Skip Navigation
Skip to contents
Results by Year

View Wide

Filter

ARTICLE TYPE

PUBLICATION DATE

7 results
Display

Utilization of Spinal Navigation to Facilitate Hassle-Free Rod Placement during Minimally-Invasive Long-Construct Posterior Instrumentation

Kaliya-Perumal AK, Limthongkul W, Oh JY

During minimally-invasive long-construct posterior instrumentation, it may be challenging to contour and place the rod as the screw heads are not visualized. To overcome this, we utilized the image data...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
An Expanded Surgical Corridor of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L4–5: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Limthongkul W, Praisarnti P, Tanasansomboon T, Prasertkul N, Kotheeranurak V, Yingsakmongkol W, Singhatanadgige W

Objective: We introduced a new preoperative method, the “expanded surgical corridor,” to evaluate the actual safety corridor, which may expand the possibility of performing oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF). Methods: Axial...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Yingsakmongkol W, Jitpakdee K, Kerr S, Limthongkul W, Kotheeranurak V, Singhatanadgige W

Objective: No consensus criteria have been established regarding ideal candidates for indirect decompression with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and contributing factors of indirect decompression failure were rarely reported. We...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Is Direct Decompression Necessary for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)? A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Direct and Indirect Decompression With LLIF in Selected Patients

Limthongkul W, Thanapura C, Jitpakdee K, Praisarnti P, Kotheeranurak V, Yingsakmongkol W, Tanasansomboon T, Singhatanadgige W

Objective: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) between direct and indirect decompression in the treatment of patients with degenerative lumbar diseases. Methods: Patients who...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Analgesic Effect of Intravenous Nefopam for Postoperative Pain in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study

Chalermkitpanit P, Limthongkul W, Yingsakmongkol W, Thepsoparn M, Pannangpetch P, Tangchitcharoen N, Tanasansomboon T, Singhatanadgige W

Study Design: Randomized double-blind control study. Purpose: To evaluate the effects of nefopam on reducing morphine consumption and postoperative pain in patients undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and to evaluate...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Clinical and Radiographic Comparisons among Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison with Three-Way Matching

Yingsakmongkol W, Jitpakdee K, Varakornpipat P, Choentrakool C, Tanasansomboon T, Limthongkul W, Singhatanadgige W, Kotheeranurak V

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Purpose: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes among minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF), and oblique lateral lumbar interbody...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close
Perioperative Intravenous Nefopam on Pain Management and Ambulation after Open Spine Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study

Chalermkitpanit P, Yingsakmongkol W, Limthongkul W, Tanasansomboon T, Pannangpetch P, Tangchitcharoen N, Singhatanadgige W

Study Design: This was a randomized double-blind controlled study. Purpose: This study was designed to evaluate the effects of intravenous nefopam regarding its ability to reduce morphine consumption and postoperative pain...
CITED
export Copy
Close
SHARE
Twitter Facebook
Close

Go to Top

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr