J Korean Med Sci.  2007 Jun;22(3):425-430. 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.3.425.

Distinct Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) Runs of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Microsatellite Markers; Implications for Use of Mixed Marker Haplotypes in LD-based Mapping

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chunchon, Korea.
  • 2Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. jwonk@smc.samsung.co.kr

Abstract

It has been suggested that the haplotypic relationship between microsatellite markers and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is of considerable importance, as microsatellite markers can potentially be incorporated into haplotypes containing SNPs to increase marker density across a region of interest. However, SNPs and microsatellite markers have different mutation rates and durations, and it is conceivable that the linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns between the genetic markers may considerably differ. We assessed the LD patterns using 1,661 SNPs and 65 microsatellite markers along chromosome 22 and investigated whether common patterns of LD between the two genetic markers are deduced from the results. The results demonstrated that the patterns of LD among microsatellite markers varied considerably and the LD runs of SNPs and microsatellite markers showed distinct patterns. Microsatellite markers have a much higher mutation rate and the evolution of microsatellite markers is a more complex process which has distinct mutation properties from those of SNPs. We consider that these might contribute to the different LD patterns between the two genetic markers. Therefore, it would seem inadvisable to make assumptions about persistence of LD across even a relatively small genetic distance among microsatellite markers and to construct mixed marker haplotypes/LD maps employing microsatellite markers.

Keyword

Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms; Microsatellite Markers; Linkage Disequilibrium

MeSH Terms

Algorithms
Chromosome Mapping
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 22
Genetics, Population
Genotype
Great Britain
*Haplotypes
Heterozygote
Humans
Iceland
Korea
*Linkage Disequilibrium
Microsatellite Repeats/*genetics
Mutation
*Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Comparison of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns among single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the Korean and UK populations. (A) Average D' and γ2 coefficients (top and bottom groups, respectively) plotted in sliding windows containing all common polymorphisms separated by 50 and 500 kb in successive 1.7-Mb segments. (B) D' confidence limits calculated by the bootstrap method. The upper (U) and lower (L) bounds represents the 5% tails of the overall probability distribution. Two enhanced views provide the D' confidence limits from 24-32 Mb and 33-41 Mb, respectively. Korean, green; U.K., red.

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) patterns among microsatellite markers in the Korean and Icelandic populations. (A) D' coefficients estimated by the EM algorithm in the Icelandic founders and calculated by bootstrap and permutation with haplotype data constructed from the Icelandic family genotype data. (B) D' coefficients (heterozygosity 0.657 and 0.668 in the Korean and Icelandic populations, respectively). (C) D' confidence limits calculated by bootstrap method. The upper (U) and lower (L) bounds represent the 5% tails of the overall probability distribution. Korean, green; Icelander, red.

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of the LD patterns detected using SNP and microsatellite markers in the Korean population. (A) Average D' plotted in sliding window containing all common SNPs and D' coefficients of microsatellite markers. (B) D' confidence limits. Microsatellite markers, green; SNPs, red.


Reference

1. Mohlke KL, Lange EM, Valle TT, Ghosh S, Magnuson VL, Silander K, Watanabe RM, Chines PS, Bergman RN, Tuomilehto J, Collins FS, Boehnke M. Linkage disequilibrium between microsatellite markers extends beyond 1 cM on chromosome 20 in Finns. Genome Res. 2001. 11:1221–1226.
Article
2. Merriman TR, Eaves IA, Twells RC, Merriman ME, Danoy PA, Muxworthy CE, Hunter KM, Cox RD, Cucca F, McKinney PA, Shield JP, Baum JD, Tuomilehto J, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Ionesco-Tirgoviste C, Joner G, Thorsby E, Undlien DE, Pociot F, Nerup J, Ronningen KS, Bain SC, Todd JA. Transmission of haplotypes of microsatellite markers rather than single marker alleles in the mapping of a putative type 1 diabetes susceptibility gene (IDDM6). Hum Mol Genet. 1998. 7:517–524.
3. Feder JN, Gnirke A, Thomas W, Tsuchihashi Z, Ruddy DA, Basava A, Dormishian F, Domingo R Jr, Ellis MC, Fullan A, Hinton LM, Jones NL, Kimmel BE, Kronmal GS, Lauer P, Lee VK, Loeb DB, Mapa FA, McClelland E, Meyer NC, Mintier GA, Moeller N, Moore T, Morikang E, Prass CE, Quintana L, Starnes SM, Schatzman RC, Brunke KJ, Drayna DT, Risch NJ, Bacon BR, Wolff RK. A novel MHC class I-like gene is mutated in patients with hereditary haemochromatosis. Nat Genet. 1996. 13:399–408.
Article
4. Burgner D, Rockett K, Ackerman H, Hull J, Usen S, Pinder M, Kwiatkowski DP. Haplotypic relationship between SNP and microsatellite markers at the NOS2A locus in two populations. Genes Immun. 2003. 4:506–514.
Article
5. Nakajima T, Jorde LB, Ishigami T, Umemura S, Emi M, Lalouel JM, Inoue I. Nucleotide diversity and haplotype structure of the human angiotensinogen gene in two populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2002. 70:108–123.
Article
6. Varilo T, Paunio T, Parker A, Perola M, Meyer J, Terwilliger JD, Peltonen L. The interval of linkage disequilibrium (LD) detected with microsatellite and SNP markers in chromosomes of Finnish populations with different histories. Hum Mol Genet. 2003. 1:51–59.
Article
7. Tishkoff SA, Dietzsch E, Speed W, Pakstis AJ, Kidd JR, Cheung K, Bonne-Tamir B, Santachiara-Benerecetti AS, Moral P, Krings M. Global patterns of linkage disequilibrium at the CD4 locus and modern human origins. Science. 1996. 271:1380–1387.
Article
8. Tishkoff SA, Goldman A, Calafell F, Speed WC, Deinard AS, Bonne-Tamir B, Kidd JR, Pakstis AJ, Jenkins T, Kidd KK. A global haplotype analysis of the myotonic dystrophy locus: implications for the evolution of modern humans and for the origin of myotonic dystrophy mutations. Am J Hum Genet. 1998. 62:1389–1402.
Article
9. Kidd KK, Morar B, Castiglione CM, Zhao H, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Bonne-Tamir B, Lu RB, Goldman D, Lee C, Nam YS, Grandy DK, Jenkins T, Kidd JR. A global survey of haplotype frequencies and linkage disequilibrium at the DRD2 locus. Hum Genet. 1998. 103:211–227.
Article
10. Tishkoff SA, Pakstis AJ, Stoneking M, Kidd JR, Destro-Bisol G, Sanjantila A, Lu RB, Deinard AS, Sirugo G, Jenkins T, Kidd KK, Clark AG. Short tandem-repeat polymorphism/alu haplotype variation at the PLAT locus: implications for modern human origins. Am J Hum Genet. 2000. 67:901–925.
Article
11. Dawson E, Abecasis GR, Bumpstead S, Chen Y, Hunt S, Beare DM, Pabial J, Dibling T, Tinsley E, Kirby S, Carter D, Papaspyridonos M, Livingstone S, Ganske R, Lohmussaar E, Zernant J, Tonisson N, Remm M, Magi R, Puurand T, Vilo J, Kurg A, Rice K, Deloukas P, Mott R, Metspalu A, Bentley DR, Cardon LR, Dunham I. A first-generation linkage disequilibrium map of human chromosome 22. Nature. 2002. 1:544–548.
Article
12. Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Nilsen GB, Halperin E, Eskin E, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science. 2005. 307:1072–1079.
Article
13. Patil N, Berno AJ, Hinds DA, Barrett WA, Doshi JM, Hacker CR, Kautzer CR, Lee DH, Marjoribanks C, McDonough DP, Nguyen BT, Norris MC, Sheehan JB, Shen N, Stern D, Stokowski RP, Thomas DJ, Trulson MO, Vyas KR, Frazer KA, Fodor SP, Cox DR. Blocks of limited haplotype diversity revealed by high-resolution scanning of human chromosome 21. Science. 2001. 294:1719–1723.
Article
14. Zavattari P, Deidda E, Whalen M, Lampis R, Mulargia A, Loddo M, Eaves I, Mastio G, Todd JA, Cucca F. Major factors influencing linkage disequilibrium by analysis of different chromosome regions in distinct populations: demography, chromosome recombination frequency and selection. Hum Mol Genet. 2000. 12:2947–2957.
Article
15. Kong A, Gudbjartsson DF, Sainz J, Jonsdottir GM, Gudjonsson SA, Richardsson B, Sigurdardottir S, Barnard J, Hallbeck B, Masson G, Shlien A, Palsson ST, Frigge ML, Thorgeirsson TE, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K. A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome. Nat Genet. 2002. 31:241–247.
Article
16. Aulchenko YS, Axenovich TI, Mackay I, van Duijn CM. miLD and booLD programs for calculation and analysis of corrected linkage disequilibrium. Ann Hum Genet. 2003. 67:372–375.
Article
17. Brookes AJ. The essence of SNPs. Gene. 1999. 234:177–186.
Article
18. Ellegren H. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2004. 5:435–445.
Article
19. Kruglyak S, Durrett RT, Schug MD, Aquadro CF. Equilibrium distributions of microsatellite repeat length resulting from a balance between slippage events and point mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998. 95:10774–10778.
Article
20. Santibanez-Koref MF, Gangeswaran R, Hancock JM. A relationship between lengths of microsatellites and nearby substitution rates in mammalian genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2001. 18:2119–2123.
21. Amos W, Sawcer SJ, Feakes RW, Rubinsztein DC. Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nat Genet. 1996. 13:390–391.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr