Yonsei Med J.  2007 Apr;48(2):147-156. 10.3349/ymj.2007.48.2.147.

Use of Grafts in Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea. swbai@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the use of grafts in pelvic reconstructive surgery. This article will address available graft materials and assess their clinical efficacy and safety. We conducted a Pubmed MEDLINE literature search for full-length English text studies with follow-up periods of at least one year. There are many reports on synthetic and biological graft materials; the majority are not well-designed, have short-term follow-up, small sample sizes, and poor outcome assessment. The use of non-absorbable synthetic grafts may offer excellent anatomical cure rates. However, it is associated with a high incidence of graft-related complications, including healing abnormalities and adverse bladder, bowel, and sexual function effects. These complications can be decreased with absorbable synthetic meshes, but efficacy is lower compared to non-absorbable ones. There is insufficient evidence in favor of biological grafts. In conclusion, based on current knowledge, routine application of grafts in pelvic reconstruction is not recommended. It is preferred that graft utilization be individualized, with close monitoring for complications.

Keyword

Grafts; pelvic reconstructive surgery

Cited by  1 articles

Polymorphism of a COLIA1 Gene Sp1 Binding Site in Korean Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Hye Jin Cho, Hyun Joo Jung, Sei Kwang Kim, Jong Rak Choi, Nam Hoon Cho, Sang Wook Bai
Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(4):564-568.    doi: 10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.564.


Reference

1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. 89:501–506.
2. Shah DK, Paul EM, Rastinehad AR, Eisenberg ER, Badlani GH. Short-term outcome analysis of total pelvic reconstruction with mesh: the vaginal approach. J Urol. 2004. 171:261–263.
3. Amrute KV, Eisenberg ER, Rastinehad AR, Kushner L, Badlani GH. Analysis of outcomes of single polypropylene mesh in total pelvic floor reconstruction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007. 26:53–58.
4. Reisenauer C, Kirschniak A, Drews U, Wallwiener D. Anatomical conditions for pelvic floor reconstruction with polypropylene implant and its application for the treatment of vaginal prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007. 131:214–225.
5. Pulliam SJ, Ferzandi TR, Hota L, Rosenblatt PL. Use of synthetic mesh in pelvic reconstructive surgery: attitudes and practice patterns of urogynecologists. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006. 17:Suppl 3. S457–S458.
6. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997. 1:15–21.
7. Bobyn JD, Wilson GJ, McGregor DC, Pilliar RM, Weatherly GC. Effect of pore size on the peel strength of attachment of fibrous tissue to porous-surfaced implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1982. 16:571–584.
8. Chvapil M, Holusa R, Kliment K, Stoll M. Some chemical and biological characteristics of a new collagen-polymer compound material. J Biomed Mater Res. 1969. 3:315–332.
9. Chu CC, Welch L. Characterization of morphologic and mechanical properties of surgical mesh fabrics. J Biomed Mater Res. 1985. 19:903–916.
10. Dwyer PL, O'Reilly BA. Tranvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG. 2004. 111:831–836.
11. Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Mee SL, Mostwin J, Nitti VW, Zimmern PE, et al. Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 1999. 162:2070–2072.
12. Rechberger T, Postawski K, Jakowicki JA, Gunja-Smith Z, Woessner JF Jr. Role of fascial collagen in stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998. 179:1511–1514.
13. Falconer C, Ekman G, Malmstrom A, Ulmsten U. Decreased collagen synthesis in stress-incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol. 1994. 84:583–586.
14. McLennan MT, Bent AE. Fascia lata suburethral sling vs. Burch retropubic urethropexy. A comparison of morbidity. J Reprod Med. 1998. 43:488–494.
15. Choe JM, Oqan K, Battino BS. Antimicrobial mesh versus vaginal wall sling: a comparative outcomes analysis. J Urol. 2000. 163:1843–1844.
16. Dora CD, Dimarco DS, Zobitz ME, Elliott DS. Time dependent variations in biomechanical properties of cadaveric fascia, porcine dermis, porcine small intestine submucosa, polypropylene mesh and autologous fascia in the rabbit model: implications for sling surgery. J Urol. 2004. 171:1970–1973.
17. Lemer ML, Chaikin DC, Blaivas JG. Tissue strength analysis of autologous and cadaveric allografts for the pubovaginal sling. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999. 8:497–503.
18. Buck BE, Malinin TI. Human bone and tissue allografts. Preparation and safety. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994. 303:8–17.
19. Davila GW, Drutz H, Deprest J. Clinical implications of the biology of grafts: conclusions of the 2005 IUGA Grafts Roundtable. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006. 17:Suppl 1. S51–S55.
20. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 185:1299–1306.
21. Richardson AC, Edmonds PB, Williams NL. Treatment of stress urinary incontinence due to paravaginal fascial defect. Obstet Gynecol. 1981. 57:357–362.
22. Shull BL, Benn SJ, Kuehl TJ. Surgical management of prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall segment: an analysis of support defects, operative morbidity, and anatomical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. 171:1429–1439.
23. Julian TM. The efficacy of Marlex mesh in the repair of severe, recurrent vaginal prolapse of the anterior midvaginal wall. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. 175:1472–1475.
24. Flood CG, Drutz HP, Waja L. Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998. 9:200–204.
25. Nicita G. A new operation for genitourinary prolapse. J Urol. 1998. 160:741–745.
26. Canepa G, Ricciotti G, Introini C, Viqliercio G, Puppo P. Horseshoe-shaped marlex mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor prolapse. Eur Urol. 2001. 39:Suppl 2. 23–27.
27. Migliari R, Usai E. Treatment results using a mixed fiber mesh in patients with grade IV cystocele. J Urol. 1999. 161:1255–1258.
28. Migliari R, De Angelis M, Madeddu G, Verdacchi T. Tension-free vaginal mesh repair for anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Eur Urol. 2000. 38:151–155.
29. Hung ML, Liu FS, Shen PS, Chen GD, Lin LY, Ho ES. Factors that affect recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy procedure reinforced with four-corner anchored polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004. 15:399–406.
30. Milani R, Salvatore S, Soligo M, Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Cortese M. Functional and anatomical outcome of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair with prolene mesh. BJOG. 2005. 112:107–111.
31. de Tayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H. Combined genital prolapse repair reinforced with a polypropylene mesh and tension-free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective case-control study with short-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004. 83:950–954.
32. de Tayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud A, Fernandez H. Tension-free polypropylene mesh for vaginal repair of anterior vaginal wall prolapse. J Reprod Med. 2005. 50:75–80.
33. de Tayrac R, Deffieux X, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H. Long-term anatomical and functional assessment of trans-vaginal cystocele repair using a tension-free polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006. 17:483–488.
34. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystocele and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 184:1357–1362.
35. Cosson M, Collinet P, Occelli B, Narducci F, Crepin G. The vaginal patch plastron for vaginal cure of cystocele. Preliminary results for 47 patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001. 95:73–80.
36. Groutz A, Chaikin DC, Theusen E, Blaivas JG. Use of cadaveric solvent-dehydrated fascia lata for cystocele repair--preliminary results. Urology. 2001. 58:179–183.
37. Kobashi KC, Leach GE, Chon J, Govier FE. Continued multicenter followup of cadaveric prolapse repair with sling. J Urol. 2002. 168:2063–2068.
38. Chung SY, Franks M, Smith CP, Lee JY, Lu SH, Chancellor M. Technique of combined pubovaginal sling and cystocele repair using a single piece of cadaveric dermal graft. Urology. 2002. 59:538–541.
39. Clemons JL, Myers DL, Aguilar VC, Arya LA. Vaginal paravaginal repair with an AlloDerm graft. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 189:1612–1619.
40. Friedman EA, Meltzer RM. Collagen mesh prosthesis for repair of endopelvic fascial defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970. 106:430–433.
41. Salomon LJ, Detchev R, Barranger E, Cortez A, Callard P, Darai E. Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with porcine skin collagen implant by the transobturator route: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 2004. 45:219–225.
42. Leboeuf L, Miles RA, Kim SS, Gousse AE. Grade 4 cystocele repair using four-defect repair and porcine xenograft acellular matrix (Pelvicol): outcome measures using SEAPI. Urology. 2004. 64:282–286.
43. Gomelsky A, Rudy DC, Dmochowski RR. Porcine dermis interposition graft for repair of high grade anterior compartment defects with or without concomitant pelvic organ prolapse procedures. J Urol. 2004. 171:1581–1584.
44. Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Kwon C, Koduri S, Beaumont JL, Abramov Y, et al. A prospective randomized trial using solvent dehydrated fascia lata for the prevention of recurrent anterior vaginal wall prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 192:1649–1654.
45. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997. 104:82–86.
46. Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand PK. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 105:314–318.
47. de Tayrac R, Picone O, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H. A 2-year anatomical and functional assessment of transvaginal rectocele repair using a polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006. 17:100–105.
48. Oster S, Astrup A. A new vaginal operation for recurrent and large rectocele using dermis transplant. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1981. 60:493–495.
49. Kohli N, Miklos JR. Dermal graft-augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003. 14:146–149.
50. Altman D, Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Falconer C, Hjern F, et al. Functional and anatomic outcome after transvaginal rectocele repair using collagen mesh: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005. 48:1233–1242.
51. Dell JR, O'Kelley KR. PelviSoft Biomesh augmentation of rectocele repair: the initial clinical experience in 35 patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005. 16:44–47.
52. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004. 104:805–823.
53. Hilger WS, Poulson M, Norton PA. Long-term results of abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003. 189:1606–1611.
54. Gregory WT, Otto LN, Berqstrom JO, Clark AL. Surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy with synthetic mesh versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy with cadaveric fascia lata. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005. 16:369–374.
55. Petros PE. Vault prolapse II: Restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001. 12:296–303.
56. Farnsworth BN. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002. 13:4–8.
57. Jordaan DJ, Prollius A, Cronje HS, Nel M. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006. 17:326–329.
58. Lo TS, Horng SG, Huang HJ, Lee SJ, Liang CC. Repair of recurrent vaginal vault prolapse using sacrospinous ligament fixation with mesh interposition and reinforcement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005. 84:992–995.
59. Hilger WS, Cornella JL. Rectovaginal fistula after posterior intravaginal slingplasty and polypropylene mesh augmented rectocele repair. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006. 17:89–92.
60. Baessler K, Hewson AD, Tunn R, Schuessler B, Maher CF. Severe mesh complications following intravaginal slingplasty. Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 106:713–716.
Full Text Links
  • YMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr