Korean J Urol.  2014 Nov;55(11):693-702. 10.4111/kju.2014.55.11.693.

Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea. honguro4@hanmail.net

Abstract

Quality of life is adversely affected by pelvic organ prolapse, the prevalence of which is increasing because of the persistently growing older population. Today, the tension-free vaginal mesh kit has grown in popularity owing to its comparable cure rate to traditional reconstructive surgery and the feasibility of an early return to normal life. However, significant debate remains over the long-term cure rate and the safety of tension-free vaginal mesh in the United States. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommends obtaining informed consent about the safety and cure rate when the patient chooses surgery using the tension-free vaginal mesh kit or meshes before surgery. The goal of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse is the restoration of anatomic defects. This review article provides an overview of basic surgical techniques and the results, advantages, and disadvantages of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Keyword

Cystocele; Pelvic organ prolapse; Reconstructive surgical procedures; Surgical mesh

MeSH Terms

*Disease Management
Female
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/*methods
Humans
Pelvic Organ Prolapse/*surgery
Quality of Life

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Robotic sacrocolpopexy. Adapted with permission from KS Lee, MD, PhD (Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea).


Reference

1. Subak LL, Waetjen LE, van den Eeden S, Thom DH, Vittinghoff E, Brown JS. Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98:646–651. PMID: 11576582.
Article
2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89:501–506. PMID: 9083302.
Article
3. Hagen S, Stark D, Maher C, Adams E. Conservative management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (2):CD003882. PMID: 15106225.
Article
4. Kegel AH. Progressive resistance exercise in the functional restoration of the perineal muscles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1948; 56:238–248. PMID: 18877152.
Article
5. Kisner C, Colby LA. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and tchniques. 4th ed. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Co;2003.
6. Deger RB, Menzin AW, Mikuta JJ. The vaginal pessary: past and present. Postgrad Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 13:1–8.
7. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190:345–350. PMID: 14981372.
Article
8. Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL. Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med. 1993; 38:919–923. PMID: 8120847.
Article
9. Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G. A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90:990–994. PMID: 9397117.
Article
10. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL. Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 190:1025–1029. PMID: 15118635.
Article
11. Citgez S, Demirkesen O, Ozdemir F, Gevher F, Demirdag C, Onal B, et al. Transvaginal repair using acellular collagen biomesh for the treatment of anterior prolapse. Urol J. 2014; 11:1271–1277. PMID: 24595936.
12. Delroy CA, Castro Rde A, Dias MM, Feldner PC Jr, Bortolini MA, Girao MJ, et al. The use of transvaginal synthetic mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24:1899–1907. PMID: 23632800.
Article
13. Young SB, Daman JJ, Bony LG. Vaginal paravaginal repair: one-year outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185:1360–1366. PMID: 11744910.
Article
14. Bruce RG, El-Galley RE, Galloway NT. Paravaginal defect repair in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence and cystocele. Urology. 1999; 54:647–651. PMID: 10510922.
Article
15. Scotti RJ, Garely AD, Greston WM, Flora RF, Olson TR. Paravaginal repair of lateral vaginal wall defects by fixation to the ischial periosteum and obturator membrane. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179(6 Pt 1):1436–1445. PMID: 9855578.
Article
16. Miklos JR, Kohli N. Laparoscopic paravaginal repair plus burch colposuspension: review and descriptive technique. Urology. 2000; 56(6 Suppl 1):64–69. PMID: 11114565.
Article
17. Porges RF, Smilen SW. Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171:1518–1526. PMID: 7802061.
Article
18. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185:1299–1304. PMID: 11744900.
Article
19. Chesson RR, Schlossberg SM, Elkins TE, Menefee S, McCammon K, Franco N, et al. The use of fascia lata graft for correction of severe or recurrent anterior vaginal wall defects. J Pelvic Surg. 1999; 5:96–103.
20. Sand PK, Koduri S, Lobel RW, Winkler HA, Tomezsko J, Culligan PJ, et al. Prospective randomized trial of polyglactin 910 mesh to prevent recurrence of cystoceles and rectoceles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184:1357–1362. PMID: 11408853.
Article
21. Natale F, La Penna C, Padoa A, Agostini M, De Simone E, Cervigni M. A prospective, randomized, controlled study comparing Gynemesh, a synthetic mesh, and Pelvicol, a biologic graft, in the surgical treatment of recurrent cystocele. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009; 20:75–81. PMID: 18923805.
Article
22. Altman D, Vayrynen T, Engh ME, Axelsen S, Falconer C. Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group. Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:1826–1836. PMID: 21561348.
Article
23. Lovatsis D, Drutz HP. Is transabdominal repair of mild to moderate cystocele necessary for correction of prolapse during a modified Burch procedure? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12:193–198. PMID: 11451008.
Article
24. Withagen MI, Milani AL, den Boon J, Vervest HA, Vierhout ME. Trocar-guided mesh compared with conventional vaginal repair in recurrent prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117(2 Pt 1):242–250. PMID: 21252735.
Article
25. Rodriguez LV, Bukkapatnam R, Shah SM, Raz S. Transvaginal paravaginal repair of high-grade cystocele central and lateral defects with concomitant suburethral sling: report of early results, outcomes, and patient satisfaction with a new technique. Urology. 2005; 66(5 Suppl):57–65. PMID: 16194709.
Article
26. Walters MD. Pelvic floor prolapse: cystocele and rectocele. In : Walters MD, Karram MM, editors. Clinical urogynecology. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book;1993. p. 225–236.
27. Richardson AC. The rectovaginal septum revisited: its relationship to rectocele and its importance in rectocele repair. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 36:976–983. PMID: 8293598.
Article
28. Francis WJ, Jeffcoate TN. Dyspareunia following vaginal operations. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1961; 68:1–10. PMID: 13701244.
Article
29. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997; 104:82–86. PMID: 8988702.
30. Lim YN, Muller R, Corstiaans A, Hitchins S, Barry C, Rane A. A long-term review of posterior colporrhaphy with Vypro 2 mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007; 18:1053–1057. PMID: 17216133.
Article
31. de Tayrac R, Devoldere G, Renaudie J, Villard P, Guilbaud O, Eglin G, et al. Prolapse repair by vaginal route using a new protected low-weight polypropylene mesh: 1-year functional and anatomical outcome in a prospective multicentre study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007; 18:251–256. PMID: 16699914.
Article
32. Schmidlin-Enderli K, Schuessler B. A new rectovaginal fascial plication technique for treatment of rectocele with obstructed defecation: a proof of concept study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013; 24:613–619. PMID: 22890282.
Article
33. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Baessler K, Schluter PJ. Midline rectovaginal fascial plication for repair of rectocele and obstructed defecation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104:685–689. PMID: 15458886.
Article
34. Singh K, Cortes E, Reid WM. Evaluation of the fascial technique for surgical repair of isolated posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 101:320–324. PMID: 12576256.
Article
35. Nichols DH, Randall CL. Posterior colporrhaphy and perineorrhaphy. In : Nichols DH, Randal CL, editors. Vaginal surgery. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincortt Williams & Wilkins;1996. p. 257–289.
36. Abramov Y, Gandhi S, Goldberg RP, Botros SM, Kwon C, Sand PK. Site-specific rectocele repair compared with standard posterior colporrhaphy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105:314–318. PMID: 15684158.
Article
37. Glavind K, Madsen H. A prospective study of the discrete fascial defect rectocele repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79:145–147. PMID: 10696964.
Article
38. Cundiff GW, Weidner AC, Visco AG, Addison WA, Bump RC. An anatomic and functional assessment of the discrete defect rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179(6 Pt 1):1451–1456. PMID: 9855580.
Article
39. Kenton K, Shott S, Brubaker L. Outcome after rectovaginal fascia reattachment for rectocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181:1360–1363. PMID: 10601913.
Article
40. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM. The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 181:1353–1358. PMID: 10601912.
Article
41. Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195:1762–1771. PMID: 17132479.
Article
42. Randall CL, Nichols DH. Surgical treatment of vaginal inversion. Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 38:327–332. PMID: 5094313.
43. Meuman N, Natalia S, Vladimir S, Jacob B. Anterior needle-guided mesh in advanced pelvic organ prolapse: apical fixation on sacrospinous ligaments. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 172:120–123. PMID: 24210791.
44. Hefni MA, El-Toukhy TA. Long-term outcome of vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for marked uterovaginal and vault prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 127:257–263. PMID: 16377061.
Article
45. Nichols DH. Massive eversion of the vagina. In : Nichols DH, editor. Gynecologic and obstetric surgery. St. Louis: Mosby;1993. p. 431–464.
46. Nieminen K, Huhtala H, Heinonen PK. Anatomic and functional assessment and risk factors of recurrent prolapse after vaginal sacrospinous fixation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82:471–478. PMID: 12752079.
Article
47. Karram MM, Sze EH, Walters MD. Surgical treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. In : Walters MD, Karram MM, editors. Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby;1999. p. 235–256.
48. Paraiso MF, Ballard LA, Walters MD, Lee JC, Mitchinson AR. Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 175:1423–1430. PMID: 8987920.
Article
49. Thompson JR, Gibb JS, Genadry R, Burrows L, Lambrou N, Buller JL. Anatomy of pelvic arteries adjacent to the sacrospinous ligament: importance of the coccygeal branch of the inferior gluteal artery. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94:973–977. PMID: 10576185.
Article
50. Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ. A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183:1365–1373. PMID: 11120498.
Article
51. Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC. Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183:1402–1410. PMID: 11120503.
Article
52. Cosma S, Menato G, Preti M, Petruzzelli P, Tin MC, Riboni F, et al. Advanced utero-vaginal prolapse and vaginal vault suspension: synthetic mesh vs native tissue repair. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014; 289:1053–1060. PMID: 24305747.
Article
53. Meeks GR, Washburne JF, McGehee RP, Wiser WL. Repair of vaginal vault prolapse by suspension of the vagina to iliococcygeus (prespinous) fascia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171:1444–1452. PMID: 7802052.
54. Maher CF, Murray CJ, Carey MP, Dwyer PL, Ugoni AM. Iliococcygeus or sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98:40–44. PMID: 11430954.
Article
55. Medina CA, Croce C, Candiotti K, Takacs P. Comparison of vaginal length after iliococcygeus fixation and sacrospinous ligament fixation. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008; 100:267–270. PMID: 18022624.
Article
56. Petros PE. Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal supports by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001; 12:296–303. PMID: 11715994.
57. Farnsworth BN. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002; 13:4–8. PMID: 11999204.
58. Sivaslioglu AA, Ilhan TT, Aydogmus S, Uzun M, Dolen I. The comparison of the anatomical and symptomatic outcomes of sacrocolpopexy and posterior intravaginal slingoplasty. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22:1363–1368. PMID: 21562912.
Article
59. Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962; 20:72–77. PMID: 14462011.
Article
60. Shull BL, Bachofen CG. Enterocele and rectocele. In : Walters MD, Karram MM, editors. Urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby;1999. p. 221–234.
61. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly A, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104:805–823. PMID: 15458906.
Article
62. Maher C, Baessler K, Glazener CM, Adams EJ, Hagen S. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2008; 27:3–12. PMID: 18092333.
Article
63. Tulikangas PK, Piedmonte MR, Weber AM. Functional and anatomic follow-up of enterocele repairs. Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98:265–268. PMID: 11506843.
Article
64. Waters EG. Vaginal prolapse; technic for correction and prevention at hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1956; 8:432–436. PMID: 13370010.
65. Wheeless CR Jr. Vaginal repair of enterocele. In : Wheeless CR, editor. Atlas of pelvic surgery. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;1997. p. 56–61.
66. McCall ML. Posterior culdeplasty; surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. Obstet Gynecol. 1957; 10:595–602. PMID: 13484166.
67. Crigler B, Zakaria M, Hart S. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse. Surg Technol Int. 2012; 22:195–202. PMID: 23225594.
68. Koyama M, Yoshida S, Koyama S, Ogita K, Kimura T, Shimoya K, et al. Surgical reinforcement of support for the vagina in pelvic organ prolapse: concurrent iliococcygeus fascia colpopexy (Inmon technique). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005; 16:197–202. PMID: 15875235.
Article
69. Sergent F, Resch B, Loisel C, Bisson V, Schaal JP, Marpeau L. Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 156:217–222. PMID: 21353736.
Article
70. Elliott DS, Frank I, Dimarco DS, Chow GK. Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: Sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Surg. 2004; 188(4A Suppl):52S–56S. PMID: 15476652.
Article
71. Kramer BA, Whelan CM, Powell TM, Schwartz BF. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse. J Endourol. 2009; 23:655–658. PMID: 19335154.
Article
72. Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA. Rbotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54:342–346. PMID: 21304307.
73. el-Toukhy TA, Davies AE. The efficacy of laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: results of a prospective controlled study. BJU Int. 2001; 88:361–366. PMID: 11564022.
Article
74. Valpas A, Kivela A, Penttinen J, Kauko M, Kujansuu E, Tomas E, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape and laparoscopic mesh colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: immediate outcome and complications: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82:665–671. PMID: 12790850.
75. Prezioso D, Iacono F, Di Lauro G, Illiano E, Romeo G, Ruffo A, et al. Stress urinary incontinence: long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. BMC Surg. 2013; 13(Suppl 2):S38. PMID: 24268031.
Article
76. Daneshgari F, Kefer JC, Moore C, Kaouk J. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes. BJU Int. 2007; 100:875–879. PMID: 17822467.
Article
77. Francis SL, Agrawal A, Azadi A, Ostergard DR, Deveneau NE. Robotic Burch colposuspension: a surgical case and instructional video. Int Urogynecol J. 2014; 7. 17. [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2471-1.
Article
78. Rivoire C, Botchorishvili R, Canis M, Jardon K, Rabischong B, Wattiez A, et al. Complete laparoscopic treatment of genital prolapse with meshes including vaginal promontofixation and anterior repair: a series of 138 patients. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007; 14:712–718. PMID: 17980331.
Article
79. Gunn GC, Cooper RP, Gordon NS, Gagnon L. Use of a new device for endoscopic suturing in the laparoscopic Burch procedure. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994; 2:65–70. PMID: 9050535.
Article
80. Wang Y, Wang D, Li Y, Liang Z, Xu H. Laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for uterovaginal prolapse: experience with 93 cases. Int Urogynecol J. 2011; 22:83–89. PMID: 20740359.
Article
81. Morley GW, DeLancey JO. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for eversion of the vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 158:872–881. PMID: 3364499.
Article
82. Sze EH, Karram MM. Transvaginal repair of vault prolapse: a review. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89:466–475. PMID: 9052607.
Article
83. Rosenblum N. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2012; 22:292–296. PMID: 22647648.
Article
84. Nguyen JN, Burchette RJ. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111:891–898. PMID: 18378748.
85. Kahn MA, Stanton SL, Kumar D, Fox SD. Posterior colporrhaphy is superior to the transanal repair for the treatment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse [abstract]. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999; 18:329–330.
86. Milani AL, Withagen MI, Schweitzer KJ, Janszen EW, Vierhout ME. Midline fascial plication under continuous digital transrectal control: which factors determine anatomic outcome? Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21:623–630. PMID: 20146055.
Article
87. Yurteri-Kaplan LA, Gutman RE. The use of biological materials in urogynecologic reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130(5 Suppl 2):242S–253S. PMID: 23096979.
88. Hiltunen R, Nieminen K, Takala T, Heiskanen E, Merikari M, Niemi K, et al. Low-weight polypropylene mesh for anterior vaginal wall prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(2 Pt 2):455–462. PMID: 17666627.
89. FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary [Internet]. Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Food and Drug Administration;cited 2014 Nov 5. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/publichealthnotifications/ucm061976.htm.
90. AUA position statement on the use of vaginal mesh for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence [Internet]. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association;cited 2014 Nov 5. Available from: http://www.auanet.org/about/vaginal-mesh-for-sui.cfm.
91. AUA position statement on the use of vaginal mesh for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse [Internet]. Linthicum, MD: American Urological Association;cited 2014 Nov 5. Available from: http://www.auanet.org/about/vaginal-mesh-for-pelvic-organ-prolapse.cfm.
92. Goldman J, Ovadia J, Feldberg D. The Neugebauer-Le Fort operation: a review of 118 partial colpocleises. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1981; 12:31–35. PMID: 7195840.
Article
93. Langmade CF, Oliver JA Jr. Partial colpocleisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 154:1200–1205. PMID: 3717230.
Article
94. Kovac SR, Zimmerman CW, editors. Advances in reconstructive vaginal surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2007.
95. DeLancey JO, Morley GW. Total colpocleisis for vaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176:1228–1232. PMID: 9215178.
Article
96. Ridley JH. Evaluation of the colpocleisis operation: a report of fifty-eight cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972; 113:1114–1119. PMID: 4635182.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr