J Gynecol Oncol.  2023 Jan;34(1):e10. 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e10.

Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
  • 3Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
  • 4Palliative Care Center, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan
  • 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • 6Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
  • 7Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan

Abstract


Objective
This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)’ perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care.
Methods
We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We analyzed the proactiveness of the participants toward addressing 25 survivor issues. In addition, the practice patterns and barriers to care for survivors’ long-term health issues, such as second primary cancer (SPC) and lifestyle-related diseases (LSRD), and return-to-work (RTW) support were assessed.
Results
We received 313 responses. The respondents had a mean of 22 years of physician experience. The ratio of men to women was approximately 7:3, and 84.7% worked at facilities for multidisciplinary cancer treatment. The respondents’ proactiveness for addressing psychosocial problems was significantly lower than physical and gynecological issues (p<0.01 by χ2 test). However, most GOs tried to contribute to such issues according to patients’ demands. Women GOs were more proactively involved in some survivorship issues than the men (p<0.05 by logistic regression analysis). The rates of the respondents who proactively discussed SPC, LSRD, and RTW were unexpectedly high (60.7%, 36.1%, and 52.4%, respectively). However, the GOs only provided verbal support for these issues in many cases.
Conclusion
The Japanese GOs were enthusiastic about survivorship care. However, their tendency to deal with survivors’ problems through their own knowledge and judgments raises concerns about the quality of care. Therefore, creating survivorship care guidelines and enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration should be prioritized.

Keyword

Cancer Survivorship; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Oncologists; Practice Patterns, Physicians’; Surveys and Questionnaires
Full Text Links
  • JGO
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr