Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2016 Mar;59(2):79-84. 10.5468/ogs.2016.59.2.79.

Fetal heart rate monitoring: from Doppler to computerized analysis

• Kwon JY
• Park IY

• KMID: 2159000
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2016.59.2.79

Abstract

The monitoring of fetal heart rate (FHR) status is an important method to check well-being of the baby during labor. Since the electronic FHR monitoring was introduced 40 years ago, it has been expected to be an innovative screening test to detect fetuses who are becoming hypoxic and who may benefit from cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery. However, several randomized controlled trials have failed to prove that electronic FHR monitoring had any benefit of reducing the perinatal mortality and morbidity. Also it is now clear that the FHR monitoring had high intra- and interobserver disagreements and increased the rate of cesarean delivery. Despite such limitations, the FHR monitoring is still one of the most important obstetric procedures in clinical practice, and the cardiotocogram is the most-used equipment. To supplement cardiotocogram, new methods of computerized FHR analysis and electrocardiogram have been developed, and several clinical researches have been currently performed. Computerized equipment makes us to analyze beat-to-beat variability and short term heart rate patterns. Furthermore, researches about multiparameters of FHR variability will be ongoing.

Keyword

Cardiotocography; Electrocardiography; Fetal heart rate; Monitoring; Perinatal mortality

MeSH Terms

Cardiotocography
Electrocardiography
Female
Fetal Heart*
Fetus
Heart Rate
Heart Rate, Fetal*
Mass Screening
Perinatal Mortality
Pregnancy

Reference

1. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC. The paradox of electronic fetal monitoring: more data may not enable us to predict or prevent infant neurologic morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 168(3 Pt 1):745–751.

2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114:192–202.

3. Signore C, Freeman RK, Spong CY. Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113:687–701.

4. Alfirevic Z, Devane D, Gyte GM. Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 5:CD006066.

5. Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium. Confidential enquiry into stillbirths and deaths in infancy: 4th annual report. London: HMPO;1997.

6. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L. Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997; 57:33–37.

7. Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106:1307–1310.

8. Westerhuis ME, van Horen E, Kwee A, van der Tweel I, Visser GH, Moons KG. Inter- and intra-observer agreement of intrapartum ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in women monitored by STAN. BJOG. 2009; 116:545–551.

9. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003; 52:1–113.

10. Kamath MV, Fallen EL. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability: a noninvasive signature of cardiac autonomic function. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1993; 21:245–311.

11. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 1996; 17:354–381.

12. Liston R, Crane J, Hamilton E, Hughes O, Kuling S, MacKinnon C, et al. Fetal health surveillance in labour. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002; 24:250–276.

13. Hankins GD, Miller DA. A review of the 2008 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: recommendations for fetal heart rate terminology and interpretation. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 54:3–7.

14. Grimes DA, Peipert JF. Electronic fetal monitoring as a public health screening program: the arithmetic of failure. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116:1397–1400.

15. Larma JD, Silva AM, Holcroft CJ, Thompson RE, Donohue PK, Graham EM. Intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring and the identification of metabolic acidosis and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197:301.e1–301.e8.

16. Walsh CA, McMenamin MB, Foley ME, Daly SF, Robson MS, Geary MP. Trends in intrapartum fetal death, 1979-2003. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198:47.e1–47.e7.

17. Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn-Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How "common" are the common neurologic disorders? Neurology. 2007; 68:326–337.

18. Vintzileos AM, Nochimson DJ, Antsaklis A, Varvarigos I, Guzman ER, Knuppel RA. Comparison of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring versus intermittent auscultation in detecting fetal acidemia at birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173:1021–1024.

19. Goldaber KG, Gilstrap LC 3rd, Leveno KJ, Dax JS, Mc-Intire DD. Pathologic fetal acidemia. Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78:1103–1107.

20. Smith V, Begley CM, Clarke M, Devane D. Professionals' views of fetal monitoring during labour: a systematic review and thematic analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012; 12:166.

21. ACOG practice bulletin. Antepartum fetal surveillance. Number 9, October 1999 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 188, January 1994). Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000; 68:175–185.

22. ACOG technical bulletin. Induction of labor. Number 217, December 1995 (replaces no. 157, July 1991). American College of Obstetricians Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996; 53:65–72.

23. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Evidence-based clinical guideline: the use of electronic fetal monitoring. London: RCOG Press;2001.

24. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Intrapartum care: care for the healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence;2007.

25. Chung TK, Mohajer MP, Yang ZJ, Chang AM, Sahota DS. The prediction of fetal acidosis at birth by computerised analysis of intrapartum cardiotocography. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 102:454–460.

26. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. System 8000: computerized antenatal FHR analysis. J Perinat Med. 1991; 19(1-2):47–51.

27. East CE, Leader LR, Sheehan P, Henshall NE, Colditz PB, Lau R. Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 5:CD006174.

28. Rosen KG, Lindecrantz K. STAN: the Gothenburg model for fetal surveillance during labour by ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1989; 10:Suppl B. 51–56.

29. Neilson JP. Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 5:CD000116.

30. Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J. Intra- and interobserver variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987; 66:421–424.

31. Belfort MA, Saade GR, Thom E, Blackwell SC, Reddy UM, Thorp JM Jr, et al. A randomized trial of intrapartum fetal ECG ST-Segment analysis. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:632–641.

32. Aletti F, Ferrario M, Tam E, Cautero M, Cerutti S, Capelli C, et al. Identification of vascular responses to exercise and orthostatic stress in bed rest-induced cardiovascular deconditioning. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:5332–5335.

33. Oppenheimer LW, Lewinsky RM. Power spectral analysis of fetal heart rate. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 8:643–661.

34. Van Laar JO, Porath MM, Peters CH, Oei SG. Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability for fetal surveillance: review of the literature. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87:300–306.

35. Kwon JY, Park IY, Shin JC, Song J, Tafreshi R, Lim J. Specific change in spectral power of fetal heart rate variability related to fetal acidemia during labor: comparison between preterm and term fetuses. Early Hum Dev. 2012; 88:203–207.

36. Goncalves H, Rocha AP, Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J. Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006; 44:847–855.

37. Signorini MG, Ferrario M, Cerutti S, Magenes G. Advances in monitoring cardiovascular signals. Contribution of nonlinear signal processing. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011; 2011:6568–6571.

38. Ferrario M, Magenes G, Campanile M, Carbone IF, Di Lieto A, Signorini MG. Multiparameter analysis of heart rate variability signal for the investigation of high risk fetuses. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009; 2009:4662–4665.

39. Li X, Zheng D, Zhou S, Tang D, Wang C, Wu G. Approximate entropy of fetal heart rate variability as a predictor of fetal distress in women at term pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005; 84:837–843.

40. Lim J, Kwon JY, Song J, Choi H, Shin JC, Park IY. Quantitative comparison of entropy analysis of fetal heart rate variability related to the different stages of labor. Early Hum Dev. 2014; 90:81–85.