Diabetes Metab J.  2024 Mar;48(2):253-264. 10.4093/dmj.2023.0128.

Two-Year Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Initial Triple Combination of Metformin, Sitagliptin, and Empagliflozin in Drug-Naïve Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea

Abstract

Background
We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of initial triple therapy using metformin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods
We enrolled 170 drug-naïve patients with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level >7.5% who had started triple therapy (metformin, sitagliptin, and empagliflozin). Glycemic, metabolic, and urinary parameters were measured for 24 months.
Results
After 24 months, HbA1c level decreased significantly from 11.0%±1.8% to 7.0%±1.7%. At 12 and 24 months, the rates of achievement of the glycemic target goal (HbA1c <7.0%) were 72.5% and 61.7%, respectively, and homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function and insulin resistance indices improved. Whole-body fat percentage decreased by 1.08%, and whole-body muscle percentage increased by 0.97% after 24 months. Fatty liver indices and albuminuria improved significantly. The concentration of ketone bodies was elevated at the baseline but decreased after 24 months. There were no serious adverse events, including ketoacidosis.
Conclusion
Initial triple combination therapy with metformin, sitagliptin, and empagliflozin led to achievement of the glycemic target goal, which was maintained for 24 months without severe hypoglycemia but with improved metabolic function and albuminuria. This combination therapy may be a good strategy for drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Keyword

Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV inhibitors; Glycated hemoglobin; Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Parameters related to glycemic control over the 24 months. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. (A) Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. (B) Fasting plasma glucose concentration. (C) Postload 2-hour glucose levels. (D) Fasting insulin levels. (E) Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). (F) Homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β). aP<0.05: paired t-test between the baseline and after treatment.

  • Fig. 2. Body weight, body mass index (BMI), muscle mass, fat mass, and muscle and fat percentages over the 24 months. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. (A) Body weight. (B) BMI. (C) Total muscle and fat mass. (E) Total muscle and fat percentages. aP<0.05: paired t-test between the values recorded at the baseline and after treatment.

  • Fig. 3. Changes in the concentrations of ketone bodies, glucagon, and free fatty acids over the 24 months. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. Logarithmically transformed values were used for comparisons of the concentrations of fasting glucagon, total ketone bodies, β-hydroxybutyrate, and acetoacetate. (A) Total ketone bodies. (B) β-Hydroxybutyrate. (C) Acetoacetate. (D) Glucagon. (E) Free fatty acids. aP<0.05: paired t-test between the values recorded at the baseline and after treatment.

  • Fig. 4. Renal and liver functional indexes over the 24 months. Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. (A) Serum creatinine (Cr) concentration. (B) Estimated glomerular filtration rate by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (eGFR-CKD-EPI). (C) Urinary protein/Cr and urinary albumin/Cr ratios at 0, 12, and 24 months. (D) Aspartate aminotransferase (AST). (E) Alanine aminotransferase (ALT). (F) Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) based on the NAFLD fatty liver score at 0, 12, and 24 months. aP<0.05: paired t-test between the values recorded at the baseline and after treatment.


Reference

1. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group, Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Bigger JT, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:2545–59.
Article
2. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-Year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359:1577–89.
Article
3. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:580–91.
Article
4. Juarez DT, Ma C, Kumasaka A, Shimada R, Davis J. Failure to reach target glycated a1c levels among patients with diabetes who are adherent to their antidiabetic medication. Popul Health Manag. 2014; 17:218–23.
Article
5. Cersosimo E, Johnson EL, Chovanes C, Skolnik N. Initiating therapy in patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: combination therapy vs a stepwise approach. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20:497–507.
Article
6. Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, Diamant M, Ferrannini E, Nauck M, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2015: a patient-centred approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia. 2015; 58:429–42.
Article
7. Zinman B. Initial combination therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus: is it ready for prime time? Am J Med. 2011; 124(1 Suppl):S19–34.
Article
8. Cahn A, Cefalu WT. Clinical considerations for use of initial combination therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39(Suppl 2):S137–45.
Article
9. Phung OJ, Sobieraj DM, Engel SS, Rajpathak SN. Early combination therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16:410–7.
Article
10. Wu D, Li L, Liu C. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and metformin as initial combination therapy and as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014; 16:30–7.
Article
11. Matthews DR, Paldanius PM, Proot P, Chiang Y, Stumvoll M, Del Prato S, et al. Glycaemic durability of an early combination therapy with vildagliptin and metformin versus sequential metformin monotherapy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (VERIFY): a 5-year, multicentre, randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2019; 394:1519–29.
Article
12. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018; 41:2669–701.
Article
13. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022; 45(Suppl 1):S125–43.
14. Ko SH, Hur KY, Rhee SY, Kim NH, Moon MK, Park SO, et al. Antihyperglycemic agent therapy for adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 2017: a position statement of the Korean Diabetes Association. Diabetes Metab J. 2017; 41:337–48.
Article
15. Abdul-Ghani MA, Puckett C, Triplitt C, Maggs D, Adams J, Cersosimo E, et al. Initial combination therapy with metformin, pioglitazone and exenatide is more effective than sequential add-on therapy in subjects with new-onset diabetes: results from the Efficacy and Durability of Initial Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes (EDICT): a randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015; 17:268–75.
16. Lim S, Ku EJ, Lee SY, Lee JH, Lee JE, Kim KM, et al. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of initial triple combination of metformin, sitagliptin, and lobeglitazone in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: initial triple study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020; 8:e000807.
17. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, Steg PG, Davidson J, Hirshberg B, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:1317–26.
Article
18. Pratley RE, Eldor R, Raji A, Golm G, Huyck SB, Qiu Y, et al. Ertugliflozin plus sitagliptin versus either individual agent over 52 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin: the VERTIS FACTORIAL randomized trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20:1111–20.
19. Lim S, Sohn M, Shin Y, Ferrannini E. Initial combination of metformin, sitagliptin, and empagliflozin in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: safety and metabolic effects. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022; 24:757–62.
20. Ji L, Chan JC, Yu M, Yoon KH, Kim SG, Choi SH, et al. Early combination versus initial metformin monotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: an East Asian perspective. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021; 23:3–17.
21. Wu Q, Liu M, Fang Z, Li C, Zou F, Hu L, et al. Efficacy and safety of empagliflozin at different doses in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022; 47:270–86.
Article
22. Ozcelik S, Celik M, Vural A, Aydin B. The effect of low and high dose empagliflozin on HbA1c and lipid profile in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a real-world data. North Clin Istanb. 2019; 7:167–73.
23. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985; 28:412–9.
Article
24. Jeong S, Kim K, Chang J, Choi S, Kim SM, Son JS, et al. Development of a simple nonalcoholic fatty liver disease scoring system indicative of metabolic risks and insulin resistance. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8:1414.
Article
25. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001; 285:2486–97.
26. Kim BY, Kang SM, Kang JH, Kang SY, Kim KK, Kim KB, et al. 2020 Korean Society for the Study of Obesity guidelines for the management of obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021; 30:81–92.
Article
27. Hou X, Liu J, Song J, Wang C, Liang K, Sun Y, et al. Relationship of hemoglobin A1c with β cell function and insulin resistance in newly diagnosed and drug naive type 2 diabetes patients. J Diabetes Res. 2016; 2016:8797316.
28. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. JAMA. 1999; 281:2005–12.
Article
29. Polidori D, Iijima H, Goda M, Maruyama N, Inagaki N, Crawford PA. Intra- and inter-subject variability for increases in serum ketone bodies in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with the sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor canagliflozin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018; 20:1321–6.
Article
30. Shin Y, Choi H, Lim S. Comparison betweeen dapagliflozin add-on therapy and insulin dose escalation in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes treated with insulin: DVI study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 175:108843.
Article
31. Omar B, Ahren B. Pleiotropic mechanisms for the glucose-lowering action of DPP-4 inhibitors. Diabetes. 2014; 63:2196–202.
Article
32. Szekeres Z, Toth K, Szabados E. The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on lipid metabolism. Metabolites. 2021; 11:87.
Article
33. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373:2117–28.
Article
34. Neuen BL, Young T, Heerspink HJ, Neal B, Perkovic V, Billot L, et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for the prevention of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019; 7:845–54.
Article
35. Warren B, Rebholz CM, Sang Y, Lee AK, Coresh J, Selvin E, et al. Diabetes and trajectories of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a prospective cohort analysis of the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41:1646–53.
Article
36. Hickman IJ, Macdonald GA. Impact of diabetes on the severity of liver disease. Am J Med. 2007; 120:829–34.
Article
37. Rhee EJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes: an epidemiological perspective. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2019; 34:226–33.
Article
38. Seino Y, Inagaki N, Haneda M, Kaku K, Sasaki T, Fukatsu A, et al. Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin added to various oral antidiabetic drugs in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2015; 6:443–53.
Article
39. Johansson L, Hockings PD, Johnsson E, Dronamraju N, Maaske J, Garcia-Sanchez R, et al. Dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin add-on to metformin reduces liver fat and adipose tissue volume in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020; 22:1094–101.
Article
40. Dharmalingam M, Yamasandhi PG. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 22:421–8.
Article
41. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group, Nathan DM, Genuth S, Lachin J, Cleary P, Crofford O, et al. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:977–86.
Article
42. Rea F, Ciardullo S, Savare L, Perseghin G, Corrao G. Comparing medication persistence among patients with type 2 diabetes using sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in real-world setting. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021; 180:109035.
Article
43. McInnes N, Hall S, Sultan F, Aronson R, Hramiak I, Harris S, et al. Remission of type 2 diabetes following a short-term intervention with insulin glargine, metformin, and dapagliflozin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105:dgaa248.
Article
Full Text Links
  • DMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr