Ann Rehabil Med.  2014 Aug;38(4):467-475. 10.5535/arm.2014.38.4.467.

Predictors of Recovery of Functional Swallow After Gastrostomy Tube Placement for Dysphagia in Stroke Patients After Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. awshaban@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • 3Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • 4Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Outcome and Effectiveness Research and Education (COERE), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • 5Center of Excellence in Comparative Effectiveness Research for Eliminating Disparities (CERED) Minority Health & Health Disparities Research Center (MHRC), University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • 6Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • 7Stroke Program, Department of Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To determine predictors of early recovery of functional swallow in patients who had gastrostomy (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG]) placement for dysphagia and were discharged to inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) after stroke.
METHODS
A retrospective study of prospectively identified patients with acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke from July 2008 to August 2012 was conducted. Patients who had PEG during stroke admission and were discharged to IPR, were studied. We compared demographics, stroke characteristics, severity of dysphagia, stroke admission events and medications in patients who remained PEG-dependent after IPR with those who recovered functional swallow.
RESULTS
Patients who remained PEG dependent were significantly older (73 vs. 54 years, p=0.009). Recovery of swallow was more frequent for hemorrhagic stroke patients (80% vs. 47%, p=0.079). Age, adjusting for side of stroke (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.98; p=0.016) and left-sided strokes, adjusting for age (OR, 15.15; 95% CI, 1.32-173.34; p=0.028) were significant predictors of swallow recovery. Patients who recovered swallowing by discharge from IPR were more likely to be discharged home compared to those who remained PEG-dependent (90% vs. 42%, p=0.009).
CONCLUSION
Younger age and left-sided stroke may be predictive factors of early recovery of functional swallow in patients who received PEG. Prospective validation is important as avoidance of unnecessary procedures could reduce morbidity and healthcare costs.

Keyword

Gastrostomy; Acute ischemic stroke; Rehabilitation; Dysphagia

MeSH Terms

Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders*
Demography
Gastrostomy*
Health Care Costs
Humans
Inpatients*
Pilot Projects*
Prospective Studies
Rehabilitation*
Retrospective Studies
Stroke*
Unnecessary Procedures

Reference

1. Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, England RE, Park CL, Wyatt R, Martin DF, et al. The natural history of dysphagia following a stroke. Dysphagia. 1997; 12:188–193. PMID: 9294937.
Article
2. Barer DH. The natural history and functional consequences of dysphagia after hemispheric stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989; 52:236–241. PMID: 2564884.
Article
3. Kumar S, Langmore S, Goddeau RP Jr, Alhazzani A, Selim M, Caplan LR, et al. Predictors of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with severe dysphagia from an acute-subacute hemispheric infarction. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012; 21:114–120. PMID: 20851628.
Article
4. Kumar S, Doughty C, Doros G, Selim M, Lahoti S, Gokhale S, et al. Recovery of swallowing after dysphagic stroke: an analysis of prognostic factors. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014; 23:56–62. PMID: 23102742.
Article
5. Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, Martin DF, England R. Aspiration following stroke: is it related to the side of the stroke? Clin Rehabil. 1997; 11:73–76. PMID: 9065363.
Article
6. Ickenstein GW, Kelly PJ, Furie KL, Ambrosi D, Rallis N, Goldstein R, et al. Predictors of feeding gastrostomy tube removal in stroke patients with dysphagia. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 12:169–174. PMID: 17903923.
Article
7. Geeganage C, Beavan J, Ellender S, Bath PM. Interventions for dysphagia and nutritional support in acute and subacute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 10:CD000323. PMID: 23076886.
Article
8. Gomes CA Jr, Lustosa SA, Matos D, Andriolo RB, Waisberg DR, Waisberg J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (11):CD008096. PMID: 21069702.
Article
9. James A, Kapur K, Hawthorne AB. Long-term outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in patients with dysphagic stroke. Age Ageing. 1998; 27:671–676. PMID: 10408659.
Article
10. Teasell R, Foley N, McRae M, Finestone H. Use of percutaneous gastrojejunostomy feeding tubes in the rehabilitation of stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82:1412–1415. PMID: 11588746.
Article
11. Savitskas RIu, Krishiunas AI. Dysphagia in patients with cerebral stroke during early inpatient rehabilitation. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2006; (Suppl 17):62–65. PMID: 18193580.
12. Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing: when and how? J Clin Epidemiol. 2001; 54:343–349. PMID: 11297884.
13. Martin RE, Sessle BJ. The role of the cerebral cortex in swallowing. Dysphagia. 1993; 8:195–202. PMID: 8359039.
Article
14. Gordon C, Hewer RL, Wade DT. Dysphagia in acute stroke. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987; 295:411–414.
Article
15. Hamdy S, Aziz Q, Rothwell JC, Singh KD, Barlow J, Hughes DG, et al. The cortical topography of human swallowing musculature in health and disease. Nat Med. 1996; 2:1217–1224. PMID: 8898748.
Article
16. Kern MK, Jaradeh S, Arndorfer RC, Shaker R. Cerebral cortical representation of reflexive and volitional swallowing in humans. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001; 280:G354–G360. PMID: 11171617.
Article
17. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing disorders following acute stroke: prevalence and diagnostic accuracy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000; 10:380–386. PMID: 10971024.
Article
18. Robbins J, Levine RL, Maser A, Rosenbek JC, Kempster GB. Swallowing after unilateral stroke of the cerebral cortex. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993; 74:1295–1300. PMID: 8259895.
Article
19. Gainotti G, Antonucci G, Marra C, Paolucci S. Relation between depression after stroke, antidepressant therapy, and functional recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 71:258–261. PMID: 11459907.
Article
20. Dam M, Tonin P, De Boni A, Pizzolato G, Casson S, Ermani M, et al. Effects of fluoxetine and maprotiline on functional recovery in poststroke hemiplegic patients undergoing rehabilitation therapy. Stroke. 1996; 27:1211–1214. PMID: 8685930.
Article
21. Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, Thalamas C, Berard E, Lamy C, et al. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011; 10:123–130. PMID: 21216670.
Article
22. Robol E, Fiaschi A, Manganotti P. Effects of citalopram on the excitability of the human motor cortex: a paired magnetic stimulation study. J Neurol Sci. 2004; 221:41–46. PMID: 15178212.
Article
23. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Intracerebral hemorrhage versus infarction: stroke severity, risk factors, and prognosis. Ann Neurol. 1995; 38:45–50. PMID: 7611724.
24. Andersen KK, Olsen TS, Dehlendorff C, Kammersgaard LP. Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared: stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors. Stroke. 2009; 40:2068–2072. PMID: 19359645.
25. Schroeder MF, Daniels SK, McClain M, Corey DM, Foundas AL. Clinical and cognitive predictors of swallowing recovery in stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006; 43:301–310. PMID: 17041816.
Article
26. Taylor TN, Davis PH, Torner JC, Holmes J, Meyer JW, Jacobson MF. Lifetime cost of stroke in the United States. Stroke. 1996; 27:1459–1466. PMID: 8784113.
Article
27. Rendall K, Pichard C, Louis SM, Reny JL. Enteral nutrition: nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy? Rev Med Suisse. 2012; 8:1972–1974. 1976–1977. PMID: 23198651.
28. Dennis MS, Lewis SC, Warlow C. FOOD Trial Collaboration. Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365:764–772. PMID: 15733717.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr