J Korean Med Sci.  2015 Jul;30(7):903-910. 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.7.903.

The Prognostic Value of the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Is Dependent upon the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Affiliations
  • 1Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators of Korean Circulation Society, Seoul, Korea. myungho@chollian.net
  • 2Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3The Heart Center of Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Gwangju, Korea.

Abstract

The prognostic value of the left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been questioned even though it is an accurate marker of left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction. This study aimed to examine the prognostic impact of LVEF in patients with AMI with or without high-grade mitral regurgitation (MR). A total of 15,097 patients with AMI who received echocardiography were registered in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) between January 2005 and July 2011. Patients with low-grade MR (grades 0-2) and high-grade MR (grades 3-4) were divided into the following two sub-groups according to LVEF: LVEF < or = 40% (n = 2,422 and 197, respectively) and LVEF > 40% (n = 12,252 and 226, respectively). The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, and all-cause death during the first year after registration. Independent predictors of mortality in the multivariate analysis in AMI patients with low-grade MR were age > or = 75 yr, Killip class > or = III, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide > 4,000 pg/mL, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein > or = 2.59 mg/L, LVEF < or = 40%, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, PCI was an independent predictor in AMI patients with high-grade MR. No differences in primary endpoints between AMI patients with high-grade MR (grades 3-4) and EF < or = 40% or EF > 40% were noted. MR is a predictor of a poor outcome regardless of ejection fraction. LVEF is an inadequate method to evaluate contractile function of the ischemic heart in the face of significant MR.

Keyword

Mitral Regurgitation; Acute Myocardial Infarction; Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

MeSH Terms

Aged
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease/mortality/*pathology/surgery
Echocardiography
Female
Heart/radiography
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Mitral Valve Insufficiency/*pathology
Myocardial Infarction/mortality/*pathology/surgery
Myocardium/pathology
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Prospective Studies
Stroke Volume/*physiology
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/*surgery
Ventricular Function, Left/physiology

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac event (MACE), and cardiac death in the mitral regurgitation grades 0-2 (upper panel) and grades 3-4 (lower panel) groups of acute myocardial infarction patients. Primary endpoints were significant in the groups with mild mitral regurgitation (MR) according to ejection fraction (EF) (≤ 40% and > 40%). However, the groups with severe MR did not exhibit significant differences in all-cause mortality based on EF (≤ 40% and > 40%).


Reference

1. Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001; 103:1759–1764.
2. Cho JY, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Jeong HC, Cho SC, Yoo JH, Song JE, Jang SY, Lee KH, Park KH, et al. Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Different impact of mitral regurgitation on clinical outcomes according to timing of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:4872–4874.
3. Lancellotti P, Lebrun F, Piérard LA. Determinants of exercise-induced changes in mitral regurgitation in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 42:1921–1928.
4. Yiu SF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tribouilloy C, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: A quantitative clinical study. Circulation. 2000; 102:1400–1406.
5. Perez de Isla L, Zamorano J, Quezada M, Almería C, Rodrigo JL, Serra V, García Rubira JC, Ortiz AF, Macaya C. Prognostic significance of functional mitral regurgitation after a first non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27:2655–2660.
6. Mollema SA, Nucifora G, Bax JJ. Prognostic value of echocardiography after acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2009; 95:1732–1745.
7. Magne J, Pibarot P. Left ventricular systolic function in ischemic mitral regurgitation: time to look beyond ejection fraction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26:1130–1134.
8. Hetzer R, Dandel M. Early detection of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with mitral regurgitation due to flail leaflet is still a challenge. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32:665–667.
9. White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987; 76:44–51.
10. Pecini R, Thune JJ, Torp-Pedersen C, Hassager C, Køber L. The relationship between mitral regurgitation and ejection fraction as predictors for the prognosis of patients with heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011; 13:1121–1125.
11. Amigoni M, Meris A, Thune JJ, Mangalat D, Skali H, Bourgoun M, Warnica JW, Barvik S, Arnold JM, Velazquez EJ, et al. Mitral regurgitation in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both: prognostic significance and relation to ventricular size and function. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28:326–333.
12. Cho JY, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Jeong HC, Jang SY, Kim SS, Rhew SH, Jeong YW, Lee KH, Park KH, et al. Impact of high admission blood pressure without history of hypertension on clinical outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction: From Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 172:e54–e58.
13. Lee KH, Jeong MH, Ahn Y, Cho MC, Kim CJ, Kim YJ. New horizons of acute myocardial infarction: from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28:173–180.
14. American College of Emergency Physicians. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the management of ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61:e78–e140.
15. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE Jr, Chavey WE 2nd, Fesmire FM, Hochman JS, Levin TN, et al. 2011 writing group members. ACCF/AHA task force members. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update Incorporated Into the ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011; 123:e426–e579.
16. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, et al. Chamber Quantification Writing Group. American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee. European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18:1440–1463.
17. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, et al. Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Standards, Subcommittee on Quantitation of Two-Dimensional Echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989; 2:358–367.
18. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS, American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002; 105:539–542.
19. Enriquez-Sarano M, Miller FA Jr, Hayes SN, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Effective mitral regurgitant orifice area: clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995; 25:703–709.
20. Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Schaff HV, Orszulak TA, McGoon MD, Bailey KR, Frye RL. Echocardiographic prediction of left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation: results and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 24:1536–1543.
21. Whitlow PL, Feldman T, Pedersen WR, Lim DS, Kipperman R, Smalling R, Bajwa T, Herrmann HC, Lasala J, Maddux JT, et al. EVEREST II Investigators. Acute and 12-month results with catheter-based mitral valve leaflet repair: the EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59:130–139.
22. Rumberger JA, Behrenbeck T, Breen JR, Reed JE, Gersh BJ. Nonparallel changes in global left ventricular chamber volume and muscle mass during the first year after transmural myocardial infarction in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993; 21:673–682.
23. Zito C, Cusmà-Piccione M, Oreto L, Tripepi S, Mohammed M, Di Bella G, Falanga G, Oreto G, Lentini S, Carerj S. In patients with post-infarction left ventricular dysfunction, how does impaired basal rotation affect chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26:1118–1129.
24. Gelsomino S, van Garsse L, Lucà F, Parise O, Cheriex E, Rao CM, Gensini GF, Maessen J. Left ventricular strain in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation in relation to mitral tethering pattern. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26:370–380.e11.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr