J Audiol Otol.  2024 Apr;28(2):146-152. 10.7874/jao.2023.00269.

Comparison of Two Clinical Devices for the Measurement of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Adults

Affiliations
  • 1Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
  • 2Interacoustics A/S, Middelfart, Denmark
  • 3Institute of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • 4Research Unit for ORL-Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Background and Objectives
Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are low-intensity sounds generated by the cochlea and associated with the function of the outer hair cells. Since OAE measurements do not require active participation of a listener, OAEs are considered an objective measure of cochlear function. While distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs) are commonly used in clinical practice, limited information is available on the performance of various clinical devices. This study compared two commercial clinical devices, Titan and Eclipse from Interacoustics, and collected normative data for DPOAEs in people with normal hearing. The data collection and analysis were focused on signal and noise amplitudes as well as signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
Subjects and Methods
Sixty-three participants with normal hearing (age 23.2±2.0 years) were included in the study. DPOAEs were measured at 31 frequencies ranging from 500 to 10,000 Hz.
Results
DPOAE amplitude differed across frequencies. Additionally, a high number of unreliable responses were observed at the edge frequencies (<828 Hz and >6,072 Hz). There were no significant differences between the two devices in terms of DPOAE amplitudes, but the recorded-noise levels (amplitude) differed significantly. SNRs of the recorded OAEs were frequency dependent (higher frequencies showed larger SNRs), and significant differences in terms of SNR were found between the two devices.
Conclusions
Despite the above-mentioned differences, the OAEs recorded with both devices met the pass criteria for the SNR (≥6 dB) consistently across frequencies, and thus the differences do not compromise the test outcomes. The frequency dependence of the OAE amplitudes and the corresponding SNRs may be relevant for clinical practice.

Keyword

Otoacoustic emissions; Distortion-product otoacoustic emission; Normal hearing; Outer hearing cells; Hearing loss
Full Text Links
  • JAO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr