Nutr Res Pract.  2023 Oct;17(5):1019-1027. 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.5.1019.

Effects of campus dining sustainable practices on consumers’ perception and behavioral intention in the United States

• Yoon B
• Jun K

• KMID: 2546940
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2023.17.5.1019

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Sustainability has become one of the top priorities in the foodservice industry. With an increase in consumer interest in sustainability and educational opportunities in higher education, it is important to know what sustainable practices are implemented in campus dining and how sustainable practices affect consumers’ responses. This study aims to identify the key sustainable practices in the campus dining context, and investigate the relationship by applying the stimulus-organism-response framework to determine whether the key sustainable practices influence consumers’ perception and behavioral intentions.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
The self-administered online survey was distributed to college students in 8 dining halls at a large southeastern university in the United States from September 20–October 10, 2019. A total of 382 valid questionnaires were collected, and factor analysis and multiple regressions were utilized to test the research model.
RESULTS
This study identified 4 dimensions of campus sustainability with a total of sustainable practices: sustainable food, waste management, energy/water conservation, and recycling/reuse. Three dimensions of sustainable campus practices (i.e., sustainable food, waste management, recycling/reuse) played a significant role in consumers forming a perceived value while energy/water conservation did not significantly influence the consumers’ perceived value toward the campus dining. Waste management was identified as the most important practice to enhance consumers’ perceived value (β = 0.330). Using sustainable food and recycling/reuse were ranked second and third, respectively (β = 0.262, β = 0.154). The findings confirmed the significant positive relationship between perceived value and revisit intentions.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings support the inclusion of dining sustainability as a critical component in explaining college students’ perceived value and revisit intention toward campus dining. Furthermore, this study provides practical implications for university administrators and foodservice operators to consider the key sustainable practices to meet the consumers’ value and revisit intentions.

Keyword

Sustainability; food service; students; perception; consumer behavior

Reference

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (US). Sustainable food systems: concept and framework [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations;2018. cited 2023 January 21. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf .

2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (US). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2022 [Internet]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations;2022. cited 2023 January 21. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/cc0639en/cc0639en.pdf .

3. Tzschentke NA, Kirk D, Lynch PA. Going green: decisional factors in small hospitality operations. Int J Hospit Manag. 2008; 27:126–133.

4. National Restaurant Association (US). Serving up sustainability [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: National Restaurant Association;2022. cited 2022 July 21. Available from: https://conserve.restaurant.org/Best-Practices .

5. Yoon B, Chung Y, Jun K. Restaurant industry practices to promote healthy sustainable eating: a content analysis of restaurant websites using the value chain approach. Sustainability (Basel). 2020; 12:7127.

6. Namkung Y, Jang S. Are consumers willing to pay more for green practices at restaurants? J Hosp Tour Res. 2017; 41:329–356.

7. Turenne J. Sustainability in food service. Baldwin CJ, editor. Sustainability in the Food Industry. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell;2009. p. 225–238.

8. Hu HH, Parsa HG, Self J. The dynamics of green restaurant patronage. Cornell Hosp Q. 2010; 51:344–362.

9. Chen CC, Arendt S, Gregoire MB. What sustainable practices exist in college and university dining service. J Foodservice Manage Educ. 2010; 4:5–10.

10. DiPietro RB, Cao Y, Partlow C. Green practices in upscale foodservice operations: customer perceptions and purchase intentions. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2013; 25:779–796.

11. Yoon B, Lee J, Lim H. Campus dining sustainability: a perspective from college students. Sustainability (Basel). 2023; 15:2134.

12. Harvard University Dining Service (US). Food donation program [Internet]. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University;2022. cited 2022 July 1. Available from: https://dining.harvard.edu/about-huds/sustainability/food-donation-program .

13. Ribeiro JM, Hoeckesfeld L, Magro CB, Favretto J, Barichello R, Lenzi FC, Secchi L, de Lima CR, Guerra JB. Green Campus Initiatives as sustainable development dissemination at higher education institutions: students’ perceptions. J Clean Prod. 2021; 312:127671.

14. Chen CJ, Gregoire MB, Arendt S, Shelley MC. College and university dining services administrators’ intention to adopt sustainable practices: results from US institutions. Int J Sustain High Educ. 2011; 12:145–162.

15. Lee MJ, Kang H, Choi H, Olds D. Managerial attitudes towards green practices in educational restaurant operations: an importance-performance analysis. J Hosp Tour Educ. 2019; 32:142–155.

16. Ju S, Chang H. Consumer perceptions on sustainable practices implemented in foodservice organizations in Korea. Nutr Res Pract. 2016; 10:108–114. PMID: 26865923.

17. Kim JY, Lee YM. Food waste reduction policy in Korea. Waste Manag. 2017; 60:3–11. PMID: 27569731.

18. Kim YK, Jang J. A study on the effect of “zero food waste” policy on restaurant performance. Sustainability. 2020; 12:6917.

19. Kim JY, Kim HK, Kim HJ, Lee KH. The effects of vegetarian and vegan menu options on sales and sustainability in a university dining facility. Sustainability. 2020; 12:1153.

20. Konuk FA. The influence of perceived food quality, price fairness, perceived value and satisfaction on customers’ revisit and word-of mouth intentions towards organic food restaurants. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2019; 50:103–110.

21. Riva F, Magriozos S, Rubel MRB, Rizomyliotis I. Green consumerism, green perceived value, and restaurant revisit intention: millennials’ sustainable consumption with moderating effect of green perceived quality. Bus Strategy Environ. 2022; 31:2807–2819.

22. Jacoby J. Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: an evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. J Consum Psychol. 2002; 12:51–57.

23. Green Restaurant Association (US). Certification standards [Internet]. Boston (MA): Green Restaurant Association;2022. cited 2022 July 1. Available from: https://www.dinegreen.com/certification-standards .

24. Vol Dining Sustainability. What we’re doing on campus [Internet]. Knoxville (TN): University of Tennessee;2018. cited 2023 February 12. Available from: https://ut.campusdish.com/Sustainability/WhatWeAreDoing .

25. Clark LA, Watson DB. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995; 7:309–319.

26. Ryu K, Han H, Kim TH. The relationship among overall quick-casual restaurant image, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. Int J Hospit Manag. 2008; 27:459–469.

27. Ryu K, Lee JS. Examination of restaurant quality, relationship benefits, and customer reciprocity from the perspective of relationship marketing investments. J Hosp Tour Res. 2017; 41:66–92.

28. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon;2007.

29. Kim MJ, Hall CM. Can sustainable restaurant practices enhance customer loyalty? The roles of value theory and environmental concerns. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2020; 43:127–138.

30. Jang YJ. Environmental sustainability management in the foodservice industry: understanding the antecedents and consequences. J Foodserv Bus Res. 2016; 19:441–453.

31. Wang EST. Effect of food service-brand equity on consumer-perceived food value, physical risk, and brand preference. Br Food J. 2015; 117:553–564.

32. Su CH, Tsai CH, Chen MH, Qing Lv W. US sustainable food market generation Z consumer segments. Sustainability (Basel). 2019; 11:3607.