J Korean Med Sci.  2004 Jun;19(3):401-406. 10.3346/jkms.2004.19.3.401.

Experience with Surgical Excision in Childhood Pheochromocytoma

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khy@medimail.co.kr
  • 2Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Pheochromocytoma is one of the potentially fatal causes of childhood hypertension. The study aims to analyze the results of our experiences in pheochromocytomas and the long-term results of its surgical treatment in children. The records of 15 children (11 boys, 4 girls) treated for pheochromocytoma in our unit during the period of 1984 and 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. The average age at surgery was 11.7 yr (range 6 yr 9 months-15 yr 7 months). Localized disease is defined as the cases without the invasion of surrounding tissue, regional disease as the invasion of surrounding tissue and metastatic disease as distant metastases. The mean follow-up after pheochromocytoma excision was 95 months (range 5 to 221 months). Tumors were located in the adrenal gland in 11 (bilaterally in 4) and extra-adrenally in 4. Localized disease occurred in 14 patients and regional disease in one. Only one patient was associated with von Hippel Lindau syndrome. Adrenalectomy or total excision of extra adrenal tumor was performed. Four patients (26.7%) recurred after the first operation (at 2 yr 9 months to 14 yr) and regional disease recurred in one patient three times. Early diagnosis, surgical excision, and long-term follow up are most important for the appropriate treatment of childhood pheochromocytoma.

Keyword

Pheochromocytoma; Child; Therapy; Surgical Procedures, Operative

MeSH Terms

Adolescent
Adrenal Gland Neoplasms/surgery
Adrenal Glands/pathology
Adrenalectomy
Child
Chromaffin Cells/pathology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hippel-Lindau Disease/pathology
Human
Hypertension/etiology
Male
Neoplasm Metastasis
Pheochromocytoma/*surgery
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome

Reference

1. Ciftci AO, Senocak ME, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N. Adrenocortical tumors in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2001. 36:549–554.
Article
2. Pacak K, Linehan WM, Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Goldstein DS. Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Ann Intern Med. 2001. 134:315–329.
Article
3. Kaufman BH, Telander RL, van Heerden JA, Zimmerman D, Sheps SG, Dawson B. Pheochromocytoma in the pediatric age group: Current status. J Pediatr Surg. 1983. 18:879–884.
Article
4. Ein SH, Weitzman S, Thorner P, Seagram CG, Filler RM. Pediatric malignant pheochromocytoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1994. 29:1197–1201.
Article
5. Goldstein RE, O'Neill JA Jr, Holcomb GW 3rd, Morgan WH 3rd, Neblett WW 3rd, Oates JA, Brown N, Nadeau J, Smith B, Page DL, Abumrad NN, Scott HW Jr. Clinical experience over 48 years with pheochromocytoma. Ann Surg. 1999. 229:755–764.
Article
6. Daneman A. Adrenal neoplasms in children. Semin Roentgenol. 1988. 23:205–215.
Article
7. Ross JH. Pheochromocytoma: Special considerations in children. Urol Clin North Am. 2000. 27:393–402.
8. Lucon AM, Pereira MA, Mendonca BB, Halpern A, Wajchenbeg BL, Arap S. Pheochromocytoma: study of 50 cases. J Urol. 1997. 157:1208–1212.
Article
9. Dueck A, Poenaru D, Kamal I. Hypertension following minor trauma: a rare presentation of pheochromocytoma. Pediatr Surg Int. 1999. 15:508–509.
Article
10. Ciftci AO, Tanyel FC, Senocak ME, Buyukpamukcu N. Pheochromocytoma in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2001. 36:447–452.
Article
11. Weise M, Merke DP, Pacak K, Walther MM, Eisenhofer G. Utility of plasma free metanephrines for detecting childhood pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002. 87:1955–1960.
Article
12. Ito Y, Obara T, Okamoto T, Kanbe M, Tanaka R, Iihara M, Okamoto J, Yamazaki K, Jibiki K. Efficacy of single-voided urine metanephrine and normetanephrine assay for diagnosing pheochromocytoma. World J Surg. 1998. 22:684–688.
Article
13. Kopf D, Goretzki PE, Lehnert H. Clinical management of malignant adrenal tumors. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2001. 127:143–155.
Article
14. Cho MH, Jung SE, Lee SC, Park KW, Kim WK. Pheochromocytoma in children: an analysis of five cases. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 1991. 40:794–800.
15. Stanford A, Upperman JS, Nguyen N, Barksdale E Jr, Wiener ES. Surgical management of open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Outcome analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2002. 37:1027–1029.
Article
16. Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, Bender BU, Gimm O, Franke G, Schipper J, Klisch J, Altehoefer C, Zerres K, Januszewicz A, Eng C. Germline mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 2002. 346:1459–1466.
Article
17. Camberos A, Bautista N, Rubenzik M, Applebaum H. Renal artery stenosis and pheochromocytoma: coexistence and treatment. J Pediatr Surg. 2000. 35:714–716.
Article
18. Ein SH, Weitzman S, Thorner P, Seagram CG, Filler RM. Pediatric malignant pheochromocytoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1994. 29:1197–1201.
Article
19. Kaplan RA, Hellerstein S, Alon U. Evaluation of the hypertensive child. Child Nephrol Urol. 1992. 12:106–112.
20. Mobius E, Nies C, Rothmund M. Surgical treatment of pheochromocytomas: laparoscopic or conventional? Surg Endosc. 1999. 13:35–39.
21. Albanese CT, Wiener ES. Routine total bilateral adrenalectomy is not warranted in childhood familial pheochromocytoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1993. 28:1248–1251.
Article
22. Lairmore TC, Ball DW, Baylin SB, Wells SA Jr. Management of pheochromocytomas in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndromes. Ann Surg. 1993. 217:595–601.
Article
23. Telenius-Berg M, Ponder MA, Berg B, Ponder BA, Werner S. Quality of life after bilateral adrenalectomy in MEN 2. Henry Ford Hosp Med J. 1989. 37:160–163.
24. Coutant R, Pein F, Adamsbaum C, Oberlin O, Dubousset J, Guinebretiere JM, Teinturier C, Bougneres PF. Prognosis of children with malignant pheochromocytoma. Horm Res. 1999. 52:145–149.
Article
25. Aguiar RC, Cox G, Pomeroy SL, Dahia PL. Analysis of the SDHD gene, the susceptibility gene for familial paraganglioma syndrome (PGL1), in pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001. 86:2890–2894.
Article
26. Astuti D, Douglas F, Lennard TW, Aligianis IA, Woodward ER, Evans DG, Eng C, Latif F, Maher ER. Germline SDHD mutation in familial phaeochromocytoma. Lancet. 2001. 357:1181–1182.
Article
27. Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, Dahia PL, Douglas F, George E, Skoldberg F, Husebye ES, Eng C, Maher ER. Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet. 2001. 69:49–54.
Article
28. Benn DE, Dwight T, Richardson AL, Delbridge L, Bambach CP, Stowasser M, Gordon RD, Marsh DJ, Robinson BG. Sporadic and familial pheochromocytomas are associated with loss of at least two discrete intervals on chromosome 1p. Cancer Res. 2000. 60:7048–7051.
29. Ein SH, Shandling B, Wesson D, Filler R. Recurrent pheochromocytoma in children. J Pediatr Surg. 1990. 25:1063–1065.
30. Bravo EL. Evolving concepts in the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma. Endocr Rev. 1994. 15:356–368.
Article
31. Marshall DG, Ein SH. Two boys with four pheochromocytomas each. J Pediatr Surg. 1986. 21:815–817.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr