance benefits have failed to reflect quality in health care. Doctors News. 2012. 07. 25.

10. Health and Medical Service Technology Promotion Act, No. 10996, Article 21. 2011. 04. 04.

11. Dixon A, Khachatryan A, Wallace A, Peckham S, Boyce T, Gillam S. Impact of Quality and Outcomes Framework on health inequalities [Internet]. 2011. cited 2012 Sep 25. London: The King's Fund;Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/impact-quality-and-outcomes-framework-health-inequalities.

12. Attorney-At-Law Act, No. 10922, Article 45-1. 2011. 07. 25.

13. Epstein AM. Pay for performance at the tipping point. N Engl J Med. 2007. 356:515–517.

14. Ryan A, Blustein J. Making the best of hospital pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2012. 366:1557–1559.

15. Werner RM, Kolstad JT, Stuart EA, Polsky D. The effect of pay-for-performance in hospitals: lessons for quality improvement. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011. 30:690–698.

16. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. About the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) [Internet]. cited 2012 Sep 25. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence;Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/qof/qof.jsp.

17. Borowitz M. Sustainability of health system: is P4P an alternative? Health Insur Rev Assess Serv. 2011. 5:21–26.

18. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS, editors. To err is human: building a safer health system. 1999. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

19. World Health Organization. Conceptual framework for the international classification for patient safety: final technical report [Internet]. 2009. cited 2012 Sep 25. Geneva: World Health Organization;Available from: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/taxonomy/icps_full_report.pdf.

20. Lee SI. Uneasy truths about patient safety: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency. Evid Value. 2012. 18:4–5.

21. Panesar SS, Cleary K, Sheikh A. Reflections on the National Patient Safety Agency's database of medical errors. J R Soc Med. 2009. 102:256–258.

22. National Patient Safety Agency. Report a patient safety incident [Internet]. cited 2012 Sep 22. London: National Patient Safety Agency;Available from: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/report-a-patient-safety-incident.

23. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 [Internet]. 2005. cited 2012 Sep 22. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality;Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/psoact.htm.

24. Act on Patient Safety in the Danish Health Care System [Internet]. 2003. cited 2012 Sep 22. Hvidovre: Dansk Selskab for Patientsikkerhed;Available from: http://patientsikkerhed.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/Patientsikkerhed/Loven/Act_on_Patient_Safety.pdf.

25. Constitution of the Republic of Korea, No. 10, Article 12-2. 1987. 09. 25.