Ewha Med J.  2025 Jan;48(1):e2. 10.12771/emj.2025.e2.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation program at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Korea

• Han SJ
• Suh JH

• KMID: 2567549
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2025.e2

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation program at Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Korea that was designed to augment respiratory function, promote patient recovery, and improve discharge outcomes.

Methods: This study was conducted as part of quality improvement activities from March to August 2023. A multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation team was established, comprising specialists in rehabilitation medicine, pulmonology, and thoracic surgery, as well as physical and occupational therapists, and the nutrition team. We developed a comprehensive rehabilitation program that included stretching, strengthening exercises, aerobic training, and respiratory retraining, supplemented by individualized treatments such as bedside and ambulatory physical therapy. Evaluations before and after rehabilitation were performed using the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test. The primary indicators of success were an increase of over 10% in pulmonary rehabilitation consultations and an improvement in discharge-to-home rates.

Results: The total number of pulmonary rehabilitation cases rose by 79.16%, from 24 to 43, while consultations saw a 21.15% increase, from 52 to 63. Of the 63 pulmonary rehabilitation cases, 32 (50.8%) were transferred to other hospitals, 25 (39.7%) were discharged home, and 6 (9.5%) remained hospitalized.

Conclusion: The study demonstrated the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary pulmonary rehabilitation approach in improving program participation and achieving meaningful discharge outcomes. These findings underscore the potential for expanding multidisciplinary efforts and highlight the need for further studies to increase discharge-to-home rates and evaluate the long-term impacts of such programs.

Keyword

Occupational therapists; Physical therapists; Physical therapy modalities; Pulmonary medicine; Quality improvement

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. The number of pulmonary rehabilitation consultations and the number of bedside and ambulatory pulmonary rehabilitation cases. PT, physical therapy; QI, quality improvement.

Reference

References

1. Foster S, Thomas HM 3rd. Pulmonary rehabilitation in lung disease other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990; 141(3):601–604. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/141.3.601. PMID: 2310092.

2. Holland AE, Wadell K, Spruit MA. How to adapt the pulmonary rehabilitation programme to patients with chronic respiratory disease other than COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2013; 22(130):577–586. DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00005613. PMID: 24293474. PMCID: PMC9639174.

3. Rokach A, Romem A, Arish N, Azulai H, Chen C, Bertisch M, et al. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on non-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Isr Med Assoc J. 2019; 21(5):326–329.

4. Brooks D, Sottana R, Bell B, Hanna M, Laframboise L, Selvanayagarajah S, et al. Characterization of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in Canada in 2005. Can Respir J. 2007; 14(2):87–92. DOI: 10.1155/2007/951498. PMID: 17372635. PMCID: PMC2676378.

5. Yohannes AM, Connolly MJ. Pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in the UK: a national representative survey. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18(4):444–449. DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr736oa. PMID: 15180129.

6. Garvey C, Casaburi R, Spruit MA, De Brandt J. Survey of exercise prescription in US pulmonary rehabilitation programs. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2020; 40(2):116–119. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000467. PMID: 32118657.

7. Johnston CL, Maxwell LJ, Alison JA. Pulmonary rehabilitation in Australia: a national survey. Physiotherapy. 2011; 97(4):284–290. DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.12.001. PMID: 22051584.

8. Bickford LS, Hodgkin JE, McInturff SL. National pulmonary rehabilitation survey. Update. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1995; 15(6):406–411. DOI: 10.1097/00008483-199511000-00002. PMID: 8624965.

9. Lee YS, Park YB, Oh YM, Lee SD. Survey on the reality of pulmonary rehabilitation in Korea. Obstr Lung Dis. 2013; (1):4–7.

10. Kim HJ, Choi HE, Jang HJ, Kim HK, Park JH, Lee JH, et al. Current status and trends of pulmonary rehabilitation in South Korea: national level data analysis using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database from 2016 to 2018. Medicine. 2022; 101(41):e31085. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031085. PMID: 36254088. PMCID: PMC9575737.

11. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 5(9):691–706. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(17)30293-X. PMID: 28822787.

12. Cho KS. Current status of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the Republic of Korea. Public Health Wkly Rep. 2021; 14(16):943–951.

13. Osadnik CR, Singh S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for obstructive lung disease. Respirology. 2019; 24(9):871–878. DOI: 10.1111/resp.13569. PMID: 31038835.

14. Shin HI, Oh IH, Kim DA, Kim TW, Kim HB, You SD, et al. Evaluation of the effects and improvement plans for the phase 2 pilot program of rehabilitation medical institution fees. Wonju: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA);2022.