J Bacteriol Virol.  2013 Mar;43(1):18-26. 10.4167/jbv.2013.43.1.18.

Ethical Guidelines for Use of Experimental Animals in Biomedical Research

• Cho A
• Seok SH

• KMID: 1782699
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2013.43.1.18

Abstract

Increasing concerns on animal welfare, the discussion about the necessity and the ethical acceptability of animal experiments is getting important. In this article, we describe ethical issues between the benefits of the animal experiments and the suffering of the animals. If there are no alternatives for animal experiments, the ethical guidelines, 3Rs (Reduction, Replacement, Refinement) by Russell and Burch for humane animal experiments should be considered. Moreover, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) and Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) assist researchers to perform animal testing humanely and safely. We point out three important aspects in support of humane animal experiments; 1) the development of diverse scientific alternatives on the animal testing, 2) the ethical education of animal experiments for researchers, 3) the productive interactions among various social groups on ethics and safety of animal experiments.

Keyword

Animal welfare; Animal experiments; Ethical guidelines; 3Rs; Biosafety

MeSH Terms

Animal Experimentation
Animal Welfare
Animals
Humans
Stress, Psychological

Reference

1). Day N. Animal Experimentation: Cruelty or Science? NJ: Enslow Publisher;2000.

2). Kim MS. Animal Experiment and Deliberation. Philosophy. 2007; 92:231–56.

3). Choo JW, Choi KS, Kwon I. Claims for Animal Right and Ethical Consideration on Primate Experiments. J Korean Bioehics Assoc. 2007; 8:41–53.

4). Regan T. The case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press;1985.

5). Singer P. The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press;1983.

6). Paul ES. Us and Them: Scientists' and Animal Rights Campaigners' Views of the Animal Experimentation Debate. Soc Anim. 1995; 3:1–21.

7). Russell WMS, Burch R. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen;1959.

8). Draize JH, Woodard G, Calvary HO. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. J Pharmacol Exptl Therap. 1944; 82:377–90.

9). Kempermann G, Kuhn HG, Gage FH. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997; 386:493–5.

10). Stafleu FR, Tramper R, Vorstenbosch J, Joles JA. The ethical acceptability of animal experiments: a proposal for a system to support decision-making. Lab Anim. 1999; 33:295–303.

11). Paton WD. Animal Experiment: British and European Legislation and Practice. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1983; 406:201–14.

12). Demers G, Griffin G, De Vroey G, Haywood JR, Zurlo J, Bédard M. Animal research. Harmonization of Animal Care and Use Guidance. Science. 2006; 312:700–1.

13). Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guidelines on: choosing on appreciate endpoint in experiments using animals for research, teaching and testing. 1998. Available from: URL:. http://www.ccac.ca/en_/standards/guidelines.

14). American Veterinary Medical Association. AVMA Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. Available from: URL:. https://www.avma.org/KB/Policies/Documents/euthanasia.pdf.

15). U. S. Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories. 5th ed. Available from: URL:. http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/BMBL.pdf.

16). Cornell University Institutional Biosafety Committee. Animal Biosafety Procedures. Available from: URL:. http://www.ibc.cornell.edu/.