J Korean Soc Transplant.  2013 Dec;27(4):153-159. 10.4285/jkstn.2013.27.4.153.

Histopathological Features of Late Liver Allograft Dysfunction

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. d890075@gmail.com

Abstract

Interpretation of late allograft biopsies can be challenging because of overlapping clinicopathological features, regional difference of underlying liver diseases for liver transplantation, and continuous changing of preoperative treatment modalities of native liver diseases. In this review article, the potential causes and histopathological features of late allograft dysfunction are discussed. The causes include recurrence of native liver disease, late-onset acute rejection, chronic rejection, and posttransplant malignancy or hepatitis of unknown etiology. Differential diagnosis between recurrent or late-onset acute rejection and early-stage chronic rejection, either reversible or finally leading to late-stage chronic rejection, is practically difficult; however, clinically, it affects patient treatment. Diagnosis of recurrent hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus hepatitis should be made with consideration of both serological evaluation for deoxyribonucleic acid, ribo nucleic acid, or antibodies and histopathological features. Although differentiation of recurrent or de novo autoimmune hepatitis from acute rejection is difficult, patients with autoimmune hepatitis undergo similar treatment. In pediatric patients, evaluation of Epstein-Barr virus-associated changes, which vary from nonspecific hepatitis to post- transplant lymphoproliferative disorder with or without acute rejection, is practically important from the point of treatment. From our 16-year experience in Asan Medical Center, it has become clear that the histopathological diagnosis of late allograft biopsies must be made on the basis of consensus criteria for the common and problematic causes of late complications of liver transplantations proposed by the Banff Working Group, by integration of clinical features and results of key serological tests, and even by consideration of responses to previous treatment.

Keyword

Liver transplantation; Graft rejection; Hepatitis; Recurrence

MeSH Terms

Antibodies
Biopsy
Chungcheongnam-do
Consensus
Diagnosis
Diagnosis, Differential
DNA
Graft Rejection
Hepatitis
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis, Autoimmune
Humans
Liver Diseases
Liver Transplantation
Liver*
Lymphoproliferative Disorders
Recurrence
Serologic Tests
Transplantation, Homologous*
Viruses
Antibodies
DNA

Figure

  • Fig. 1. A representative case of severe late acute cellular rejection. (A) The liver allograft biopsy shows multifocal central perivenulitis and moderate portal inflammation (HE stain, ×12.5). (B) Portal inflammation and bile duct injury is mild (arrow), compared with central perivenulitis (HE stain, ×100). Abbreviations: P, portal tract; CV, central vein.

  • Fig. 2. A representative case of early chronic rejection. (A) The liver allograft biopsy shows minimal portal inflammation with sen-escence of bile duct epithelium (arrow) (HE stain, ×200) and (B) aggregation of foamy histiocytes obstructing the sinusoids (HE stain, ×400).

  • Fig. 3. A representative case of late chronic rejection. The liver allograft biopsy shows diffuse loss of interlobular bile ducts by CK7 immunostaining (A, x12.5) and advanced fibrosis by Masson’ s trichrome staining (B, ×12.5).

  • Fig. 4. A representative case of EBV infection in a pediatric liver transplantation patient. (A) The liver allograft biopsy shows diffuse sinusoidal lymphocytosis (HE stain, x200) and (B) mild lobular activity (HE stain, x200). Abbreviation: EBV, Epstein-Barr virus.

  • Fig. 5. A representative case of de novo autoimmune hepatitis in a pediatric liver transplantation patient. (A) The liver allogfraft biopsy shows moderate mononuclear cell infiltration in the portal tract (HE stain, x100) and (B) bile duct damage by CK7 immunostaining (×400).

  • Fig. 6. Summary of histopathological features of late liver allograft dysfunction and the most probable pathological diagnoses. Abbreviations: PBC, primary biliary cirrhosis; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis; PTLD, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.


Reference

1). Desai M, Neuberger J. Chronic liver allograft dysfunction. Transplant Proc. 2009; 41:773–6.
Article
2). European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR). Overall in-dication and results [Internet]. Villejuif: ELTR;2013. [cited 2013 Nov 10]. Available from. http://www.eltr.org.
3). Banff Working G, Demetris AJ, Adeyi O, Bellamy CO, Clouston A, Charlotte F, et al. Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction. Hepatology. 2006; 44:489–501.
Article
4). Hübscher SG. What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft? J Hepatol. 2011; 55:702–17.
Article
5). Anand AC, Hubscher SG, Gunson BK, McMaster P, Neuberger JM. Timing, significance, and prognosis of late acute liver allograft rejection. Transplantation. 1995; 60:1098–103.
Article
6). Hübscher SG. Central perivenulitis: a common and po-tentially important finding in late posttransplant liver biopsies. Liver Transpl. 2008; 14:596–600.
Article
7). Wiesner RH, Batts KP, Krom RA. Evolving concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of chronic hepatic allograft rejection. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999; 5:388–400.
Article
8). Demetris A, Adams D, Bellamy C, Blakolmer K, Clouston A, Dhillon AP, et al. Update of the International Banff Schema for Liver Allograft Rejection: working recom-mendations for the histopathologic staging and reporting of chronic rejection. An International Panel. Hepatology. 2000; 31:792–9.
9). O'Grady JG. Phenotypic expression of recurrent disease after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2010; 10:1149–54.
10). Burt AD, Portmann BC, et al. MacSween's pathology of the liver. 6th ed.Edingurgh: Churchill Livinstone;2012.
11). Campos-Varela I, Castells L, Buti M, Vargas V, Bilbao I, Rodríguez-Frías F, et al. Does pre-liver transplant HBV DNA level affect HBV recurrence or survival in liver transplant recipients receiving HBIg and nucleos(t)ide analogues? Ann Hepatol. 2011; 10:180–7.
Article
12). Petrovic LM. Recurrent diseases following liver transplantation: current concepts. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012; 17:293–302.
13). Rubín A, Aguilera V, Berenguer M. Liver transplantation and hepatitis C. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011; 35:805–12.
14). Samonakis DN, Germani G, Burroughs AK. Immuno-suppression and HCV recurrence after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2012; 56:973–83.
Article
15). Demetris AJ. Evolution of hepatitis C virus in liver allografts. Liver Transpl. 2009; 15(Suppl 2):S35–41.
Article
16). Narang TK, Ahrens W, Russo MW. Post-liver transplant cholestatic hepatitis C: a systematic review of clinical and pathological findings and application of consensus criteria. Liver Transpl. 2010; 16:1228–35.
Article
17). Berardi S, Lodato F, Gramenzi A, D'Errico A, Lenzi M, Bontadini A, et al. High incidence of allograft dysfunction in liver transplanted patients treated with pegy-lated-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for hepatitis C recurrence: possible de novo autoimmune hepatitis? Gut. 2007; 56:237–42.
Article
18). Merli M, Gentili F, Giusto M, Attili AF, Corradini SG, Mennini G, et al. Immune-mediated liver dysfunction after antiviral treatment in liver transplanted patients with hepatitis C: allo or autoimmune de novo hepatitis? Dig Liver Dis. 2009; 41:345–9.
Article
19). Khettry U, Huang WY, Simpson MA, Pomfret EA, Pomposelli JJ, Lewis WD, et al. Patterns of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation in a recent cohort of patients. Hum Pathol. 2007; 38:443–52.
Article
20). Demetris AJ, Eghtesad B, Marcos A, Ruppert K, Nalesnik MA, Randhawa P, et al. Recurrent hepatitis C in liver allografts: prospective assessment of diagnostic accuracy, identification of pitfalls, and observations about pathogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28:658–69.
21). Krieger NR, Martinez OM, Krams SM, Cox K, So S, Esquivel CO. Significance of detecting Epstein-Barr-spe-cific sequences in the peripheral blood of asymptomatic pediatric liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2000; 6:62–6.
Article
22). Kim SA, Song DE, Kim JH, Jang SJ, Jang JY, Kim KM, et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of explanted liver and allograft liver biopsy in pediatric patients. Korean J Pathol Suppl. 2008; 42:57.
23). Pfitzmann R, Schwenzer J, Rayes N, Seehofer D, Neu-haus R, Nussler NC. Long-term survival and predictors of relapse after orthotopic liver transplantation for alco-holic liver disease. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13:197–205.
Article
24). Kim WR, Poterucha JJ, Porayko MK, Dickson ER, Steers JL, Wiesner RH. Recurrence of nonalcoholic steatohepa-titis following liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1996; 62:1802–5.
25). Riva S, Sonzogni A, Bravi M, Bertani A, Alessio MG, Candusso M, et al. Late graft dysfunction and autoantibodies after liver transplantation in children: preliminary results of an Italian experience. Liver Transpl. 2006; 12:573–7.
Article
26). Cho JM, Kim KM, Oh SH, Lee YJ, Rhee KW, Yu E. De novo autoimmune hepatitis in Korean children after liver transplantation: a single institution's experience. Transplant Proc. 2011; 43:2394–6.
Article
27). Salcedo M, Vaquero J, Bañares R, Rodríguez-Mahou M, Alvarez E, Vicario JL, et al. Response to steroids in de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2002; 35:349–56.
Article
28). Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, Bianchi L, Burroughs AK, Cancado EL, et al. International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol. 1999; 31:929–38.
Article
29). Mieli-Vergani G, Vergani D. De novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2004; 40:3–7.
Article
30). Sebagh M, Castillo-Rama M, Azoulay D, Coilly A, Delvart V, Allard MA, et al. Histologic findings predictive of a diagnosis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation in adults. Transplantation. 2013; 96:670–8.
Article
31). Shaikh OS, Demetris AJ. Idiopathic posttransplantation hepatitis? Liver Transpl. 2007; 13:943–6.
Article
32). Herzog D, Soglio DB, Fournet JC, Martin S, Marleau D, Alvarez F. Interface hepatitis is associated with a high incidence of late graft fibrosis in a group of tightly moni-tored pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation patients. Liver Transpl. 2008; 14:946–55.
Article
33). Syn WK, Nightingale P, Gunson B, Hubscher SG, Neuberger JM. Natural history of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007; 13:984–9.
Article
34). Sebagh M, Rifai K, Feray C, Yilmaz F, Falissard B, Roche B, et al. All liver recipients benefit from the protocol 10-year liver biopsies. Hepatology. 2003; 37:1293–301.
Article
35). Martin SR, Russo P, Dubois J, Alvarez F. Centrilobular fibrosis in long-term follow-up of pediatric liver transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2002; 74:828–36.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKSTN
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr