Korean J Women Health Nurs.  2023 Dec;29(4):263-273. 10.4069/kjwhn.2023.11.13.

A comparison of the perceived importance and performance of midwives’ roles between midwives and nurses in Korea: a cross-sectional study

• Kim K
• Kim Y
• Park J

• KMID: 2550991
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2023.11.13

Abstract

Purpose
This study aimed to identify the perceptions, importance, and performance of midwives’ roles among midwives and nurses in Korea. Methods: A descriptive correlational design was employed. Data were collected from 164 nurses and 79 midwives from April 1 to June 25, 2021. Midwives enrolled in the Korean Midwifery Association and nurses and midwives from two hospitals each Daegu and Gyeonggi Province in Korea were invited to participate. The independent t-test, chi-square test, the Welch-Aspin test, and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for analysis. Results: The midwives’ role perception score (3.47±1.46) was lower than that of nurses (3.95±0.85), and the midwives’ role performance score (2.98±0.83) was also lower than that of nurses (3.34±0.89). Significant differences were observed between midwives and nurses in their perception and performance of roles related to prenatal management, childbirth management, management of psychological changes, postpartum management, and newborn care. Higher role perception and performance among midwives were linked to the management of psychological changes and women’s health, indicating potential areas for future development. Conclusion: The study results suggest directions for developing new roles for midwives. It is necessary to find a way to expand the field of midwives in public health by benchmarking the roles of midwives in various countries.

Keyword

Nurses; Nurse midwives; Role; Perception; Work performance

Reference

References

1. Vital Statistics Division, Statistics Korea. Birth statistics 2022 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2022. [cited 2023 Oct 30]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a20108100000&bid=11773&act=view&list_no=427187.

2. Korean Statistics Information Service (KOSIS). Results of childbirth examination by type of nursing institution [Internet]. Daejeon: Author;2022. [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: https://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=354&tblId=DT_LEE_54&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=354_1_F&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1.

3. Korean Law Information Center. Medical Service Act. Law No. 19421 [Enforcement: 2023 Nov 20; Partial Amendment: 2023 May 19]. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Walfare;2020. [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from https://www.law.go.kr/LSW//lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%EC%9D%98%EB%A3%8C%EB%B2%95#undefined.

4. Lee KH, Kim KW. Core competency of basic practice of nurse-midwifery. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2003; 9(4):410–421. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2003.9.4.410.

5. Park JS, Kwon YE, Kim BM. The job experience of nurse midwives. Korean J Health Commun. 2017; 12(1):85–95. http://doi.org/10.15715/kjhcom.2017.12.1.85.

6. The Swedish Association of Midwives. The Swedish Midwifery report 2021: the midwife role in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN 2030 Agenda. Protect and invest together [Internet]. Stockholm: Author;2021. [cited 2022 Nov 17]. Available from: https://www.barnmorskeforbundet.se/english/.

7. Kennedy HP, Balaam MC, Dahlen H, Declercq E, de Jonge A, Downe S, et al. The role of midwifery and other international insights for maternity care in the United States: an analysis of four countries. Birth. 2020; 47(4):332–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12504.

8. Mattison CA, Lavis JN, Hutton EK, Dion ML, Wilson MG. Understanding the conditions that influence the roles of midwives in Ontario, Canada's health system: an embedded single-case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1):197. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-5033-x.

9. Song JY, Park YJ. Opening status of the Korea midwifery birthing centers and development of midwifery practice guideline. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020; 50(4):583–598. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.20032.

10. Kim B, Kang SJ. Comparison of professionalism and job satisfaction between Korean midwives in birthing centers and midwives in hospitals. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020; 26(3):222–230. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.09.08.

11. Jung GA, Kim MJ. Work performance and calling as factors influencing job satisfaction among nurse midwives working in the delivery room. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020; 26(1):10–18. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.02.27.

12. Kim YM. 2020 Year of the nurse and the midwife: a call for strengthening midwifery in response to South Korea's ultra-low birth rate. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020; 26(4):255–259. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.12.03.

13. Kim KW. Expanding the role of midwives in Korea. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021; 27(3):167–170. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.09.09.1.

14. Baek KH. The legal study of midwife’s legal status and attention-duty. Korean J Med Law. 2011; 19(1):61–84.

15. Yu YS. Role recognition, role performance and inhibitory factors of midwives working in midwifery clinics and hospital [master’s thesis]. Seoul: Hanyang University;2019. 87.

16. Kang NM, Park H, Lee SY, Kim OJ, Kim SJ, Moon GN, et al. Clinical practice protocol for the standardization of guidelines for Korean midwifery natural fertility management. Cult Exch Multicult Educ. 2020; 9(5):393–422. https://doi.org/10.30974/kaice.2020.9.5.16.

17. Mary S, Julie J, Jennifer G. Teaching evidence based practice and research through blended learning to undergraduate midwifery students from a practice based perspective. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014; 14(2):220–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2013.10.001.

18. Park C, Kim H, Yeoum S. Experiences of nursing college students attended to delivery practice at midwifery clinic. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2015; 21(2):115–127. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2015.21.2.115.

19. Vermeulen J, Luyben A, O'Connell R, Gillen P, Escuriet R, Fleming V. Failure or progress?: The current state of the professionalisation of midwifery in Europe. Eur J Midwifery. 2019; 3:22. https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/115038.

20. Park MR, Lee JY. Length of stay, health care cost, postpartum discomfort, and satisfaction with medical service in puerperas giving birth in midwifery clinic and hospitals. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2018; 24(1):24–32. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2018.24.1.24.

21. Kim B, Kang SJ. Comparison of professionalism and job satisfaction between Korean midwives in birthing centers and midwives in hospitals. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2020; 26(3):222–230. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2020.09.08.

22. Shin YS, Lee SH, Lee YH, Choi BH, Park JH, Kim EW, et al. Survey of health and medical personnel [Internet]. 192. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Health and Welfare & Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs;2022. [cited 2022 Nov 18]. Available from: https://www.prism.go.kr/homepage/entire/researchDetail.do?researchId=1351000-202200328.