J Korean Med Sci.  2011 Oct;26(10):1333-1338. 10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1333.

Comparison of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh Classification and the Model for End-stage Liver Disease Score as Predictors of the Severity of the Systemic Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Living-donor Liver Transplantation

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jmlee@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2The Rheumatism Research Center, Catholic Research Institute of Medical Science, Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification system and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in predicting the severity of the systemic inflammatory response in living-donor liver transplantation patients. Recipients of liver graft were allocated to a recipient group (n = 39) and healthy donors to a donor group (n = 42). The association between the CTP classification, the MELD scores and perioperative cytokine concentrations in the recipient group was evaluated. The pro-inflammatory cytokines measured included interleukin (IL)-1beta, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha; the anti-inflammatory cytokines measured included IL-10 and IL-4. Cytokine concentrations were quantified using sandwich enzyme-linked immunoassays. The IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-10 concentrations in the recipient group were significantly higher than those in healthy donor group patients. All preoperative cytokine levels, except IL-6, increased in relation to the severity of liver disease, as measured by the CTP classification. Additionally, all cytokine levels, except IL-6, were significantly correlated preoperatively with MELD scores. However, the correlations diminished during the intraoperative period. The CTP classification and the MELD score are equally reliable in predicting the severity of the systemic inflammatory response, but only during the preoperative period.

Keyword

Child-Turcotte-Pugh Classification; Cytokines; Living-Donor Liver Transplantation; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score

MeSH Terms

Adult
Cytokines/*blood
Female
Humans
Interleukin-10/blood
Interleukin-1beta/blood
Interleukin-4/blood
Interleukin-6/blood
Kidney Failure, Chronic/*classification/*surgery
Liver/pathology
*Liver Transplantation
Living Donors
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Severity of Illness Index
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/*diagnosis
Treatment Outcome
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of preoperative cytokine concentrations between groups. The box plots show the median (line in the middle of the box), interquartile range (box), and 10th and 90th percentiles (whiskers). *P < 0.05 versus donor group.


Reference

1. Brown RS Jr, Kumar KS, Russo MW, Kinkhabwala M, Rudow DL, Harren P, Lobritto S, Emond JC. Model for end-stage liver disease and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score as predictors of pretransplantation disease severity, posttransplantation outcome, and resource utilization in United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A patients. Liver Transpl. 2002. 8:278–284.
2. Boin IF, Leonardi MI, Pinto AO, Leme RS, Udo E, Stucchi RS, Soares EC, Leonardi LS. Liver transplant recipients mortality on the waiting list: long-term comparison to Child-Pugh classification and MELD. Transplant Proc. 2004. 36:920–922.
3. Kanwal F, Hays RD, Kilbourne AM, Dulai GS, Gralnek IM. Are physician-derived disease severity indices associated with health-related quality of life in patients with end-stage liver disease? Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. 99:1726–1732.
4. Chan HL, Chim AM, Lau JT, Hui AY, Wong VW, Sung JJ. Evaluation of model for end-stage liver disease for prediction of mortality in decompensated chronic hepatitis B. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006. 101:1516–1523.
5. Said A, Williams J, Holden J, Remington P, Gangnon R, Musat A, Lucey MR. Model for end stage liver disease score predicts mortality across a broad spectrum of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2004. 40:897–903.
6. Schroeder RA, Marroquin CE, Bute BP, Khuri S, Henderson WG, Kuo PC. Predictive indices of morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Ann Surg. 2006. 243:373–379.
7. Hoteit MA, Ghazale AH, Bain AJ, Rosenberg ES, Easley KA, Anania FA, Rutherford RE. Model for end-stage liver disease score versus child score in predicting the outcome of surgical procedures in patients with cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008. 14:1774–1780.
8. Farnsworth N, Fagan SP, Berger DH, Awad SS. Child-Turcotte-Pugh versus MELD score as a predictor of outcome after elective and emergent surgery in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg. 2004. 188:580–583.
9. Wang ZX, Yan LN, Wang WT, Xu MQ, Yang JY. Impact of pretransplant MELD score on posttransplant outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure. Transplant Proc. 2007. 39:1501–1504.
10. Srikureja W, Kyulo NL, Runyon BA, Hu KQ. MELD score is a better prognostic model than Child-Turcotte-Pugh score or Discriminant Function score in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2005. 42:700–706.
11. Limquiaco JL, Wong GL, Wong VW, Lai PB, Chan HL. Evaluation of model for end stage liver disease (MELD)-based systems as prognostic index for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009. 24:63–69.
12. Piekarska A, Zboinska J, Szymczak W, Kuydowicz J. Independent prognostic factors in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008. 55:1034–1040.
13. Kim SY, Yim HJ, Lee J, Lee BJ, Kim DI, Jung SW, Han WS, Lee JS, Koo JS, Seo YS, Yeon JE, Lee HS, Lee SW, Um SH, Byun KS, Choi JH, Ryu HS. Comparison of CTP, MELD, and MELD-Na Scores for predicting short term mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2007. 50:92–100.
14. Boros P, Suehiro T, Curtiss S, Sheiner P, Emre S, Guy S, Schwartz ME, Miller CM. Differential contribution of graft and recipient to perioperative TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8 levels and correlation with early graft function in clinical liver transplantation. Clin Transplant. 1997. 11:588–592.
15. Hassan L, Bueno P, Ferrón-Celma I, Ramia JM, Garrote D, Muffak K, Barrera L, Villar JM, García-Navarro A, Mansilla A, Gomez-Bravo MA, Bernardos A, Ferrón JA. Early postoperative response of cytokines in liver transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2006. 38:2488–2491.
16. Mueller AR, Platz KP, Haak M, Undi H, Müller C, Köttgen E, Weidemann H, Neuhaus P. The release of cytokines, adhesion molecules, and extracellular matrix parameters during and after reperfusion in human liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1996. 62:1118–1126.
17. Lee KW, Son TS, Joh JW, Kim SJ, Park JH, Chon SE, Choi SH, Heo JS, Kim YI, Lee BB, Lee SK. Perioperative cytokine response after liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2003. 35:407–408.
18. Fischer SP, Bader AM, Sweitzer B. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Wiener-Kronish JP, editors. Preoperative evaluation. Miller's anesthesia. 2009. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Churchil Livingstone Elsevier;1027.
19. Flodén A, Castedal M, Friman S, Olausson M, Backman L. Calculation and comparison of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in patients accepted for liver transplantation in 1999 and 2004. Transplant Proc. 2007. 39:385–386.
20. Mishra P, Desai N, Alexander J, Singh DP, Sawant P. Applicability of MELD as a short-term prognostic indicator in patients with chronic liver disease: an Indian experience. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007. 22:1232–1235.
21. Cazzaniga M, Dionigi E, Gobbo G, Fiorette A, Monti V, Salerno F. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome in cirrhotic patients: relationship with their in-hospital outcome. J Hepatol. 2009. 51:475–482.
22. Shawcross DL, Davies NA, Williams R, Jalan R. Systemic inflammatory response exacerbates the neuropsychological effects of induced hyperammonemia in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2004. 40:247–254.
23. Cirera I, Bauer TM, Navasa M, Vila J, Grande L, Taurá P, Fuster J, García-Valdecasas JC, Lacy A, Suárez MJ, Rimola A, Rodés J. Bacterial translocation of enteric organisms in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2001. 34:32–37.
24. Hole A, Unsgaard G. The effect of epidural and general anaesthesia on lymphocyte functions during and after major orthopaedic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1983. 27:135–141.
25. Tønnesen E, Wahlgreen C. Influence of extradural and general anaesthesia on natural killer cell activity and lymphocyte subpopulations in patients undergoing hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth. 1988. 60:500–507.
26. McBride WT, Armstrong MA, McBride SJ. Immunomodulation: an important concept in modern anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1996. 51:465–473.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr