J Pathol Transl Med.  2023 Nov;57(6):289-304. 10.4132/jptm.2023.10.04.

The Asian Thyroid Working Group, from 2017 to 2023

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pathology, Cancer Genome Center and Thyroid Disease Center, Izumi City General Hospital, Izumi, Osaka, Japan
  • 2Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Pathology, Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
  • 4Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Cytology, Kuma Hospital, Kobe, Japan
  • 5Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Chiba, Japan
  • 6Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
  • 7Special Task Force for Activating Research (STAR), Department of Pathology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • 8Department of Cytology and Gynecological Pathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  • 9Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

The Asian Thyroid Working Group was founded in 2017 at the 12th Asia Oceania Thyroid Association (AOTA) Congress in Busan, Korea. This group activity aims to characterize Asian thyroid nodule practice and establish strict diagnostic criteria for thyroid carcinomas, a reporting system for thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology without the aid of gene panel tests, and new clinical guidelines appropriate to conservative Asian thyroid nodule practice based on scientific evidence obtained from Asian patient cohorts. Asian thyroid nodule practice is usually designed for patient-centered clinical practice, which is based on the Hippocratic Oath, “First do not harm patients,” and an oriental filial piety “Do not harm one’s own body because it is a precious gift from parents,” which is remote from defensive medical practice in the West where physicians, including pathologists, suffer from severe malpractice climate. Furthermore, Asian practice emphasizes the importance of resource management in navigating the overdiagnosis of low-risk thyroid carcinomas. This article summarizes the Asian Thyroid Working Group activities in the past 7 years, from 2017 to 2023, highlighting the diversity of thyroid nodule practice between Asia and the West and the background reasons why Asian clinicians and pathologists modified Western systems significantly.

Keyword

Asia; Thyroid neoplasms; Fine needle aspiration (FNA); Diagnostic criteria; Patient centered care; Active surveillance; Thyroidectomy

Figure

  • Fig. 1. NS from 0 to 3 in encapsulated follicular pattern tumors results in variable benign, borderline, or malignant diagnoses between Asian and Western pathologists. Four illustrations (NS 0–1, NS 1–2, NS 2–3, and NS 3 or more) in encapsulated follicular pattern tumors often result in diverse benign, borderline, or malignant diagnoses among pathologists [5-7]. The two illustrations on the left are FA when noninvasive or FTC when invasive in Asian thyroid practice because those extremely delicate nuclear features are insufficient for PTC-type malignancy. Most Western pathologists accept nuclear features in the three illustrations (NS 1–2, NS 2–3, and NS 3 or more) on the right as positive for PTC-N and call them using the same diagnostic terminology, PTC type nuclear features, regardless of different genetic backgrounds, BRAF or RAS oncogene lineages [1-3,21-23]. Some Asian pathologists distinguish nuclear features in the two illustrations (NS of 2–3 and NS of 3 or more) on the right, either RAS-like FV-PTC or BRAF-like conventional PTC [14,16,35]. NS, nuclear score defined by Nikiforov et al. [2,23]. NS, nuclear scoring; FA, follicular adenoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; NIFTP, noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillarylike nuclear features; PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; PTC-N, papillary thyroid carcinoma type nuclear features; FV-PTC, follicular variant PTC; RAS, rat sarcoma virus; BRAF, v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B.


Reference

References

1. Ali SZ, Vanderlaan P. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. 3rd ed. New York: Springer;2023.
2. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press;2022.
3. Jung CK, Bychkov A, Kakudo K. Update from the 2022 World Health Organization classification of thyroid tumors: a standardized diagnostic approach. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022; 37:703–18.
Article
4. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016; 26:1–133.
5. Kakudo K, Katoh R, Sakamoto A, et al. Thyroid gland: international case conference. Endocr Pathol. 2002; 13:131–4.
Article
6. Hirokawa M, Carney JA, Goellner JR, et al. Observer variation of encapsulated follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002; 26:1508–14.
Article
7. Lloyd RV, Erickson LA, Casey MB, et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004; 28:1336–40.
Article
8. Liu Z, Zhou G, Nakamura M, et al. Encapsulated follicular thyroid tumor with equivocal nuclear changes, so-called well-differentiated tumor of uncertain malignant potential: a morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular appraisal. Cancer Sci. 2011; 102:288–94.
Article
9. Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Miyauchi A, Nakamura H. Introducing the reporting system for thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology according to the new guidelines of the Japan Thyroid Association. Endocr J. 2014; 61:539–52.
Article
10. Kakudo K, Kameyama K, Hirokawa M, Katoh R, Nakamura H. Subclassification of follicular neoplasms recommended by the Japan thyroid association reporting system of thyroid cytology. Int J Endocrinol. 2015; 2015:938305.
Article
11. Kakudo K, Higuchi M, Hirokawa M, Satoh S, Jung CK, Bychkov A. Thyroid FNA cytology in Asian practice: active surveillance for indeterminate thyroid nodules reduces overtreatment of thyroid carcinomas. Cytopathology. 2017; 28:455–66.
Article
12. Bychkov A, Hirokawa M, Jung CK, et al. Low rate of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice. Thyroid. 2017; 27:983–4.
Article
13. Vuong HG, Ngo HT, Bychkov A, et al. Differences in surgical resection rate and risk of malignancy in thyroid cytopathology practice between Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020; 128:238–49.
Article
14. Kakudo K. Asian and Western practice in thyroid pathology: similarities and differences. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1614–27.
Article
15. Hirokawa M, Auger M, Jung CK, Callegari FM. Thyroid FNA cytology: the Eastern versus Western perspectives. Cancer Cytopathol. 2023; 131:415–20.
Article
16. Kakudo K, Liu Z, Jung CK, Lai CR. Lessons learned from the diversity of thyroid nodule practice. Cancer Cytopathol. 2023 Jun 6 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22728.
Article
17. Bychkov A, Schubert M. Constant demand, patchy supply. Pathologist. 2023; 88:18–27.
18. Reisch LM, Carney PA, Oster NV, et al. Medical malpractice concerns and defensive medicine: a nationwide survey of breast pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015; 144:916–22.
19. Labarge B, Walter V, Lengerich EJ, et al. Evidence of a positive association between malpractice climate and thyroid cancer incidence in the United States. PLoS One. 2018; 13:e0199862.
Article
20. Kakudo K, Bychkov A, Abelardo A, Keelawat S, Kumarasinghe P. Malpractice climate is a key difference in thyroid pathology practice between North America and the rest of the world. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2019; 143:1171.
Article
21. Renshaw AA, Gould EW. Why there is the tendency to “overdiagnose” the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 117:19–21.
Article
22. Tallini G, Tuttle RM, Ghossein RA. The history of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102:15–22.
Article
23. Nikiforov YE, Seethala RR, Tallini G, et al. Nomenclature revision for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a paradigm shift to reduce overtreatment of indolent tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016; 2:1023–9.
Article
24. Lee YS, Nam KH, Chung WY, et al. Practical management of well differentiated thyroid carcinoma in Korea. Endocr J. 2008; 55:1015–24.
Article
25. Takami H, Ito Y, Okamoto T, Onoda N, Noguchi H, Yoshida A. Revisiting the guidelines issued by the Japanese Society of Thyroid Surgeons and Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons: a gradual move towards consensus between Japanese and western practice in the management of thyroid carcinoma. World J Surg. 2014; 38:2002–10.
Article
26. Ito Y, Onoda N, Okamoto T. The revised clinical practice guidelines on the management of thyroid tumors by the Japan Associations of Endocrine Surgeons: core questions and recommendations for treatments of thyroid cancer. Endocr J. 2020; 67:669–717.
Article
27. Welch HG, Doherty GM. Saving thyroids: overtreatment of small papillary cancers. N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:310–2.
Article
28. Ito Y, Uruno T, Nakano K, et al. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid. 2003; 13:381–7.
Article
29. Castro MR, Morris JC, Ryder M, Brito JP, Hay ID. Most patients with a small papillary thyroid carcinoma enjoy an excellent prognosis and may be managed with minimally invasive therapy or active surveillance. Cancer. 2015; 121:3364–5.
Article
30. Sugitani I, Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Imai T, Suzuki S. Active surveillance versus immediate surgery: questionnaire survey on the current treatment strategy for adult patients with low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Japan. Thyroid. 2019; 29:1563–71.
Article
31. Sugitani I, Ito Y, Takeuchi D, et al. Indications and strategy for active surveillance of adult low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: consensus statements from the Japan Association of Endocrine Surgery Task Force on Management for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Thyroid. 2021; 31:183–92.
Article
32. Ghossein R, Barletta JA, Bullock M, et al. Data set for reporting carcinoma of the thyroid: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. Hum Pathol. 2021; 110:62–72.
Article
33. Shindo H, Kakudo K, Inomata K, et al. Additional tissue sampling trials did not change our thyroid practice. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13:1270.
Article
34. Kakudo K, Li Y, Taniguchi E, Liu Z. Follicular neoplasms in the 4th edition WHO classification of endocrine organs. J Basic Clin Med. 2018; 7:10–9.
35. Jung CK, Bychkov A, Song DE, et al. Molecular correlates and nuclear features of encapsulated follicular-patterned thyroid neoplasms. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021; 36:123–33.
Article
36. Chan J. Strict criteria should be applied in the diagnosis of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 117:16–8.
Article
37. Piana S, Frasoldati A, Di Felice E, Gardini G, Tallini G, Rosai J. Encapsulated well-differentiated follicular-patterned thyroid carcinomas do not play a significant role in the fatality rates from thyroid carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010; 34:868–72.
Article
38. Chetty R. A proposal for the classification of follicular-patterned neoplasms of the thyroid gland. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011; 35:313.
Article
39. Goffredo P, Cheung K, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Can minimally invasive follicular thyroid cancer be approached as a benign lesion?: a population-level analysis of survival among 1,200 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:767–72.
Article
40. Kakudo K. Different threshold of malignancy for RAS-like thyroid tumors causes significant differences in thyroid nodule practice. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14:812.
Article
41. Kakudo K, El-Naggar AK, Hodak SP, et al. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) in thyroid tumor classification. Pathol Int. 2018; 68:327–33.
Article
42. Lloyd RV, Osamura RY, Kloppel G, Rosai J. WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press;2017.
43. Bai Y, Kakudo K, Jung CK. Updates in the pathologic classification of thyroid neoplasms: a review of the World Health Organization classification. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2020; 35:696–715.
Article
44. Bychkov A, Keelawat S, Agarwal S, et al. Impact of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: a multiinstitutional study in five Asian countries. Pathology. 2018; 50:411–7.
Article
45. Bychkov A, Jung CK, Liu Z, Kakudo K. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice: perspectives for surgical pathology and cytopathology. Endocr Pathol. 2018; 29:276–88.
Article
46. Liu Z, Bychkov A, Jung CK, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the morphological evaluation of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features in Asian practice. Pathol Int. 2019; 69:202–10.
Article
47. Vuong HG, Tran TT, Bychkov A, et al. Clinical impact of non-Invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on the risk of malignancy in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis of 14,153 resected thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2019; 25:491–502.
Article
48. Rana C, Vuong HG, Nguyen TQ, et al. The incidence of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a meta-analysis assessing worldwide impact of the reclassification. Thyroid. 2021; 31:1502–13.
Article
49. Bychkov A, Kakudo K, Hong S. Current practices of thyroid fineneedle aspiration in Asia: a missing voice. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:517–20.
Article
50. Jung CK, Hong S, Bychkov A, Kakudo K. The use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in patients with thyroid nodules in Asia: a brief overview of studies from the Working Group of Asian Thyroid FNA Cytology. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:571–8.
Article
51. Thompson LD. Ninety-four cases of encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a name change to Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-like Nuclear Features would help prevent overtreatment. Mod Pathol. 2016; 29:698–707.
Article
52. Kakudo K. Thyroid FNA cytology: differential diagnoses and pitfalls. 3rd ed. Singapore: Springer;2023.
53. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Hashimoto Y, et al. Prevalence and diagnostic challenges of thyroid lymphoma: a multi-institutional study in non-Western countries. Endocr J. 2020; 67:1085–91.
Article
54. Agarwal S, Bychkov A, Jung CK, et al. The prevalence and surgical outcomes of Hurthle cell lesions in FNAs of the thyroid: a multiinstitutional study in 6 Asian countries. Cancer Cytopathol. 2019; 127:181–91.
55. Liu CY, Bychkov A, Agarwal S, et al. Cytologic diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region. Diagn Cytopathol. 2021; 49:60–9.
56. Liu CY, Chen CC, Bychkov A, et al. Constitutive cytomorphologic features of medullary thyroid carcinoma using different staining methods. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11:1396.
Article
57. Jung CK, Agarwal S, Hang JF, Lim DJ, Bychkov A, Mete O. Update on C-cell neuroendocrine neoplasm: prognostic and predictive histopathologic and molecular features of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pathol. 2023; 34:1–22.
Article
58. Zhu Y, Li Y, Jung CK, et al. Histopathologic assessment of capsular invasion in follicular thyroid neoplasms: an observer variation study. Endocr Pathol. 2020; 31:132–40.
Article
59. Lai WA, Hang JF, Liu CY, et al. PAX8 expression in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is less than those reported in early studies: a multiinstitutional study of 182 cases using the monoclonal antibody MRQ-50. Virchows Arch. 2020; 476:431–7.
Article
60. Ngo TN, Le TTB, Le T, et al. Primary versus secondary anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: perspectives from multi-institutional and population-level data. Endocr Pathol. 2021; 32:489–500.
Article
61. Ohba K, Mitsutake N, Matsuse M, et al. Encapsulated papillary thyroid tumor with delicate nuclear changes and a KRAS mutation as a possible novel subtype of borderline tumor. J Pathol Transl Med. 2019; 53:136–41.
Article
62. Jung CK, Park SY, Kim JH, Kakudo K. New insights into classification and risk stratification of encapsulated thyroid tumors with a predominantly papillary architecture. J Pathol Transl Med. 2020; 54:197–203.
Article
63. Giani C, Torregrossa L, Ramone T, et al. Whole tumor capsule is prognostic of very good outcome in the classical variant of papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 106:e4072–83.
Article
64. Nguyen TP, Truong VT, Kakudo K, Vuong HG. The diversities in thyroid cytopathology practices among Asian countries using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1735–46.
Article
65. Vuong HG, Nguyen TP, Hassell LA, Jung CK. Diagnostic performances of the Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier in comparison with the Gene Expression Classifier: a meta-analysis. Cancer Cytopathol. 2021; 129:182–9.
Article
66. Ngo HT, Nguyen TP, Vu TH, et al. Impact of molecular testing on the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules among Western and Asian countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pathol. 2021; 32:269–79.
Article
67. Vuong HG, Suzuki A, Na HY, et al. Application of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in the pediatric population. Am J Clin Pathol. 2021; 155:680–9.
Article
68. Vuong HG, Chung DG, Ngo LM, et al. The use of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in pediatric thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2021; 31:1203–11.
Article
69. Vuong HG, Jung CK, Kakudo K, Bychkov A. Response to Cherella et al. re: “the use of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology in pediatric thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis”. Thyroid. 2021; 31:1442–4.
Article
70. Wang YH, Bychkov A, Chakrabarti I, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cytology practice: an international survey in the Asia-Pacific region. Cancer Cytopathol. 2020; 128:895–904.
Article
71. Vuong HG, Le HT, Le TT, Le T, Hassell L, Kakudo K. Clinicopathological significance of major fusion oncogenes in papillary thyroid carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Pathol Res Pract. 2022; 240:154180.
Article
72. Vuong HG, Le MK, Hassell L, Kondo T, Kakudo K. The differences in distant metastatic patterns and their corresponding survival between thyroid cancer subtypes. Head Neck. 2022; 44:926–32.
Article
73. Vuong HG, Nguyen TP, Ngo HT, Hassell L, Kakudo K. Malignant thyroid teratoma: an integrated analysis of case series/case reports. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2021; 28:495–503.
Article
74. Le HT, Nguyen TP, Hirokawa M, et al. Primary thyroid mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is clinically, prognostically, and molecularly different from sclerosing MEC with eosinophilia: a multicenter and integrated study. Endocr Pathol. 2023; 34:100–11.
Article
75. LiVolsi VA, Asa SL. The demise of follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland. Thyroid. 1994; 4:233–6.
Article
76. Cipriani NA, Nagar S, Kaplan SP, et al. Follicular thyroid carcinoma: how have histologic diagnoses changed in the last half-century and what are the prognostic implications? Thyroid. 2015; 25:1209–16.
Article
77. Kakudo K. Non-invasive encapsulated/well-circumscribed follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) and precursor thyroid tumors. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:1–2.
78. Kakudo K. Unsettled issues in non-invasive encapsulated/wellcircumscribed follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) and precursor thyroid tumors. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:3–7.
79. LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW. Coming to terms with diagnosis “non-invasive follicular neoplasm with papillary like nuclear features (NIFTP)’: practice changer in endocrine pathology. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:8–13.
80. Kakudo K, Liu Z, Satoh S, Higuchi M, Hirokawa M. Non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP): diagnosis and differential diagnoses. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:14–21.
81. Liu Z, Song Y, Han B, Zhang X, Su P, Cui X. Non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features and the practice in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, China. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:22–5.
82. Jung CK, Kim C. Effect of lowering the diagnostic threshold for encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma on the prevalence of non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features: a single-institution experience in Korea. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:26–8.
83. Pusztaszeri MP, Triponez F, Meyer P, Sadowski SM. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP): report of an institutional experience with 86 cases. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:29–35.
84. Rossi ED. NIFTP diagnosis: roses and thorns for cytopathologists and histopathologists. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:36–7.
85. Canberk S, Baloch ZW, Ince U, Schmitt F. Diagnosis of non-invasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP): a practice changer for thyroid fine-needle aspiration interpretation. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:38–43.
86. Maletta F, Volante M, Papotti M. Experience on NIFTP cytology, with a mini meta-analysis of the literature. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:44–50.
87. Ng D, Can NT, Ma ZV, van Zante A, Ljung BM, Khanafshar E. Cytomorphologic features of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP): a comparison with infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 1:51–6.
88. Saglietti C, Bongiovanni M. The value of cytological examination in the diagnosis of noninvasive thyroid neoplasm with papillarylike nuclear features (NIFTP). J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:57–60.
89. Wu HH. The impact of NIFTP on FNA cytology: can we still diagnose papillary thyroid carcinoma? J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:61–2.
90. Yang GC. Ultrasound is cytopathologist’s best friend in the era of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:65–7.
91. Poller DN, Johnson SJ, Stephenson TJ. Diagnosis of NIFTP in the UK. J Basic Clin Med. 2017; 6:63–4.
92. Cha YJ, Pyo JY, Hong S, et al. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology practice in Korea. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:521–7.
Article
93. Liu Z, Liu D, Ma B, et al. History and practice of thyroid fine-needle aspiration in China, based on retrospective study of the practice in Shandong University Qilu Hospital. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:528–32.
Article
94. Agarwal S, Jain D. Thyroid cytology in India: contemporary review and meta-analysis. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:533–47.
Article
95. Satoh S, Yamashita H, Kakudo K. Thyroid cytology: the Japanese system and experience at Yamashita Thyroid Hospital. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:548–54.
Article
96. Abelardo AD. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration practice in the Philippines. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:555–9.
Article
97. Hang JF, Hsu CY, Lai CR. Thyroid fine-needle aspiration in Taiwan: the history and current practice. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:560–4.
Article
98. Keelawat S, Rangdaeng S, Koonmee S, Jitpasutham T, Bychkov A. Current status of thyroid fine-needle aspiration practice in Thailand. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017; 51:565–70.
Article
99. Ohori NP. Molecular testing and thyroid nodule management in North America. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1628–38.
Article
100. Kumarasinghe MP. Standardisation of thyroid cytology terminology and practice: are modifications necessary?: a narrative review. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1639–47.
Article
101. Poller DN. Litigation in thyroid cytology and histopathology in England: a very brief overview. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1648–52.
Article
102. Hirokawa M, Suzuki A, Higuchi M, et al. The Japanese reporting system for thyroid aspiration cytology 2019 (JRSTAC2019). Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1653–62.
Article
103. Ito Y, Miyauchi A. Active surveillance of low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1663–73.
Article
104. Zhu Y, Wu H, Huang B, Shen X, Cai G, Gu X. BRAF(V600E) mutation combined with American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system significantly changes surgical resection rate and risk of malignancy in thyroid cytopathology practice. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1674–84.
Article
105. Pusztaszeri MP, Tamilia M, Payne RJ. Active surveillance for lowrisk small papillary thyroid cancer in North American countries: past, present and future (bridging the gap between North American and Asian practices). Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1685–97.
Article
106. Okamoto T, Omi Y, Yoshida Y, Horiuchi K, Abe K. Radioactive iodine treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma in Japan. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1698–707.
Article
107. Michael CW, Kameyama K, Kitagawa W, Azar N. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) for fine needle aspiration of thyroid: benefits, challenges and innovative solutions. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1708–15.
Article
108. Liu Z, Sui S, Su P, et al. The effect of implementing pre-surgical ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy on thyroid surgery, a 6-year interrupted time series analysis in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1716–23.
Article
109. Canberk S. Precursor and borderline lesions of the thyroid (indolent lesions of epithelial origin): from theory to practice. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1724–34.
Article
110. Oo ZP, Hlaing AM, Kyi KC, Fukuoka J, Bychkov A. An overview of thyroid fine-needle aspiration practice in Myanmar. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1747–53.
Article
111. Tangnuntachai N, Rangdaeng S, Koonmee S, Tangjaturonrasme N, Keelawat S. Pathological practice and management of thyroid nodules: a Thai perspective. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1754–63.
Article
112. Ooi LY, Nga ME. Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance: Asian vs. non-Asian practice, and the Singapore experience. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1764–87.
Article
113. Abelardo AD, Sotalbo KCJ. Clinical management of thyroid aspirates diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance in the Philippines. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1788–96.
Article
114. Guleria P, Mani K, Agarwal S. Indian experience of AUS/FLUS diagnosis: is it different from rest of Asia and the West?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1797–812.
Article
115. Odate T, Oishi N, Vuong HG, Mochizuki K, Kondo T. Genetic differences in follicular thyroid carcinoma between Asian and Western countries: a systematic review. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1813–26.
Article
116. Nakra T, Jain D, Agarwal S. Thyroid lymphoproliferative lesions in Asia. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1827–37.
Article
117. Li Y, Inomata K, Nishihara E, Kakudo K. IgG4 thyroiditis in the Asian population. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1838–46.
Article
118. Bai Y, Niu D, Yao Q, Lin D, Kakudo K. Updates in the advances of sporadic medullary thyroid carcinoma: from the molecules to the clinic. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1847–56.
Article
119. Jung CK, Lee S, Bae JS, Lim DJ. Late-onset distant metastases confer poor prognosis in patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1857–66.
Article
120. Choden S, Keelawat S, Jung CK, Bychkov A. An affordable immunohistochemical approach to estimate the prevalence of BRAF (V600E) in large cohort studies: establishing the baseline rate of BRAF mutation in an institutional series of papillary thyroid carcinoma from Thailand. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1867–77.
Article
121. Rashid FA, Munkhdelger J, Fukuoka J, Bychkov A. Prevalence of BRAF(V600E) mutation in Asian series of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a contemporary systematic review. Gland Surg. 2020; 9:1878–900.
Article
122. Kakudo K, Pusztaszeri M, Bongiovanni M. Factors impacting thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology and algorithm for cytological diagnosis in the Japanese system for reporting FNA cytology. Kakudo K, editor. Thyroid FNA cytology, differential diagnoses and pitfalls. 2nd ed. Singapore: Springer Singapore;2019. p. 19–26.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JPTM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr