J Korean Med Sci.  2023 Nov;38(45):e373. 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e373.

Plagiarism: A Bird’s Eye View

• Habibzadeh F

• KMID: 2547980
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e373

Abstract

Plagiarism is among the prevalent misconducts reported in scientific writing and common causes of article retraction in scholarly journals. Plagiarism of idea is not acceptable by any means. However, plagiarism of text is a matter of debate from culture to culture. Herein, I wish to reflect on a bird’s eye view of plagiarism, particularly plagiarism of text, in scientific writing. Text similarity score as a signal of text plagiarism is not an appropriate index and an expert should examine the similarity with enough scrutiny. Text recycling in certain instances might be acceptable in scientific writing provided that the authors could correctly construe the text piece they borrowed. With introduction of artificial intelligence-based units, which help authors to write their manuscripts, the incidence of text plagiarism might increase. However, after a while, when a universal artificial unit takes over, no one will need to worry about text plagiarism as the incentive to commit plagiarism will be abolished, I believe.

Keyword

Plagiarism; Ethics; Scientific Misconduct; Medical Writing; Publishing

Reference

1. Gupta L, Tariq J, Yessirkepov M, Zimba O, Misra DP, Agarwal V, et al. Plagiarism in Non-anglophone countries: a cross-sectional survey of researchers and journal editors. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(39):e247. PMID: 34636502.

2. US Office of Research Integrity. ORI policy on plagiarism. Accessed May 30, 2023. https://ori.hhs.gov/ori-policy-plagiarism .

3. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2021; 59(3):132–137. PMID: 34538939.

4. Vessal K, Habibzadeh F. Rules of the game of scientific writing: fair play and plagiarism. Lancet. 2007; 369(9562):641.

5. Glaze FE. Galen refashioned: Gariopontus in the later middle ages and renaissance. Furdell EL, editor. Textual Healing: Essays on Medieval and Early Modern Medicine. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill Academic Publishers;2005. p. 53–75.

6. Habibzadeh F, Marcovitch H. Plagiarism: the emperor’s new clothes. Eur Sci Ed. 2011; 37(3):67–69.

7. Habibzadeh F. Plagiarism: what does the future hold for science writing? Eur Sci Ed. 2014; 40(4):91–93.

8. Shashok K. How AuthorAID in the Eastern Mediterranean helps researchers become authors. Write Stuff. 2010; 19(1):43–46.

9. Habibzadeh F. The acceptable text similarity level in manuscripts submitted to scientific journals. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(31):e240. PMID: 37550808.

10. Habibzadeh FA, Winker M. Duplicate publication and plagiarism: causes and cures. Notf Rettmed. 2009; 12(6):415–418.

11. Rokni MB, Bizhani N, Habibzadeh F, Farhud DD, Mohammadi N, Alizadeh A, et al. Comprehensive survey of plagiarism in Iran. Pak J Med Sci. 2020; 36(7):1441–1448. PMID: 33235554.

12. Kleinert S. Checking for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and text recycling. Lancet. 2011; 377(9762):281–282.

13. Habibzadeh F, Shashok K. Plagiarism in scientific writing: words or ideas? Croat Med J. 2011; 52(4):576–577. PMID: 21853553.

14. Mehta P, Mukherjee S. Plagiarism and Its repercussions: a primer on responsible scientific writing. Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics. 2022; 3(1):52–62.

15. Park SH. Use of generative artificial intelligence, including large language models such as ChatGPT, in scientific publications: policies of KJR and prominent authorities. Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(8):715–718. PMID: 37500572.

16. Donker T. The dangers of using large language models for peer review. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023; 23(7):781.

17. Koga S. The integration of large language models such as ChatGPT in scientific writing: harnessing potential and addressing pitfalls. Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(9):924–925. PMID: 37634646.

18. Zielinski C, Winker MA, Aggarwal R, Ferris LE, Heinemann M, Lapeña JF, et al. Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts. WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications. Updated May 31, 2023. Accessed Jun 2, 2023. https://wame.org/page3.php?id=106 .

19. Habibzadeh F. GPTZero performance in identifying artificial intelligence-generated medical texts: a preliminary study. J Korean Med Sci. 2023; 38(38):e319. PMID: 37750374.

20. Habibzadeh F. The future of scientific journals: the rise of UniAI. Learn Publ. 2023; 36(2):326–330.