Relationship between Positron Emission Tomography Uptake and Macroscopic Findings of Colorectal Cancer

Kim, So Young; Lee, Sun Young; Lim, Hwa Kyung; Lee, Ji Young; Hong, Sung Noh; Kim, Jeong Hwan; Sung, In Kyung; Park, Hyung Seok; Shim, Chan Sup; Jin, Choon Jo; Chung, Hyun Woo; So, Young

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
The semiquantitative parameter "standard uptake value" (SUV) of 18Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) provides important additional information about colorectal cancer. In general, colorectal cancers exhibit different growth patterns with different clinicopathological characteristics. The aim of this study was to elucidate the link between the macroscopic appearance of colorectal cancers and maximum SUV (SUVmax) FDG uptakes.
METHODS
We analyzed 347 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent PET scanning before treatment. The SUVmax of colorectal cancer was analyzed by examining PET images. The macroscopic appearance of each colorectal cancer was classified into three major types: ulcerofungating (n=223), ulceroinfiltrating (n=44), and fungating (n=78). Two cases that were difficult to classify were excluded from the study.
RESULTS
The SUVmax was higher in colorectal cancers with an ulcerofungating appearance (12.19+/-5.84, mean+/-standard deviation) and ulceroinfiltrating appearance (11.66+/-5.63) than in those with a fungating appearance (9.58+/-6.67; P=0.005) (ulcerofungating and ulceroinfiltrative vs. fungating, P<0.001). A smaller tumor size (P<0.001) were significantly related to the fungating colorectal cancer. Four out of six colorectal cancers that did not show FDG uptake were the fungating type.
CONCLUSIONS
Colorectal cancers with a fungating appearance exhibit a lower SUVmax, shallower invasion and smaller tumor size. Our results indicate that colorectal cancers with a fungating appearance would be less prominent on PET scan than those with an ulcerofungating or ulceroinfiltrating appearance, and thus require more attention.