Korean J Radiol.  2008 Dec;9(6):572-576. 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.6.572.

Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Sacral Metastatic Tumors Under Fluoroscopic Guidance Only

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Sixth Affiliated People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Yi Shan Road Shanghai, China. zh_ji@hotmail.com

Abstract

Percutaneous sacroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for sacral insufficient fractures under CT or fluoroscopic guidance; although, few reports exist about sacral metastatic tumors. We designed a pilot study to treat intractable pain caused by a sacral metastatic tumor with sacroplasty. A 62-year-old man and a 38-year-old woman with medically intractable pain due to metastatic tumors of S1 from lymphoma and lung cancer, respectively, underwent percutaneous sacroplasty. Over the course of the follow-up period, the two patients experienced substantial and immediate pain relief that persisted over a 3-month and beyond. The woman had deposition of PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) in the needle track, but did not experience significant symptoms. No other peri-procedural complications were observed for either patient.

Keyword

Metastatic tumors, sacroplasty; Interventional procedure technology

MeSH Terms

Adult
Bone Cements/*therapeutic use
Female
*Fluoroscopy
Humans
Injections, Intralesional
Male
Middle Aged
Pain, Intractable/etiology/*therapy
Polymethyl Methacrylate/administration & dosage
*Radiography, Interventional
*Sacrum
Spinal Neoplasms/complications/radiography/*secondary
*Vertebroplasty/methods

Figure

  • Fig. 1 62-year-old man with metastasis at T12, L1, L2, L3, and S1 level from lymphoma. A, B. Sagittal CT (A) shows mixed sclerotic and poorly marinated low attenuation lesion in S1. Sagittal T2-weighted with fat saturated MR image (B) shows high band-like signal at periphery and iso-to-low signal in central portion of lesion. C. Transaxial schematic drawing demonstrates that trans-sacroiliac joint approach and positioning of 13-gauge bevel-edge needle is recommended for sacroplasties. Needle courses ilium, sacroiliac joint and sacral pedicle to center of lesion. Rotating needle to aim bevel-edge needle toward nerve root is recommended to avoid injury. D, E. Lateral (D) and anteroposterior (E) fluoroscopic versions reveal location of needle tip in lesion. F, G. Lateral (F) and anteroposterior (G) post-operative fluoroscopic views show equal distribution of cement with no cement migration and leakage at T12, L1, L2, L3, and S1.

  • Fig. 2 38-year-old woman with metastatic tumor at S1, originating from lung cancer. A, B. Sagittal T2-weighted with fat saturated MR imaging (A) shows abnormal signal at S1. Axial CT scan (B) demonstrates osteolytic change of S1, which is characterized by breakdown of peri-cortex of S1 and S1 foramen. C, D. Anteroposterior (C) and lateral (D) views of postoperative fluoroscopy shows no cement migration. In addition, there is little cement leakage from needle track (arrows). Patient had no significant symptoms.


Cited by  1 articles

Percutaneous Sacroplasty for Painful Sacral Metastases Involving Multiple Sacral Vertebral Bodies: Initial Experience with an Interpedicular Approach
Qing-Hua Tian, He-Fei Liu, Tao Wang, Ying-Sheng Cheng, Chun-Gen Wu
Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(6):939-946.    doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0803.


Reference

1. Strub WM, Hoffmann M, Ernst RJ, Bulas RV. Sacroplasty by CT and fluoroscopic guidance: is the procedure right for your patient? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007. 28:38–41.
2. Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, Morris P. Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficient fractures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003. 24:1003–1007.
3. Dehdashti AR, Martin JB, Jean B, Rufenacht DA. PMMA cementoplasty in symptomatic metastatic lesions of the S1 vertebral body. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000. 23:235–237.
4. Uemura A, Fujimoto H, Yasuda S, Osaka I, Goto N, Shinozaki M, et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization for bone metastases from hepatocelluar carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2001. 11:1457–1462.
5. Pascal-Moussellard H, Broc G, Pointillart V, Simeon F, Vital JM, Senegas J. Complications of vertebral metastasis surgery. Eur Spine J. 1998. 7:438–444.
6. Sundaresan N, Sachdev VP, Holland JF, Moore F, Sung M, Paciucci PA, et al. Surgical treatment of spinal cord compression from epidural metastasis. J Clin Oncol. 1995. 13:2330–2335.
7. Kelekis A, Lovblad KO, Mehdizade A, Somon T, Yilmaz H, Wetzel SG, et al. Pelvic osteoplasty in osteolytic metastases: technical approach under fluoroscopic guidance and early clinical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005. 16:81–88.
8. Li AF, Li KC, Chang FY, Hsieh CH. Preliminary report of transpedicle body augmenter vertebroplasty in painful vertebral tumors. Spine. 2006. 31:E805–E812.
9. Baroud G, Samara M, Steffen T. Influence of mixing method on the cement temperature-mixing time history and doughing time of three acrylic cements for vertebroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004. 68:112–116.
10. Belkoff SM, Molloy S. Temperature measurement during polymerization of polymethylmethacrylate cement used for vertebroplasty. Spine. 2003. 28:1555–1559.
Full Text Links
  • KJR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr