Ann Lab Med.  2023 Nov;43(6):574-584. 10.3343/alm.2023.43.6.574.

Comparison of the New VITEK MS PRIME System with the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Biotyper Microflex LT for the Identification of Microorganisms

• Grohs P
• Remaud E
• Lath C
• Vuong K
• Parolini ML
• Dannaoui E
• Podglajen I

• KMID: 2552031
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.6.574

Abstract

Background
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) is the cornerstone of bacterial identification. The performance of a new MALDI time-of-flight mass spectrometry VITEK MS PRIME (VMS-P) system was compared with that of the MALDI Biotyper Microflex LT (MBT) system, which is routinely used in our laboratory.
Methods
Sixteen bacterial and yeast reference strains cultured in 20 different media were analyzed over 10 consecutive rounds using both systems. Bacterial and yeast isolates from the routine workflow were processed using both systems. Microcolonies were identified after a 4-hour agar subculture from positive blood culture bottles, without extraction.
Results
To determine the repeatability based on the reference strains, 1,190 spots were processed using each system. Correct identification was achieved for 94.0% (MBT) and 98.4% (VMS-P; P<0.01) of spots. Among these, 83.0% (MBT) and 100.0% (VMS-P) were identified with a high degree of confidence. For 1,214 spots from routine isolates, species identification was achieved for 90.0% (MBT) and 91.4% (VMS-P; P=0.26) of spots. For 69.8% (MBT) and 87.4% (VMS-P) of the spots, identification was achieved with a high degree-of-confidence score. When identification was performed using both systems, the agreement between them was 97.9%. The identification of microcolonies from positive blood culture bottles was achieved for 55.5% (MBT) and 70.2% (VMS-P; P=0.01) of spots.
Conclusions
The MBT and VMS-P systems perform similarly in routine daily practice. The new VMS-P system shows high repeatability, better confidence scores for identification, and promising ability to identify microcolonies.

Keyword

Blood culture; Microbiology; Spectrometry; Mass; Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization

Reference

1. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B, Fournier PE, Rolain JM, et al. 2009; Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis. 49:543–51. DOI: 10.1086/600885. PMID: 19583519.

2. Chen XF, Hou X, Xiao M, Zhang L, Cheng JW, Zhou ML, et al. 2021; Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) analysis for the identification of pathogenic microorganisms: a review. Microorganisms. 9:1536. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9071536. PMID: 34361971. PMCID: PMC8304613.

3. Robert MG, Cornet M, Hennebique A, Rasamoelina T, Caspar Y, Pondérand L, et al. 2021; MALDI-TOF MS in a medical mycology laboratory: on stage and backstage. Microorganisms. 9:1283. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9061283. PMID: 34204665. PMCID: PMC8231132.

4. Idelevich EA, Seifert H, Sundqvist M, Scudeller L, Amit S, Balode A, et al. 2019; Microbiological diagnostics of bloodstream infections in Europe-an ESGBIES survey. Clin Microbiol Infect. 25:1399–407. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.03.024. PMID: 30980927.

5. Nomura F, Tsuchida S, Murata S, Satoh M, Matsushita K. 2020; Mass spectrometry-based microbiological testing for blood stream infection. Clin Proteomics. 17:14. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-020-09278-7. PMID: 32435163. PMCID: PMC7222329.

6. Lamy B, Sundqvist M, Idelevich EA. ESCMID Study Group for Bloodstream Infections, Endocarditis and Sepsis (ESGBIES). 2020; Bloodstream infections - standard and progress in pathogen diagnostics. Clin Microbiol Infect. 26:142–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.017. PMID: 31760113.

7. Porte L, García P, Braun S, Ulloa MT, Lafourcade M, Montaña A, et al. 2017; Head-to-head comparison of Microflex LT and Vitek MS systems for routine identification of microorganisms by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in Chile. PLOS ONE. 12:e0177929. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177929. PMID: 28542393. PMCID: PMC5436840.

8. Bilecen K, Yaman G, Ciftci U, Laleli YR. 2015; Performances and reliability of Bruker Microflex LT and VITEK MS MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry systems for the identification of clinical microorganisms. BioMed Res Int. 2015:516410. DOI: 10.1155/2015/516410. PMID: 26793718. PMCID: PMC4697076.

9. Deak E, Charlton CL, Bobenchik AM, Miller SA, Pollett S, McHardy IH, et al. 2015; Comparison of the Vitek MS and Bruker Microflex LT MALDI-TOF MS platforms for routine identification of commonly isolated bacteria and yeast in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 81:27–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.018. PMID: 25446889.

10. Resource Center BioMérieux. https://resourcecenter.biomerieux.com/search/vitek%20ms%20prime. Updated on May 2023.

11. Verroken A, Defourny L, Lechgar L, Magnette A, Delmée M, Glupczynski Y. 2015; Reducing time to identification of positive blood cultures with MALDI-TOF MS analysis after a 5-h subculture. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 34:405–13. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2242-4. PMID: 25252627.

12. Bardelli M, Padovani M, Fiorentini S, Caruso A, Yamamura D, Gaskin M, et al. 2022; A side-by-side comparison of the performance and time-and-motion data of VITEK MS. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 41:1115–25. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-022-04472-x. PMID: 35841452.

13. French K, Evans J, Tanner H, Gossain S, Hussain A. 2016; The clinical impact of rapid, direct MALDI-ToF identification of bacteria from positive blood cultures. PLOS ONE. 11:e0169332. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169332. PMID: 28036369. PMCID: PMC5201237.

14. Chen JHK, Ho PL, Kwan GSW, She KKK, Siu GKH, Cheng VCC, et al. 2013; Direct bacterial identification in positive blood cultures by use of two commercial matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. J Clin Microbiol. 51:1733–9. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.03259-12. PMID: 23515548. PMCID: PMC3716069.