J Korean Med Sci.  2006 Apr;21(2):324-328. 10.3346/jkms.2006.21.2.324.

A Novel Application of Amniotic Membrane in Patients with Bullous Keratopathy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea. jck50ey@kornet.net

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of amniotic membrane in the management of painful bullous keratopathy secondary to the intractable glaucoma and in preventing exposure of drainage devices, we inserted Ahmed valve with amniotic membrane patch graft over the implant itself, and debrided corneal epithelium with amniotic membrane graft over the exposed stroma as a single operation. During the follow-up periods, we monitored vision, intraocular pressure (IOP), presence of ocular pain, and postoperative complications associated with the implants. The mean follow up period was 8.4+/-3.2 months. IOP was well controlled after the intervention. The preoperative mean IOP was measured as 43.9+/-9.0 mmHg and lowered to 16.1+/-1.8 mmHg at the last visit and no complications associated with the implants were noted. Even though the improvement in vision was not prominent, the ocular surface stabilized rapidly and ocular pain associated with bullous keratopathy disappeared soon after surgery. Conclusively the use of amniotic membrane in conjunction with Ahmed valve implantation is an effective way to relieve ocular pain and lessen the chances of complications associated with the implant in patients with intractable glaucoma and bullous keratopathy.

Keyword

Amnion; Bullae; Blister; Corneal Edema; Glaucoma Drainage Implants

MeSH Terms

Retrospective Studies
Middle Aged
Male
Humans
*Glaucoma Drainage Implants
Glaucoma/complications/surgery
Female
Epithelium, Corneal/pathology/surgery
Corneal Transplantation/*methods
Corneal Diseases/etiology/pathology/*surgery
Amnion/*transplantation
Aged

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Sequential diagram of operative procedure. (A) Ahmed valve was implanted and drainage tube is inserted into anterior chamber. (B) Exposed tube was covered with amniotic membrane(AM) folded in half. (C) Cornea was covered with disc shaped AM graft with stromal surface abutting cornea (arrow). (D) Finally, large temporary amniotic membrane graft was placed with amnion side down.

  • Fig. 2 Biomicroscopic finding of clinical cases. Case 1 (A) Preoperative examination reveals corneal opacity, edema, and bulla formation. (B) Examination 3 months after operation reveals that cornea is clear and stable, and small focal melting of amniotic membrane is noted (arrow head). Case 2 (C) Preoperative finding reveals corneal edema and large bulla formation (arrow). (D) Findings 4 months after operation reveals that cornea is well cleared. Case 3 (E) Total corneal opacity with new vessels and bulla formation. (F) 4 months after operation, we can see well attached amniotic membrane and stabilized ocular surface. (G) The Ahmed drainage tube is seen through the amniotic membrane graft. There is no evidence of complications associated with drainage tube.


Reference

1. Allen RC, Bellows AR, Hutchinson BT, Murphy SD. Filtration surgery in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1982. 89:1181–1187.
Article
2. Law SK, Nguyen A, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Comparison of safety and efficacy between silicon and polypropylene Ahmed glaucoma valves in refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2005. 112:1514–1520.
3. Kim JC, Tseng SC. The effects on inhibition of corneal neovascularization after human amniotic membrane transplantation in severely damaged rabbit cornea. Korean J Ophthalmol. 1995. 9:32–46.
4. Molteno AC. New implant for drainage in glaucoma. Clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 1969. 53:606–615.
Article
5. Lloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Heuer DK, Minckler DS, Martone JF. Initial clinical experience with the Baerveldt implant in complicated glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994. 101:640–650.
6. Krupin T, Podos SM, Becker B, Newkirk JB. Valve implants in filtering surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976. 81:232–235.
Article
7. Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, Choplin N, Kotas-Neumann R, Tam M, Bacharach J, Panek WC. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995. 120:23–31.
Article
8. Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, Monshizadeh R, Netland PA, Richard DW, Layden WE. A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998. 105:1968–1976.
9. Brandt JD. Patch grafts of dehydrated cadaveric dura mater for tube-shunt glaucoma surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993. 111:1436–1439.
Article
10. Egrilmez S, Yagci A, Ates H, Azarsiz SS, Andac K. Glaucoma implant surgery with autogenous fascia lata in scleromalacia perforans. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2004. 35:338–342.
Article
11. Smith MF, Doyle JW, Ticrney JW. A comparison of glaucoma drainage implant tube coverage. J Glaucoma. 2000. 11:143–147.
Article
12. Jacob T, LaCour OJ, Burgoyne CF, LaFleur PK, Duzman E. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene reinforcement material in glaucoma drain surgery. J Glaucoma. 2001. 10:115–120.
Article
13. Szentmary N, Szende B, Suveges I. Epithelial cell, keratocyte, and endothelial cell apoptosis in Fuchs' dystrophy and in pseudophakic bullous keratopathy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005. 15:17–22.
14. Funderburgh JL, Hevelone ND, Roth MR, Funderburgh ML, Rodrigues MR, Nirankari VS, Conrad GW. Decorin and biglycan of normal and pathologic human corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998. 39:1957–1964.
15. Lin PY, Wu CC, Lee SM. Combined phototherapeutic keratectomy and therapeutic contact lens for recurrent erosions in bullous keratopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001. 85:908–911.
Article
16. Tsai TC, Su CY, Lin CP. Anterior stromal puncture for bullous keratopathy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2003. 34:371–374.
Article
17. Koenig SB. Annular keratotomy for the treatment of painful bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996. 121:93–94.
Article
18. Alino AM, Perry HD, Kanellopoulos AJ, Donnenfeld ED, Rahn EK. Conjunctival flaps. Ophthalmology. 1998. 105:1120–1123.
Article
19. Pires RT, Tseng SC, Prabhasawat P, Puangsricharern V, Puangsricharern V, Maskin SL, Kim JC, Tan DT. Amniotic membrane transplantation for symptomatic bullous keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999. 117:1291–1297.
Article
20. Kim JC, Tseng SC. Transplantation of preserved human amniotic membrane for surface reconstruction in severely damaged rabbit corneas. Cornea. 1995. 14:473–484.
Article
21. Kim DJ, Yoon KC, Park YG. Amniotic membrane transplantation and use of adjunctive mitomycin C in the treatment of symblepharon. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2005. 46:1108–1113.
22. Cho DY, Chung BS, Choi KC. The effect of amniotic membrane patch in wound healing of skin defect. Korean J Dermatol. 2005. 43:926–932.
23. Kwon YS, Song YS, Kim JC. New treatment for band keratopathy: superficial lamellar keratectomy, EDTA chelation and amniotic membrane transplantation. J Korean Med Sci. 2004. 19:611–615.
Article
24. Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K. Transplantation of amniotic membrane and limbal autograft for patients with recurrent pterygium associated with symblepharon. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998. 82:235–240.
Article
25. Tseng SC, Li DQ, Ma X. Suppression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-β receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol. 1999. 175:325–335.
Article
26. Kim JS, Kim JC, Na BK, Jeong JM, Song CY. Amniotic membrane patching promotes healing and inhibits proteinase activity on wound healing following acute corneal alkali burn. Exp Eye Res. 2000. 70:329–337.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr