Clin Endosc.  2015 May;48(3):221-227. 10.5946/ce.2015.48.3.221.

The Efficacy of an Endoscopic Grasp-and-Traction Device for Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: An Ex Vivo Comparative Study (with Video)

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. d.scholvink@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • 3Division of Research and Development for Minimally Invasive Treatment, Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
To investigate whether the EndoLifter (Olympus), a counter-traction device facilitating submucosal dissection, can accelerate endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
METHODS
Two endoscopists (novice/expert in ESD) performed 64 ESDs (artificial 3-cm lesions) in 16 ex vivo pig stomachs: per stomach, two at the posterior wall (forward approach) and two at the lesser curvature (retroflex approach). Per approach, one lesion was dissected with (EL+) and one without (EL-) the EndoLifter. The submucosal dissection time (SDT), corrected for specimen size, and the influence of ESD experience on EndoLifter usefulness were assessed.
RESULTS
En bloc resection rate was 98.4%. In the forward approach, the median SDT was shorter with the EndoLifter (0.56 min/cm2 vs. 0.91 min/cm2), although not significantly (p=0.09). The ESD-experienced endoscopist benefitted more from the EndoLifter (0.45 [EL+] min/cm2 vs. 0.68 [EL-] min/cm2, p=0.07) than the ESD-inexperienced endoscopist (0.77 [EL+] min/cm2 vs. 1.01 [EL-] min/cm2, p=0.48). In the retroflex approach, the median SDTs were 1.06 (EL+) and 0.48 (EL-) min/cm2 (p=0.16). The EndoLifter did not shorten the SDT for the ESD-experienced endoscopist (0.68 [EL+] min/cm2 vs. 0.68 [EL-] min/cm2, p=0.78), whereas the ESD-inexperienced endoscopist seemed hindered (1.65 [EL+] min/cm2 vs. 0.38 [EL-] min/cm2, p=0.03).
CONCLUSIONS
In gastric ESD, the EndoLifter, in trend, shortens SDTs in the forward, but not in the retroflex approach. Given the low numbers in this study, a type II error cannot be excluded.

Keyword

Endoscopic submucosal dissection; EndoLifter; Stomach neoplasms; Gastric mucosa; Swine

MeSH Terms

Gastric Mucosa
Stomach
Stomach Neoplasms
Swine

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The EndoLifter (Olympus). (A) The EndoLifter mounted on the tip of an endoscope. (B) Grasping forceps proceeding forward over the tip of the endoscope and opening.

  • Fig. 2 Experimental set-up. (A) A training kit and the EndoLifter (Olympus). A porcine stomach with the esophagus in a training model, tied with sutures and a glass loop. (B) Per stomach, four artificial lesions (3 cm) are created: I and II at the lesser curvature (retroflex approach) and III and IV at the posterior wall (forward approach).

  • Fig. 3 Experimental set-up II. Flowchart of the study.


Reference

1. Pouw RE, Bergman JJ. Endoscopic resection of early oesophageal and gastric neoplasia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008; 22:929–943. PMID: 18790439.
Article
2. Ribeiro-Mourão F, Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions: results of an European inquiry. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:814–819. PMID: 20886399.
Article
3. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut. 2001; 48:225–229. PMID: 11156645.
Article
4. Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K, et al. Successful en-bloc resection of large superficial tumors in the stomach and colon using sodium hyaluronate and small-caliber-tip transparent hood. Endoscopy. 2003; 35:690–694. PMID: 12929067.
Article
5. Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early esophageal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 3(7 Suppl 1):S67–S70. PMID: 16013002.
Article
6. Yahagi N, Uraoka T, Ida Y, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection using the Flex and the Dual knives. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 13:74–78.
Article
7. Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S, et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy. 2010; 42:853–858. PMID: 20623442.
Article
8. Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Hon SF, Mak TW, Ng EK, Lau JY. Ex vivo comparative study using the Endolifter(R) as a traction device for enhancing submucosal visualization during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc. 2013; 27:1422–1427. PMID: 23093235.
9. Saito Y, Emura F, Matsuda T, et al. A new sinker-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005; 62:297–301. PMID: 16046999.
Article
10. Chen PJ, Chu HC, Chang WK, Hsieh TY, Chao YC. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with internal traction for early gastric cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 67:128–132. PMID: 18054010.
Article
11. Jeon WJ, You IY, Chae HB, Park SM, Youn SJ. A new technique for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: peroral traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:29–33. PMID: 19111686.
Article
12. Li CH, Chen PJ, Chu HC, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with the pulley method for early-stage gastric cancer (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73:163–167. PMID: 21030018.
Article
13. Gotoda T, Oda I, Tamakawa K, Ueda H, Kobayashi T, Kakizoe T. Prospective clinical trial of magnetic-anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for large early gastric cancer (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:10–15. PMID: 18599053.
Article
14. Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors by using a novel spring-action S-O clip for traction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 69:1370–1374. PMID: 19403131.
Article
15. Imaeda H, Iwao Y, Ogata H, et al. A new technique for endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer using an external grasping forceps. Endoscopy. 2006; 38:1007–1010. PMID: 16673308.
Article
16. Motohashi O, Nishimura K, Nakayama N, Takagi S, Yanagida N. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (two-point fixed ESD) for early esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2009; 21:176–179. PMID: 19691765.
Article
17. Yonezawa J, Kaise M, Sumiyama K, Goda K, Arakawa H, Tajiri H. A novel double-channel therapeutic endoscope ("R-scope") facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial gastric neoplasms. Endoscopy. 2006; 38:1011–1015. PMID: 17058166.
Article
18. Uraoka T, Kato J, Ishikawa S, et al. Thin endoscope-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 66:836–839. PMID: 17905031.
Article
19. Ahn JY, Choi KD, Choi JY, et al. Transnasal endoscope-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric adenoma and early gastric cancer in the pyloric area: a case series. Endoscopy. 2011; 43:233–235. PMID: 21165828.
Article
20. von Delius S, Karagianni A, von Weyhern CH, et al. Percutaneously assisted endoscopic surgery using a new PEG-minitrocar for advanced endoscopic submucosal dissection (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2008; 68:365–369. PMID: 18561928.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr