Korean J Anesthesiol.  2014 Nov;67(5):317-322. 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.5.317.

A comparison of i-gel(TM) and LMA Supreme(TM) in anesthetized and paralyzed children

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dong-A University Hospital, Busan, Korea. cjchung@dau.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Both the i-gel(TM) (i-gel) and LMA Supreme(TM) (Supreme) are new single-use second generation supraglottic airway devices available in pediatric sizes. This study was designed to investigate the i-gel in comparison with the Supreme in children undergoing general anesthesia.
METHODS
One hundred children with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II undergoing general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the i-gel or the Supreme group (50 children in each group). The device size was chosen according to weight of the children. We assessed the insertion success rate, insertion time, oropharyngeal leak pressure, grade of the fiberoptic glottic view, number of airway manipulations required, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS
There were no differences in the demographic data between the two groups. The success rate of insertion was same in both groups. The insertion time of the i-gel was longer than that of Supreme (P = 0.004). The oropharyngeal leak pressure in the i-gel group was higher than that in the Supreme group (P = 0.013). On fiberoptic examination, the vocal cords were visible in 90% of the children in the i-gel group and in 96% of the children in the Supreme group. The number of airway manipulations required was higher in the i-gel group (14 cases) than in the Supreme group (1 case) (P < 0.001). There were no differences in complications including blood staining of the device and sore throat between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Both the i-gel and Supreme provided a satisfactory airway during general anesthesia in children. Compared to the Supreme, the i-gel demonstrated a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure, longer time for insertion, and a greater number of airway manipulations during anesthesia.

Keyword

Laryngeal masks; Pediatrics

MeSH Terms

Anesthesia
Anesthesia, General
Blood Stains
Child*
Humans
Laryngeal Masks
Pediatrics
Pharyngitis
Postoperative Complications
Vocal Cords

Cited by  3 articles

Safety and clinical usefulness of supraglottic airway device
Geun Joo Choi, Hyun Kang
J Korean Med Assoc. 2015;58(10):905-914.    doi: 10.5124/jkma.2015.58.10.905.

A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants
Yoon Chan Lee, Kyoung Seop Yoon, Sang Yoong Park, So Ron Choi, Chan Jong Chung
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71(1):37-42.    doi: 10.4097/kjae.2018.71.1.37.

Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure of I-gelTM and BlockbusterTM laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized pediatric patients
Caren Candace Selvin, Geeta Singariya, Pooja Bihani, Manoj Kamal, Naveen Paliwal, Shobha Ujwal
Anesth Pain Med. 2023;18(1):51-56.    doi: 10.17085/apm.22209.

Full Text Links
  • KJAE
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr