Korean J Urol.  1988 Jun;29(3):381-386.

The Consideration about the Histology and Its Prognosis According to the Gleason Grade System of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Korea University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Prognosis of prostatic carcinoma can be cheefly influenced not by method of treatment, but histological differentiation and tumor stage. We reviewed histologic grade and survival of prostatic carcinoma retrospectively using the Gleason grade system based on gland differentiation and relation between gland and stroma in 25 patients from Jan, 1980 to Jan, 1987, Whom we had follow-up data about. The following results were obtained. 1. The average age of patients was 69 years with a range of 56 to 84 years. 2. We identified 1 patients as grade 2, 4 patients as grade 3, 9 patients as grade 4, 11 patients as grade 5 of total 25 patients. In 2 year survival, there were 100% for low combined Gleason(2-4), 90% for intermediate group(5-7), 80% for high grade. 3. There was close relationship between tumor grade and stage such that high grade is high stage, low grade is in low stage. 4. There were high mortality index(0.102) in high grade group, low mortality index(0.039 %) in low grade group in prostatic index combined Gleason grade with clinical tumor staging.

Keyword

prostatic cancer; Gleason score; prognosis

MeSH Terms

Adenocarcinoma*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Mortality
Neoplasm Grading
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis*
Prostatic Neoplasms
Retrospective Studies
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr