Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2025 May;68(3):175-185. 10.5468/ogs.24234.

Clinical practice in office hysteroscopy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
  • 4Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
  • 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangneung Asan Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung, Korea
  • 8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Choisang Clinic for Women, Seoul, Korea
  • 9Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea
  • 10Hysteroscopy Committee of The Korean Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy (KSGE), Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Hysteroscopy is particularly valuable for the diagnosis of uterine cavity abnormalities through direct visualization. The development of office hysteroscopy has expanded the range of diagnostic and surgical procedures available. These detailed guidelines include patient counseling and the selection and setting of office hysteroscopy, including room, equipment, and medical staff. Analgesia or local anesthesia is often required in selective office hysteroscopy cases. Cervical dilation and preparation using medical or mechanical methods are required for most diagnostic hysteroscopic procedures. Methods for optimizing visualization and choosing suitable distension media are important for a successful office hysteroscopy. It is crucial to adhere to guidelines to prevent complications, such as vasovagal syncope, cervical trauma, uterine perforation, fluid overload, and embolism. Vaginoscopy can be a good alternative option for alleviating pain, especially in cases where the insertion of a vaginal speculum is expected to be challenging.

Keyword

Hysteroscopy; Cervix; Uterine perforation; Media

Reference

References

1. The use of hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of intrauterine pathology: ACOG committee opinion, number 800. Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135:e138–48.
2. Isaacson K. Office hysteroscopy: a valuable but under-utilized technique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 14:381–5.
Article
3. Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office operative hysteroscopy: an update. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018; 25:199–208.
Article
4. Orlando MS, Bradley LD. Implementation of office hysteroscopy for the evaluation and treatment of intrauterine pathology. Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 140:499–513.
Article
5. Chiofalo B, Palmara V, Vilos GA, Pacheco LA, Lasmar RB, Shawki O, et al. Reproductive outcomes of infertile women undergoing “see and treat” office hysteroscopy: a retrospective observational study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2021; 30:147–53.
Article
6. Campo R, Molinas CR, Rombauts L, Mestdagh G, Lauwers M, Braekmans P, et al. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod. 2005; 20:258–63.
Article
7. De Angelis C, Santoro G, Re ME, Nofroni I. Office hysteroscopy and compliance: mini-hysteroscopy versus traditional hysteroscopy in a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18:2441–5.
Article
8. Giorda G, Scarabelli C, Franceschi S, Campagnutta E. Feasibility and pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79:593–7.
Article
9. Rullo S, Sorrenti G, Marziali M, Ermini B, Sesti F, Piccione E. Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy. J Reprod Med. 2005; 50:45–8.
10. De Silva PM, Smith PP, Cooper NAM, Clark TJ. Outpatient hysteroscopy: (green-top guideline no. 59). BJOG. 2024; 131:e86–110.
11. Baxter AJ, Beck B, Phillips K. A randomized prospective trial of rigid and flexible hysteroscopy in an outpatient setting. Gynaecol Endosc. 2002; 11:357–64.
Article
12. Unfried G, Wieser F, Albrecht A, Kaider A, Nagele F. Flexible versus rigid endoscopes for outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16:168–71.
Article
13. Grow DR, Iromloo K. Oral contraceptives maintain a very thin endometrium before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85:204–7.
Article
14. Ciebiera M, Zgliczyńska M, Zgliczyński S, Sierant A, Laganà AS, Alonso Pacheco L, et al. Oral desogestrel as endometrial preparation before operative hysteroscopy: a systematic review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021; 86:209–17.
Article
15. Cicinelli E, Pinto V, Quattromini P, Fucci MR, Lepera A, Mitola PC, et al. Endometrial preparation with estradiol plus dienogest (Qlaira) for office hysteroscopic polypectomy: randomized pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19:356–9.
Article
16. Kodama M, Onoue M, Otsuka H, Yada-Hashimoto N, Saeki N, Kodama T, et al. Efficacy of dienogest in thinning the endometrium before hysteroscopic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20:790–5.
Article
17. Rai VS, Gillmer MD, Gray W. Is endometrial pretreatment of value in improving the outcome of transcervical resection of the endometrium? Hum Reprod. 2000; 15:1989–92.
Article
18. Deffieux X, Gauthier T, Menager N, Legendre G, Agostini A, Pierre F. Hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 178:114–22.
Article
19. Florio P, Puzzutiello R, Filippeschi M, D’Onofrio P, Mereu L, Morelli R, et al. Low-dose spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine with intrathecal fentanyl for operative hysteroscopy: a case series study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19:107–12.
Article
20. Majholm B, Bartholdy J, Clausen HV, Virkus RA, Engbæk J, Møller AM. Comparison between local anaesthesia with remifentanil and total intravenous anaesthesia for operative hysteroscopic procedures in day surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2012; 108:245–53.
Article
21. Hua Y, Zhang W, Hu X, Yang A, Zhu X. The use of misoprostol for cervical priming prior to hysteroscopy: a systematic review and analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016; 10:2789–801.
22. Polyzos NP, Zavos A, Valachis A, Dragamestianos C, Blockeel C, Stoop D, et al. Misoprostol prior to hysteroscopy in premenopausal and post-menopausal women. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18:393–404.
Article
23. Gkrozou F, Koliopoulos G, Vrekoussis T, Valasoulis G, Lavasidis L, Navrozoglou I, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing misoprostol versus placebo for cervical ripening prior to hysteroscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 158:17–23.
Article
24. Al-Fozan H, Firwana B, Al Kadri H, Hassan S, Tulandi T. Preoperative ripening of the cervix before operative hysteroscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015:CD005998.
Article
25. Bastu E, Celik C, Nehir A, Dogan M, Yuksel B, Ergun B. Cervical priming before diagnostic operative hysteroscopy in infertile women: a randomized, double-blind, controlled comparison of 2 vaginal misoprostol doses. Int Surg. 2013; 98:140–4.
Article
26. El-Mazny A, Abou-Salem N. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol for cervical priming before outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96:962–5.
Article
27. Issat T, Beta J, Nowicka MA, Maciejewski T, Jakimiuk AJ. A randomized, single blind, placebo-controlled trial for the pain reduction during the outpatient hysteroscopy after ketoprofen or intravaginal misoprostol. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21:921–7.
Article
28. Casadei L, Piccolo E, Manicuti C, Cardinale S, Collamarini M, Piccione E. Role of vaginal estradiol pretreatment combined with vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before operative hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016; 59:220–6.
Article
29. Oppegaard KS, Lieng M, Berg A, Istre O, Qvigstad E, Nesheim BI. A combination of misoprostol and estradiol for preoperative cervical ripening in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2010; 117:53–61.
Article
30. Nada AM, Elzayat AR, Awad MH, Metwally AA, Taher AM, Ogila AI, et al. Cervical priming by vaginal or oral misoprostol before operative hysteroscopy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23:1107–12.
Article
31. Lin YH, Hwang JL, Seow KM, Huang LW, Chen HJ, Hsieh BC. Laminaria tent vs misoprostol for cervical priming before hysteroscopy: randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009; 16:708–12.
Article
32. Phillips DR, Nathanson HG, Milim SJ, Haselkorn JS, Khapra A, Ross PL. The effect of dilute vasopressin solution on blood loss during operative hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88:761–6.
Article
33. Nezhat F, Admon D, Nezhat CH, Dicorpo JE, Nezhat C. Life-threatening hypotension after vasopressin injection during operative laparoscopy, followed by uneventful repeat laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994; 2:83–6.
Article
34. Hobo R, Netsu S, Koyasu Y, Tsutsumi O. Bradycardia and cardiac arrest caused by intramyometrial injection of vasopressin during a laparoscopically assisted myomectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113:484–6.
Article
35. Sharma M, Taylor A, di Spiezio Sardo A, Buck L, Mastrogamvrakis G, Kosmas I, et al. Outpatient hysteroscopy: traditional versus the ‘no-touch’ technique. BJOG. 2005; 112:963–7.
Article
36. Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. A systematic review of the effect of the distension medium on pain during outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95:264–71.
Article
37. Brusco GF, Arena S, Angelini A. Use of carbon dioxide versus normal saline for diagnostic hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2003; 79:993–7.
Article
38. Litta P, Bonora M, Pozzan C, Merlin F, Sacco G, Fracas M, et al. Carbon dioxide versus normal saline in outpatient hysteroscopy. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18:2446–9.
Article
39. Nagele F, Bournas N, O’Connor H, Broadbent M, Richardson R, Magos A. Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distension in outpatient hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65:305–9.
Article
40. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology, number 4, August 2005: hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106:439–42.
41. Loffer FD, Bradley LD, Brill AI, Brooks PG, Cooper JM. Hysteroscopic fluid monitoring guidelines. The ad hoc committee on hysteroscopic training guidelines of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000; 7:167–8.
42. Hahn RG. Fluid absorption in endoscopic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96:8–20.
Article
43. Phillips AJ. Peritonitis from sorbitol distending medium after hysteroscopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102:1148–9.
Article
44. Groenman FA, Peters LW, Rademaker BM, Bakkum EA. Embolism of air and gas in hysteroscopic procedures: pathophysiology and implication for daily practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15:241–7.
Article
45. Shankar M, Davidson A, Taub N, Habiba M. Randomised comparison of distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy. BJOG. 2004; 111:57–62.
Article
46. Ngu SF, Cheung VY, Pun TC. Randomized study of vaginoscopy and H pipelle vs traditional hysteroscopy and standard Pipelle. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012; 19:206–11.
47. Sagiv R, Sadan O, Boaz M, Dishi M, Schechter E, Golan A. A new approach to office hysteroscopy compared with traditional hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108:387–92.
48. Garbin O, Kutnahorsky R, Göllner JL, Vayssiere C. Vaginoscopic versus conventional approaches to outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopy: a two-centre randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21:2996–3000.
Article
49. Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG. 2010; 117:532–9.
Article
50. Almeida ZMMCD, Pontes R, Costa HDLFF. Evaluation of pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy by vaginoscopy using normal saline at body temperature as distension medium: a randomized controlled trial. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008; 30:25–30.
Article
51. De Silva PM, Carnegy A, Smith PP, Clark TJ. Vaginoscopy for office hysteroscopy: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 252:278–85.
Article
52. Bakour SH, Jones SE, O’Donovan P. Ambulatory hysteroscopy: evidence-based guide to diagnosis and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 20:953–75.
Article
53. Rodriguez S, Haimovich S, Vitale SG, Alonso L, Carugno J. Vasovagal syncope during office hysteroscopy-A frequently overlooked unpleasant complication. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022; 58:1626.
Article
54. Bettocchi S, Selvaggi L. A vaginoscopic approach to reduce the pain of office hysteroscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1997; 4:255–8.
Article
55. Aydeniz B, Gruber IV, Schauf B, Kurek R, Meyer A, Wallwiener D. A multicenter survey of complications associated with 21,676 operative hysteroscopies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 104:160–4.
56. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Best practice in outpatient hysteroscopy [Internet]. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists;c2011. [cited 2011 Mar]. Available from: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.rcog.org.uk/media/5llizces/gtg59hysteroscopy.pdf.
57. Agostini A, Cravello L, Bretelle F, Shojai R, Roger V, Blanc B. Risk of uterine perforation during hysteroscopic surgery. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002; 9:264–7.
Article
58. Istre O. Managing bleeding, fluid absorption and uterine perforation at hysteroscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 23:619–29.
Article
59. Hameed N, Suresh Kumar S. Glycine-induced hypoosmolar hyponatremia and hyperammonemia: a case report of operative hysteroscopy intravascular absorption (OHIA) syndrome. Cureus. 2024; 16:e70176.
Article
60. Aas-Eng MK, Langebrekke A, Hudelist G. Complications in operative hysteroscopy - is prevention possible? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96:1399–403.
Article
61. Luthra N, Grewal A. Air embolism following hysteroscopy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019; 35:416–7.
Article
62. Storm BS, Andreasen S, Hovland A, Nielsen EW. Gas embolism during hysteroscopic surgery?: three cases and a literature review. A A Case Rep. 2017; 9:140–3.
63. Verma A, Singh MP. Venous gas embolism in operative hysteroscopy: a devastating complication in a relatively simple surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018; 34:103–6.
Article
64. Diwakar L, Roberts TE, Cooper NA, Middleton L, Jowett S, Daniels J, et al. An economic evaluation of outpatient versus inpatient polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG. 2016; 123:625–31.
Article
65. Cooper NA, Clark TJ, Middleton L, Diwakar L, Smith P, Denny E, et al. Outpatient versus inpatient uterine polyp treatment for abnormal uterine bleeding: randomised controlled non-inferiority study. BMJ. 2015; 350:h1398.
Article
66. Luerti M, Vitagliano A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Angioni S, Garuti G, De Angelis C. Effectiveness of hysteroscopic techniques for endometrial polyp removal: the Italian multicenter Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019; 26:1169–76.
Article
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2025 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr